Wednesday June 28, 2000
BISHOP EXPLAINS LIMITS OF CCCB ENDORSEMENT OF MARCH OF WOMEN
Ontario CWL spiritual director critical of march and asks that will of grassroots be heeded.
TORONTO, June 28 (LSN.ca) - Bishop Nicola De Angelis, auxiliary bishop of the Archdiocese of Toronto and Spiritual Advisor for the Catholic Women's League (CWL) of Ontario, has issued a letter on the March of Women. It clarifies the endorsement of the March by the executive of the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops (CCCB) pointing out that "the CCCB Executive and the Conferences of Bishops, as stated in Canon Law, are purely administrative bodies. They have no canonical power to issue decrees on any matters related to faith and morals. Indeed theirs was a personal statement which was not meant to, and could not speak on behalf of all the Bishops of Canada."
The bishop's letter comes in response to a CWL package containing the agenda and background information on the upcoming Provincial CWL Convention in Waterloo. The package, sent out by the CWL Ontario executive includes the letters of the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops and individual bishops supporting the March, but excludes those of bishops who oppose it. The Ontario CWL Spiritual Advisor says in his letter to CWL Ontario President Betty Anne Brown, "in all fairness, I would suggest that you circulate as well the official statements of other Bishops" opposed to the March.
In his official capacity as its Spiritual Advisor the bishop "invit(ed) the CWL of Ontario to disassociate itself from the March of Women 2000." Explaining his objection to the March he notes that "it is my firm conviction that we cannot mix good and bad objectives in the hope that good results might be achieved." The Bishop also notes that such is the "firm conviction of the Church as expressed in this classic principle of Catholic moral theology: 'Bonum ex integra causa, malum ex quocumque difectu' (Good comes out of the whole of the cause, evil comes out of any defect within it)."
The bishop's letter notes that a sizeable majority of grassroots CWL members has rejected participation in the March but says that "their ability to express their disagreement with the March has been suppressed and that they are intimidated." He suggests there are other more edifying ways to help women in need.
The letter points out that the March was initiated in 1995 under the name Bread and Roses March by a federally funded lobby group called the National Action Committee for the Status of Women (NAC) - a group which "is officially on record for promoting abortion on demand and homosexual rights" The letter notes that "too often secular organizations such as NAC offer 'bread and roses' to desperate women on condition that they support their agenda i.e. contraception, sterilization, abortion and homosexual rights. This is nothing short of raw
exploitation of the poorest of the poor." Through this, he says, "we promote the harm of women through cooperation with intrinsic evil."
For the entire letter see:
http://lifesite.net/clc/womens_march/deangelisstatement.html
For all the LifeSite coverage on the March see:
http://lifesite.net/clc/womens_march/
Latest Headlines
- BREAKING: US Congress Passes Health Care Reform Bill 220 to 215

- Stupak Amendment to Health Care Bill Passes 240 - 194 Saturday Evening

- Major Health Care Development - Pro-Life Stupak Amendment Vote OK'd for Today

- NY Times: Dems Banking on Later Squeezing Pro-Life Language Out of Bill in Committee

- USCCB Spokesman: "Definitely Not True" that Bishops Support Bill As it Stands

- TIME Got it Wrong - Prof. George Opposed Grandiose Kennedy Funeral

- USCCB Condemnation Tears Facade off "Phony" Abortion Compromise for Health Bill

- Health Care Bill Includes Monthly Abortion Premium: House Minority Leader Boehner

- TIME Article Setting Burke Against O'Malley Called "Tactical strike" on Behalf of Catholic Left

- Dirty Fighting on Abortion Funding: Word-Games and Health-Care Theatrics Boggle the Mind

- Commentary on November 6 News

- Note to LifeSiteNews Subscribers with Rogers email addresses

- New York Gov. Declares Nov. 10 Extraordinary Legislative Session for Same-Sex "Marriage"

- Washington's Pro-Family Amendment Effort Defeated - R-71 Almost Certain to Pass

- Vote Pushed Back on Canadian Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide Bill to Dec. 2

- Elderly U.K. Couple in Good Health Commit Suicide, Complain of Assisted Suicide Law

- Texas Late-Term Abortionist and Baptist Minister Admits: "Am I killing? Yes, I am"

- New Evidence Contradicts CCHD's Findings on Accused Pro-Abortion Partner

- Quebec Priest Denies Possibility of Sexual Reorientation Therapy on TV

- New Hampshire Same-Sex "Marriage" Law in Crosshairs after Maine's Law Crumbles

- Brooklyn Bishop Criticized for Recorded Message Praising Pro-Abortion Politician

- First Group of "Traditionalist" Anglicans in Britain Votes to Enter Catholic Church

Most Read this Week
- Planned Parenthood Director Resigns after Watching Ultrasound of Abortion Procedure
- Nun Defiant Following Rebuke, but Stops Abortion Escorting
- Breaking: Dominican Community Apologizes for Nun Caught Acting as Abortion Escort
- TIME Article Setting Burke Against O'Malley Called "Tactical strike" on Behalf of Catholics Left
- Over 200 Christendom College Students Protest Abortion at Planned Parenthood Clinic
- Scottish Gay Rights Activists Found Guilty of Pedophilia Sentenced to Life Imprisonment
- Newly Identified Corporate Supporters of Planned Parenthood Named
- US Congress Passes Health Care Reform Bill 218 to 215
- Major Health Care Bill Development - Stupak Hyde Amendment Vote OK'd
- Health Care Bill Includes Monthly Abortion Premium: House Minority Leader Boehner
MORE NEWS:
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page
Last 10 Days
Archives
Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.








Back to Top