Friday July 15, 2005
Church Cannot Baptize Babies of Same-Sex Couples Says Quebec Cardinal
By John Jalsevac
OTTAWA, ON, July 15, 2005 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Just how confusing and damaging the official legal recognition of same-sex 'marriage' will be has been made apparent by Cardinal Ouellet's recent remarks to the Senate's Bill C-38 committee.
"If I take the example of the ceremony of baptism, according to our Canon law," said the Cardinal during his testimony at the Committee on Wednesday, "we cannot accept the signatures of two fathers or two mothers as parents of an infant. With a law that makes these unions official, situations of this will multiply and this threatens to disturb not just the use of our territory, but also our archives and other aspects of the life of our communities."
Several mainstream newspapers, however, have confused the issue by quoting an associate general secretary of the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops, Benoit Bariteau, who appeared at first to be in disagreement with Cardinal Ouelett. Bariteau was quoted as saying that "If the parents insist that the two signatures be on the act of baptism, if we say no, it will be their choice of seeking baptism or not." Certain newspapers took this statement and others to mean that Bariteau believed that if only one of the parents signed the baptismal act then the Church would perform the baptism.
LifeSiteNews.com spoke with Mr. Bariteau, who clarified that he was in perfect agreement with Cardinal Ouellet's statements and the Church's Canon law. Bariteau complained that the certain news sources had taken both his and Cardinal Ouelett's statements out of context and distorted the conclusions and created the confusion.
Paragraph 868 of the Canon law states that: "For an infant to be baptized lawfully it is required…that there be a well-founded hope that the child will be brought up in the catholic religion. If such hope is truly lacking, the baptism is, in accordance with the provisions of particular law, to be deferred and the parents advised of the reason for this."
Ouelett's statement to the committee partially reflect the fact that there is little well-founded hope that a baby brought into a homosexual home, which homosexual 'parents' have no intention of altering their lifestyle, will be brought up in the Catholic religion, since homosexuality is so fundamentally contrary to Catholic teaching. The couple is demonstrating a public, persistent contempt for fundamental Catholic teaching by their relationship.
Bariteau explained that both members of a gay couple obviously cannot sign the baptism act because that automatically and tangibly violates the very specific nature of Catholic teaching on the nature of marriage and parenthood, included in Canon Law. However, he also agreed that even if only one of the homosexual 'parents' signs the baptism act it "doesn't change the reality" that the parents are living in a manner that is directly contrary to the teachings of the Catholic faith. "
According to the Canon law the Catholic Church cannot accept two fathers or two mothers as parents of a child," affirmed Bariteau. "When a child's parents ask for baptism for a child, the priest has to apply the rules of canon law." However, although the Church obviously cannot baptize a child when Canon law is directly violated, there are exceptions, such as if the baby is in danger of death, when the Church is required to baptize as soon as possible. As well, a child brought up by a homosexual couple and who achieves the age of reason may express his own desire to enter the Church, and then be baptized.
Latest Headlines
- Cardinal Rigali: You Can't Claim to be "Reducing Abortions" but Publicly Funding them in D.C.

- General Electric to Use Embryonic Stem Cells for Testing, Phase out Lab Rats

- Ohio Supreme Court Allows Planned Parenthood to Conceal Abortion Records in Sexual Abuse Case

- LifeSiteNews Canada Day and Independence Day Message. Taking a few days off. LSN returns Monday July 6

- Heroically Pro-Life Brazilian Archbishop's Resignation Accepted Under Cloud of Vatican Newspaper Misrepresentation

- Pro-Life Groups Announce New Colorado Personhood Initiative

- Judge Puts Kibosh on DC Gay "Marriage" Referendum

- Al Franken Win Hands Supermajority to Senate Democrats

- Group Funded by Canadian Bishops' D&P Joins with Others to Denounce the "Natural Family" and "Family Rights"

- Financially Troubled Planned Parenthood of El Paso Closes Doors

- Abortion Linked to Subsequent Pre-Term Births, New Research Again Confirms

- New Orleans Homosexual Couple Ask Fed. Court to Overturn Marriage Amendment

- Slim Hope Of New Ontario Progressive Conservative Party Leader Promoting Pro-Life, Pro-Family Issues

- Pope Accepts Resignation of Bishop Caught Involved in Homosexual Encounters

- Young Children Removed from UK Schools for "Inappropriate Sexual Behaviour"

- Northern Ireland Politician Cleared of Wrongdoing after Reiterating Christian Teaching on Homosexual Acts

- UK Conservative Leader Speaks at Gay Pride Fundraiser

- More Letters to the Editor on Canadian Catholic Development and Peace Scandal (July 1)

- Letters to the Editor - Readers Respond to Development and Peace Scandal

- Watch This Dramatic New Video on Catholic Bishops Conference Funding of Pro-Abortion Groups

Most Read this Week
- Homosexual Duke U. Director Charged with Offering Adopted 5-Year-Old for Sex
- Famed Fr. Corapi Calls Canadian Bishops' Dissent from Humanae Vitae "Catastrophic"
- Pope: It is a Childish Faith to Oppose the Church Teaching on Life and Family
- Heroically Pro-Life Brazilian Archbishop's Resignation Accepted Under Cloud of Vatican Newspaper Misrepresentation
- General Electric to Use Embryonic Stem Cells for Testing, Phase Out Lab Rats
- LifeSiteNews Detailed Response to Canadian Bishops' Whitewash Report on Development and Peace
- Young Children Removed from UK Schools for "Inappropriate Sexual Behaviour"
- Is Pro-Choice the New Pro-Life?
- Swedish Parents Won't Tell if Child is Boy or Girl as Gender Experiment
- Cardinal Rigali: You Can't Claim to be "Reducing Abortions" but Publicly Funding them in D.C.
MORE NEWS:
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page
Last 10 Days
Archives
Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.







Back to Top