Friday April 16, 2004
Medical Experts Testify Partial-Birth Abortion Never Medically Necessary
NEW YORK, April 16, 2004 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The American Center for Law and Justice, which specializes in constitutional law and pro-life litigation, said today the Department of Justice, which is defending the national ban on partial-birth abortion in three trials nationwide, presented sound and convincing testimony this week in New York concluding that partial-birth abortion is never medically necessary, the procedure itself is unsafe, and that the partially-born child experiences pain during the life-ending procedure.
"The evidence presented by the Department of Justice produces a clear picture of a procedure that takes the life of a partially-born child in a manner that is brutal, painful, and barbaric - a procedure that is unsafe and never medically necessary," said Jay Sekulow, Chief Counsel of the ACLJ, who is supporting the Department of Justice in its defense of the ban and attending the trial in New York City. "The medical experts provided sound and convincing testimony that underscore the fact that this procedure has no place in our culture or in the medical community. With the strong case presented by the government, we are hopeful the court ultimately will conclude that the ban on partial-birth abortion is constitutional."
During testimony in New York this week, medical experts told the court that the partial-birth abortion procedure, which often includes the dismemberment and decapitation of the partially-born child, results in "prolonged and intense pain" to the fetus.
Another physician testified that the procedure is "certainly excruciatingly painful." He also told the court that a fetus exhibits acute stress to outside stimulus at the age of 18 weeks.
The government produced numerous medical experts who testified that the procedure is never medically necessary to preserve the life or the health of the mother. One physician said the procedure is not safer than other abortion methods and testified that he had "grave concerns" about the long-term health consequences of women who receive partial-birth abortions.
On Tuesday, a federal appeals court is expected to consider an appeal of a federal court order compelling the release of medical records involving partial-birth abortions. U.S. District Court Judge Richard Casey, who is hearing the New York case, ordered two New York hospitals to produce medical records to the Justice Department. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit delayed the order pending a hearing on the issue scheduled for April 20.
The New York trial is one of three across the nation where the ban on partial-birth abortion, passed by Congress and signed into law by President Bush, is being challenged. In the New York case, the ACLU and the National Abortion Federation are challenging the ban.
The ACLJ, which is posting details of the testimony online at http://www.aclj.org, will be filing amicus briefs representing members of Congress who sponsored the legislation banning partial-birth abortion.
Latest Headlines
- BREAKING: US Congress Passes Health Care Reform Bill 220 to 215

- Stupak Amendment to Health Care Bill Passes 240 - 194 Saturday Evening

- Major Health Care Development - Pro-Life Stupak Amendment Vote OK'd for Today

- NY Times: Dems Banking on Later Squeezing Pro-Life Language Out of Bill in Committee

- USCCB Spokesman: "Definitely Not True" that Bishops Support Bill As it Stands

- TIME Got it Wrong - Prof. George Opposed Grandiose Kennedy Funeral

- USCCB Condemnation Tears Facade off "Phony" Abortion Compromise for Health Bill

- Health Care Bill Includes Monthly Abortion Premium: House Minority Leader Boehner

- TIME Article Setting Burke Against O'Malley Called "Tactical strike" on Behalf of Catholic Left

- Dirty Fighting on Abortion Funding: Word-Games and Health-Care Theatrics Boggle the Mind

- Commentary on November 6 News

- Note to LifeSiteNews Subscribers with Rogers email addresses

- New York Gov. Declares Nov. 10 Extraordinary Legislative Session for Same-Sex "Marriage"

- Washington's Pro-Family Amendment Effort Defeated - R-71 Almost Certain to Pass

- Vote Pushed Back on Canadian Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide Bill to Dec. 2

- Elderly U.K. Couple in Good Health Commit Suicide, Complain of Assisted Suicide Law

- Texas Late-Term Abortionist and Baptist Minister Admits: "Am I killing? Yes, I am"

- New Evidence Contradicts CCHD's Findings on Accused Pro-Abortion Partner

- Quebec Priest Denies Possibility of Sexual Reorientation Therapy on TV

- New Hampshire Same-Sex "Marriage" Law in Crosshairs after Maine's Law Crumbles

- Brooklyn Bishop Criticized for Recorded Message Praising Pro-Abortion Politician

- First Group of "Traditionalist" Anglicans in Britain Votes to Enter Catholic Church

Most Read this Week
- Planned Parenthood Director Resigns after Watching Ultrasound of Abortion Procedure
- Nun Defiant Following Rebuke, but Stops Abortion Escorting
- Breaking: Dominican Community Apologizes for Nun Caught Acting as Abortion Escort
- Over 200 Christendom College Students Protest Abortion at Planned Parenthood Clinic
- TIME Article Setting Burke Against O'Malley Called "Tactical strike" on Behalf of Catholics Left
- Scottish Gay Rights Activists Found Guilty of Pedophilia Sentenced to Life Imprisonment
- Newly Identified Corporate Supporters of Planned Parenthood Named
- Major Health Care Bill Development - Stupak Hyde Amendment Vote OK'd
- Health Care Bill Includes Monthly Abortion Premium: House Minority Leader Boehner
- Canadian MP Launches Petition to Stop Federal Funding of Planned Parenthood
MORE NEWS:
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page
Last 10 Days
Archives
Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.








Back to Top