Tuesday March 9, 2004
Developments in the U.S. Battle to Save Traditional Marriage
March 9, 2004 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Even though no US state explicitly allows homosexuals to register their unions as marriage, individual civil servants, judges and officials are continuing to push the legal envelope.
Homosexual activists have argued that the way to win their fight for legal recognition of their liaisons as marriage is not through the legislatures, where public opinion still holds sway with elected representatives, but through manipulation of the local bureaucracy and judicial overrides of laws. The tactic worked smoothly in Ontario and is soon to be imposed by a sympathetic Canadian government on the rest of the country by judicial order. In the US, because of the existence of the legal concept of "checks and balances" intended to protect democratic freedoms, the process is more complicated.
In Multnomah County, Oregon, a judge has refused to block county officials from issuing marriage licenses to homosexual partners. Judge Dale Koch said the pro-family group, Defense of Marriage Coalition, failed to convince him to issue a temporary restraining order. Oregon Attorney General Hardy Myers is reviewing state law and the Oregon regarding marriage.
In Massachusetts, a 1913 law forbids town clerks from issuing marriage licenses ''if such marriage would be void if contracted'' in the couple's home state. Town clerks are awaiting instructions from either the attorney general or the governor on how to handle homosexual couples coming to get "married" from out of state. ''As the law is written now, anyone outside the jurisdiction who cannot be married legally there can't be married here. That might be all 50 states,'' said Linda Hutchenrider, president of the Massachusetts Town Clerks' Association.
Maine's House and Senate have each rejected proposals that sought to draft a state constitutional amendment defining marriage as being between a man and a woman. The sponsor of the measure, Rep. Brian Duprey, has since written a letter to Attorney General G. Steven Rowe asking if he would enforce Maine's statute barring same-sex marriages if a municipality in the state issued marriage licenses to gay couples.
In New Jersey, a homosexual couple has been "married" with a license issued by the Asbury Park city officials. "As a show of support to the city's gay community…the City of Asbury Park… will commence the issuance of licenses to same-sex couples and the solemnization of marriage between same-sex couples, immediately, as a matter of fundamental civil and constitutional rights," said a spokeswoman for City Clerk, Dawn Tomek. New Jersey is one of 12 states that have no statute expressly banning same-sex marriages and nothing in its state law defines marriage as the exclusive province of opposite-sex couples.
In New York, the Ulster County District Attorney is considering charges against two ministers who "married" homosexual partners without a license.
Latest Headlines
- US Congress Passes Health Care Reform Bill 220 - 215

- Stupak Amendment to Health Care Bill Passes 240 - 194 Saturday Evening

- NY Times: Dems Banking on Later Squeezing Pro-Life Language Out of Bill in Committee

- USCCB Spokesman: "Definitely Not True" that Bishops Support Bill As it Stands

- TIME Got it Wrong - Prof. George Opposed Grandiose Kennedy Funeral

- Major Health Care Development - Pro-Life Stupak Amendment Vote OK'd for Saturday

- USCCB Condemnation Tears Facade off "Phony" Abortion Compromise for Health Bill

- Health Care Bill Includes Monthly Abortion Premium: House Minority Leader Boehner

- TIME Article Setting Burke Against O'Malley Called "Tactical strike" on Behalf of Catholic Left

- Dirty Fighting on Abortion Funding: Word-Games and Health-Care Theatrics Boggle the Mind

- Commentary on November 6 News

- Note to LifeSiteNews Subscribers with Rogers email addresses

- New York Gov. Declares Nov. 10 Extraordinary Legislative Session for Same-Sex "Marriage"

- Washington's Pro-Family Amendment Effort Defeated - R-71 Almost Certain to Pass

- Vote Pushed Back on Canadian Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide Bill to Dec. 2

- Elderly U.K. Couple in Good Health Commit Suicide, Complain of Assisted Suicide Law

- Texas Late-Term Abortionist and Baptist Minister Admits: "Am I killing? Yes, I am"

- New Evidence Contradicts CCHD's Findings on Accused Pro-Abortion Partner

- Quebec Priest Denies Possibility of Sexual Reorientation Therapy on TV

- New Hampshire Same-Sex "Marriage" Law in Crosshairs after Maine's Law Crumbles

- Brooklyn Bishop Criticized for Recorded Message Praising Pro-Abortion Politician

- First Group of "Traditionalist" Anglicans in Britain Votes to Enter Catholic Church

Most Read this Week
- Planned Parenthood Director Resigns after Watching Ultrasound of Abortion Procedure
- Nun Defiant Following Rebuke, but Stops Abortion Escorting
- Breaking: Dominican Community Apologizes for Nun Caught Acting as Abortion Escort
- TIME Article Setting Burke Against O'Malley Called "Tactical strike" on Behalf of Catholics Left
- Over 200 Christendom College Students Protest Abortion at Planned Parenthood Clinic
- US Congress Passes Health Care Reform Bill 218 to 215
- Newly Identified Corporate Supporters of Planned Parenthood Named
- Scottish Gay Rights Activists Found Guilty of Pedophilia Sentenced to Life Imprisonment
- Major Health Care Bill Development - Stupak Hyde Amendment Vote OK'd
- Health Care Bill Includes Monthly Abortion Premium: House Minority Leader Boehner
MORE NEWS:
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page
Last 10 Days
Archives
Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.








Back to Top