Monday August 29, 2005
Judge Rules Phoenix Sherrif Cannot Refuse to Transport Inmates for Elective Abortion
PHOENIX, Arizona, August 29, 2005, (LifeSiteNews.com) - Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Barry Schneider rejected arguments by County Sheriff Joe Arpaio defending his office’s refusal to transport women inmates to a medical facility for an elective abortion unless they first get a court order.
Court documents indicate that the Sheriff’s arguments were based on: “(1) security of the inmates and others; (2) limiting liability exposure, i.e., liability to third persons who may have an interest in the unborn fetus or for complications related to the abortion; and (3) ensuring that Defendants do not violate the law prohibiting the use of public funds for an abortion.”
The ruling also states that the plaintiffs, namely the Reproductive Freedom Project of the American Civil Liberties Union, argued that “There is the undue burden test articulated in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992). Applying this test, the State may not adopt a regulation that places a substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking an abortion.”
Regarding the third defense the ruling indicated that “As to the third purpose, the avoidance of Defendants violating the law prohibiting expenditure of funds for an abortion, this concern loses its validity as long as the inmate arranges to pay for the procedures, as occurred in this case. Also, the law prohibits public funds being “expended for payment to any person or entity for the performance of an abortion.” A.R.S. §35-196.02. Providing transportation is not paying for the performance of an abortion.”
In comments to Howard Fischer of Capital Media Services, Sheriff Arpaio disagreed with the Judges comments saying "You lose a lot of rights when you're in jail, whether it's trying to get an abortion or watching R-rated movies or sex movies or smoking or coffee," all of which are denied inmates in his jails.
Arizona Daily Star
http://www.dailystar.com/dailystar/news/90209.php
Superior Court of Maricopa County, Public Information
http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/publicInfo/rulings/rulingsReaditem.asp?aut...
db
Latest Headlines
- Irony: 19-Child Duggar Family Renting Former Home of Local Planned Parenthood Leader

- Document Reveals Inconsistencies in ND's Jenkins Claims on ND88

- New Country Music Star Born as Pro-Life Ballad Climbs the Charts

- Future of Pontifical Academy for Life at Stake as Members Meet in Closed Door Session

- Rally Planned in Defence of Canadian Pro-Life Ad

- Commentary on February 8 News

- Chinese Human-Rights Crusaders Nominated for Nobel Peace Prize

- U.K.’s Conservative Leader Pledges Full Support to Gay Agenda

- B.C. Civil Liberties Association Goes to Bat for Pro-Life Student Club

- Police Refuse to Release Federal "Threat Assessment" on Wis. Pro-Lifers

- Canadian Human Rights Commission Appeals Ruling against Hate Messages Statute

- Homosexual Activist Keith Norton Dies at 69

- Malta Celebrates 32nd Pro-Life Day

- My Vote for Best Pro-life Super Bowl Ad: Google’s Parisian Love Story

- Pope: Family Necessary for Child Development

- Letters to the Editor

Most Read this Week
- Veterans, Former Army Legal Chief Defend “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”
- Planned Parenthood President Lands Spot on Ford Foundation Board
- Rabbis Warn against 'Disaster' of Open Homosexuality in the Military
- Football Pros Give Support to Tim Tebow Super Bowl Ad
- Clash of the Abortion Titans: Planned Parenthood Launches 'Pro-Choice' Football Ad
- Canadian Station Pulls Pro-Life Ad – Too “Graphic”
- Hijacking the Brain — How Pornography Works
- Group Exposes Media "Fraud" at March for Life
- U.S. Sisters in Crisis after Embracing “Secular Culture”: Vatican Cardinal
- NYT: Rampant Polygamy in Gay 'Marriage' May Benefit Institution
MORE NEWS:
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page
Last 10 Days
Archives
Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.








Back to Top