---

A Voice In the Wilderness

The following open letter on the International March of Women was written by Mrs. Jakki Jeffs, a Life Member of the Catholic Women's League (CWL). A Life Member is given permanent membership on the national council of the CWL.

Mrs. Jeffs is a former president of the CWL of the Hamilton diocese (this diocesan CWL has 12,500 members - about 10% of the CWL national membership). She was also a member of the CWL Ontario provincial board acting as the Educational Convener. Moreover she was recently featured in The Catholic Register as a model CWL leader.

A VOICE IN THE WILDERNESS

What a cruel irony indeed that this Jubilee year, the first of a new millennium, the 80th anniversary of the Catholic Women's League of Canada, should be tainted by such division and disruption.

I am a Life member of the Catholic Women's League as well as an active pro-lifer and during the last two months I have fielded dozens of calls to my office concerning the League's endorsement of the World March of Women 2000. I have read the correspondence distributed by the national executive to defend their commitment of our involvement with this March.

More recently and most sadly, I have read the May 16th joint statement of renewed support for the March - released by the Canadian Conference of Bishops, the Catholic Women's League of Canada, the Canadian Religious Conference and the Catholic Organization for Development and Peace. I am placed in the position of feeling like David must have done as he walked out to face Goliath - unsure whether or not my story will end up the same way.

Is it really possible to ignore the Demands of the March for Women 2000 which call for the promotion of abortion as a human right for women as well as support for lesbian marriage? They also downplay the traditional family - not only in the listed demands, but also in international documents and institutions which they also demand that we support. These include the Convention to Eliminate all Forms of Discrimination Against Women, (whose committee has challenged a country for introducing Mother's Day since it promotes a negative stereotype) - The Convention on the Rights of the Child, (while intending to set a world standard to protect children in short, by this convention, parents' rights and responsibilities in relation to their children are to be determined by the state which will decide the "required conditions for, a child's physical, mental, spiritual, moral and social development." raising alarming totalitarian possibilities.")

The Platform of Action from the Beijing Conference on Women, (which bracketed the term "mother" throughout the entire document so that it might be changed to "caretaker." Inferring that parents are irrelevant in adolescent health decisions it states that governments should, "emphasize the role and responsibility of adolescents in sexual and reproductive behaviour through the provision of appropriate services and counseling recognizing their rights to privacy, confidentiality and informed consent." The platform urges governments to "take action to ensure that women's sexual and reproductive rights are fully recognized and respected.")

The International Criminal Court. (In effect, the ICC would be a Nuremberg court in perpetuity, but significantly, it would be a court with much wider powers. At the Preparatory Committee hearings on the ICC held in New York in December 1997, the definition of war crimes was amended to include gender or sexual offences, included in the definition was "enforced pregnancy" which is the word chosen to replace abortion in U.N. negotiations. The CCCB itself asked the Hon. Lloyd Axworthy, "We urge you to instruct the Canadian delegation to support the removal of enforced pregnancy as a proposed crime, or its substitution by another more appropriate and precise term such as forcible impregnation..." The fear is that countries who prohibit abortion or individuals who oppose the provision of abortion might be brought before this court accused of a "gender crime" - enforced pregnancy.)

These documents include further attacks on our traditionally held beliefs on human sexuality, human life, marriage, family, parental rights and our Faith. Those which the Vatican has ratified, it has done so with grave reservations; these have been formally documented. Yet, we have been reassured that it is possible to ignore all this, because the organizers supposedly have as their main objective the elimination of poverty and violence for women! I don't believe this for one minute. I believe we need to continue to find ways of helping women by walking with those who respect our values.

I can only imagine the sniggering of those who have managed to draw the leadership of our Canadian Roman Catholic Community into this horrendous situation. Grass roots Roman Catholics like me feel betrayed and this is a bitter pill to swallow from those whom we expect to uphold and defend our Faith.

God Bless us all!

Mrs Jakki Jeffs

 Back to Top

---

MORE NEWS: LifeSiteNews.com Home Page  Last 10 Days   Archives   Special Reports

Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.