---

Massachusetts Court Rules Homosexual 'Marriage' a Must - 'Civil Union' Not Enough

Confirms warnings that so-called civil unions 'compromises' will never satisfy activist courts or gays

BOSTON, February 4, 2004 (LifeSiteNews.com) - In a 4-3 split decision, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled that denying same-sex couples the official status of 'marriage' versus a 'civil union' is 'unconstitutional.' The ruling came after an earlier court decision which mandated that the legislature rewrite the marriage law to include homosexual couples. The wording of the original ruling was vague and left lawmakers wondering if a 'civil union' law, similar to Vermont's, would suffice.

The Massachusetts court said that any bill that fails to call homosexual union a 'marriage' would create an "unconstitutional, inferior, and discriminatory status for same-sex couples."

Wednesday the legislature will hold a constitutional convention, which will consider an amendment to the constitution that would render the definition of marriage as "between one man and one woman". A vote on the amendment would not be possible, however, until 2006; the high court ruling will thus be law until then.

Read the Focus on the Family reaction to the ruling:
http://family.org

Also read the Family Research Council press release at:
http://www.frc.org?i=PR04B03

 Back to Top

---

MORE NEWS: LifeSiteNews.com Home Page  Last 10 Days   Archives   Special Reports

Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.