A few facts…

1. The Left heralds abortion as a constitutional right.

2. Facebook allows only people age 13 and over to create personal pages. In other words, every female on Facebook has the legal right to abort.

3. Facebook allows a pro-abortion activist to post instructions on how to commit illegal self-abortions. (Facebook briefly censored the instructions but reposted them and apologized.)

So, logically and objectively speaking, why in the world would Facebook censor information about abortion? Isn’t FB for full disclosure and informed consent?

Would FB actually help promote a surgical procedure but censor what that procedure entails?

Yes, FB does this, and repeatedly, by removing photos showing the reality of abortion.

The latest victim of Facebook’s censorship is Victoria Jackson.

Victoria posted over the weekend:

FB just banned me for 24 hours because of my Pro-Life article. I think it was the photo of an aborted baby. So, they can do it, but they can’t look at it?

Victoria was referring to this Facebook post, and the photo, right (which FB removed):

OBAMA FOUGHT HARD FOR LEGISLATION FOR PARTIAL BIRTH ABORTION. LOOK AT A PHOTO OF WHAT THAT IS.

Victoria also wrote an accompanying FB post and article outing Obama as a fraud regarding concern for the safety of children, which I covered.

In February 2012 Facebook removed a post by pro-life activist Bryan Kemper of Stand True for sharing a “What They Think I Do” poster he and Andy Moore of AbortionWiki.org had created.

Facebook’s hypocritical censorship of truth is one reason World Life Organization created ProLifeBook.com.

Why doesn’t the other side want people to see what abortion does?

Obviously the other side doesn’t want people to know abortion kills babies.

[HT: moderator Carla]

Reprinted with permission from JillStanek.com