Monday June 13, 2005
Abortion Breast Cancer Facts not Welcome at Halifax Conference
HALIFAX, June 13, 2005 (LifeSiteNews.com) – A group providing information about the link between abortion and breast cancer were asked to leave an international conference on Breast Cancer in Halifax last week. Ellen Chesal of the group, Positive Options for Women, told LifeSite News.com that their table at the conference was very well received by most of the conference attendees. “We ran out of material and had to go out to run off more,” she said.
On the second day of the conference, however, the group was approached by one conference organizer and accused of misleading women. Chesal said, “A board member from the Breast Cancer Foundation approached us, enraged, and spitting out accusations about us having a hidden agenda and that we were presenting a lie to frighten
women from having abortions.”
The group was called to a meeting with conference organizers that afternoon and asked to leave. “They were very polite at the time,” said Chesal. Chesal presented the letter that had been sent months before clearly outlining their intention and the kind of material they would be presenting. At that point, the organizers changed tactics and said that the Muslim women in attendance were “completely appalled” by their mention of abortion. “We were accused of being ‘insensitive’ since in Muslim countries, one simply never mentions the word ‘abortion,’” said Chesal.
The group’s aim was to inform women of the well-documented connection between abortion and breast cancer, called the ABC Link. Most western cancer organizations, including the Canadian Cancer Society have vigorously denied the link and ignored the mounting medical and statistical evidence that a history of abortion increases a woman’s risk of breast cancer by as much as 160%. 28 out of 37 worldwide studies have independently linked induced abortion with breast cancer since the question was first analysed in 1957. Since the advent of legalized abortion however, most groups and medical organizations have attempted to deny or cover up the link.
With the equating of women’s rights with abortion on demand, the suggestion that abortion could in any way be detrimental to women’s health has come to be seen as an attack on women’s freedom. Chesal found out to her surprise that the organizers were opposed to women even receiving information.
Chesal said that she felt their efforts were not wasted however, “Lots of information went out and many women from many countries,” she said. “A Nigerian woman was surprised we were leaving and took a lot of our stuff as we were packing up.”
“One woman from Mississippi said she had just finished counselling a sixteen year old with breast cancer. It was the youngest she had ever seen. She didn’t know at the time to ask if she had had an abortion. Now she knows about the link.”
For more information on the abortion breast cancer link:
http://www.abortionbreastcancer.com/The_Link.htm
HW
Latest Headlines
- US Congress Passes Health Care Reform Bill 220 - 215

- Stupak Amendment to Health Care Bill Passes 240 - 194 Saturday Evening

- NY Times: Dems Banking on Later Squeezing Pro-Life Language Out of Bill in Committee

- USCCB Spokesman: "Definitely Not True" that Bishops Support Bill As it Stands

- TIME Got it Wrong - Prof. George Opposed Grandiose Kennedy Funeral

- Major Health Care Development - Pro-Life Stupak Amendment Vote OK'd for Saturday

- USCCB Condemnation Tears Facade off "Phony" Abortion Compromise for Health Bill

- Health Care Bill Includes Monthly Abortion Premium: House Minority Leader Boehner

- TIME Article Setting Burke Against O'Malley Called "Tactical strike" on Behalf of Catholic Left

- Dirty Fighting on Abortion Funding: Word-Games and Health-Care Theatrics Boggle the Mind

- Commentary on November 6 News

- Note to LifeSiteNews Subscribers with Rogers email addresses

- New York Gov. Declares Nov. 10 Extraordinary Legislative Session for Same-Sex "Marriage"

- Washington's Pro-Family Amendment Effort Defeated - R-71 Almost Certain to Pass

- Vote Pushed Back on Canadian Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide Bill to Dec. 2

- Elderly U.K. Couple in Good Health Commit Suicide, Complain of Assisted Suicide Law

- Texas Late-Term Abortionist and Baptist Minister Admits: "Am I killing? Yes, I am"

- New Evidence Contradicts CCHD's Findings on Accused Pro-Abortion Partner

- Quebec Priest Denies Possibility of Sexual Reorientation Therapy on TV

- New Hampshire Same-Sex "Marriage" Law in Crosshairs after Maine's Law Crumbles

- Brooklyn Bishop Criticized for Recorded Message Praising Pro-Abortion Politician

- First Group of "Traditionalist" Anglicans in Britain Votes to Enter Catholic Church

Most Read this Week
- Planned Parenthood Director Resigns after Watching Ultrasound of Abortion Procedure
- Nun Defiant Following Rebuke, but Stops Abortion Escorting
- Breaking: Dominican Community Apologizes for Nun Caught Acting as Abortion Escort
- TIME Article Setting Burke Against O'Malley Called "Tactical strike" on Behalf of Catholics Left
- Over 200 Christendom College Students Protest Abortion at Planned Parenthood Clinic
- US Congress Passes Health Care Reform Bill 218 to 215
- Newly Identified Corporate Supporters of Planned Parenthood Named
- Scottish Gay Rights Activists Found Guilty of Pedophilia Sentenced to Life Imprisonment
- Major Health Care Bill Development - Stupak Hyde Amendment Vote OK'd
- Health Care Bill Includes Monthly Abortion Premium: House Minority Leader Boehner
MORE NEWS:
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page
Last 10 Days
Archives
Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.








Back to Top