Politics
Wednesday December 8, 2004
Crafters of Canada's Clone-and-Kill Legislation Promote their Deceptive Bill to US Bioethics Council
"Better than nothing" rhetoric continues to echo
TODAY'S HEADLINES
E-MAIL
PRINT
WASHINGTON, December 8, 2004 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A delegation of representatives from Canada's Ministry of Health met in Washington with the US President's Council on Bioethics Friday to give a presentation on Canada's Assisted Human Reproductive Technologies Act.
Ian Shugart, the Assistant Deputy Minister of Health and Glen Rivard, the general counsel of Health Canada, spoke extensively on the circumstances surrounding the bill's passage last March, on the bill's contents and the government rationale behind it.
The bill was extensively analyzed by pro-life groups, most prominently by Campaign Life Coalition (CLC), who found it to be among the most deadly threats to human life passed in Canada since the 1969 Omnibus Bill allowed abortion. CLC, along with a consortium of pro-life groups from around the country, fought a close, but ultimately losing battle against the bill for two years.
Shugart and Rivard were quick to perpetuate the myth that Canadian law now prohibits cloning for reproductive or therapeutic purposes. "I won't go into great detail on all of (the prohibitions), but clearly human cloning is prohibited. All forms of human cloning and for any purpose is prohibited under this legislation," Rivard told the Council.
However, the devil is in the details and a close examination of the Canadian legislation finds at least one place where cloning - although not called such under the bill's faulty definitions - is permitted as long as the resulting embryo is killed instead of being brought to term.
Various groups and experts warned the Campaign Life Coalition leadership early on that the progress of the Canadian legislation was being observed carefully by the international community. With carefully worded loopholes and manipulation of inaccurate definitions, the Canadian government was able to pass a bill that convinced Canadians that their darkest, science fiction fears were averted, while passing a law that allows researchers one of the most permissive legal environments in the world. Now the deceptions are being carried into other countries.
Ian Shugart, told the Council one thing with which no pro-life Canadian could disagree. He said, "Some provisions of this bill were enormously important for the nature of human life and of reproduction and of society." But the government's conclusion and the conclusion that pro-life Canadians came to about the outcome of the legislation are in sharp contrast.
Rivard echoed the suggestion made by many - including the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops in its presentation to the Senate - when it's spokesman said, "there's sufficient consensus developed that, although not perfect in anyone's eyes, this was a much better state of affairs than what existed."
Canadian pro-life leaders beg to differ.
To read the presentation:
http://www.bioethics.gov/transcripts/dec04/dec03.doc
To read the complete analysis of the legislation's deceptive language and flaws:
http://www.lifesite.net/features/stemcellembryo/c13finalcritique.pdf
hw
Back to TopLatest Headlines
- Cardinal Rigali: You Can't Claim to be "Reducing Abortions" but Publicly Funding them in D.C.
- General Electric to Use Embryonic Stem Cells for Testing, Phase out Lab Rats
- Ohio Supreme Court Allows Planned Parenthood to Conceal Abortion Records in Sexual Abuse Case
- LifeSiteNews Canada Day and Independence Day Message. Taking a few days off. LSN returns Monday July 6
- Heroically Pro-Life Brazilian Archbishop's Resignation Accepted Under Cloud of Vatican Newspaper Misrepresentation
- Pro-Life Groups Announce New Colorado Personhood Initiative
- Judge Puts Kibosh on DC Gay "Marriage" Referendum
- Al Franken Win Hands Supermajority to Senate Democrats
- Group Funded by Canadian Bishops' D&P Joins with Others to Denounce the "Natural Family" and "Family Rights"
- Financially Troubled Planned Parenthood of El Paso Closes Doors
- Abortion Linked to Subsequent Pre-Term Births, New Research Again Confirms
- New Orleans Homosexual Couple Ask Fed. Court to Overturn Marriage Amendment
- Slim Hope Of New Ontario Progressive Conservative Party Leader Promoting Pro-Life, Pro-Family Issues
- Pope Accepts Resignation of Bishop Caught Involved in Homosexual Encounters
- Young Children Removed from UK Schools for "Inappropriate Sexual Behaviour"
- Northern Ireland Politician Cleared of Wrongdoing after Reiterating Christian Teaching on Homosexual Acts
- UK Conservative Leader Speaks at Gay Pride Fundraiser
- More Letters to the Editor on Canadian Catholic Development and Peace Scandal (July 1)
- Letters to the Editor - Readers Respond to Development and Peace Scandal
- Watch This Dramatic New Video on Catholic Bishops Conference Funding of Pro-Abortion Groups
Most Read this Week
- Homosexual Duke U. Director Charged with Offering Adopted 5-Year-Old for Sex
- Famed Fr. Corapi Calls Canadian Bishops' Dissent from Humanae Vitae "Catastrophic"
- Pope: It is a Childish Faith to Oppose the Church Teaching on Life and Family
- LifeSiteNews Detailed Response to Canadian Bishops' Whitewash Report on Development and Peace
- Heroically Pro-Life Brazilian Archbishop's Resignation Accepted Under Cloud of Vatican Newspaper Misrepresentation
- Young Children Removed from UK Schools for "Inappropriate Sexual Behaviour"
- Is Pro-Choice the New Pro-Life?
- General Electric to Use Embryonic Stem Cells for Testing, Phase Out Lab Rats
- Swedish Parents Won't Tell if Child is Boy or Girl as Gender Experiment
- Cardinal Rigali: You Can't Claim to be "Reducing Abortions" but Publicly Funding them in D.C.
MORE NEWS: 
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page Last 10 Days Archives Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.