Tuesday December 5, 2006
Conservatives say they have “No Plans” to Shorten Marriage Debate
By Hilary White
OTTAWA, Canada, December 5, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The Ottawa Citizen reported today that the debate in the House of Commons on the party’s marriage motion may be a short one. Government House leader, Rob Nicholson said that only those more recently elected Members who have not had a chance to be heard on the subject in the past are likely to make speeches.
Genevive Breton, Director of Communications for Rob Nicholson, Government House Leader clarified that there is “no plan to shorten” the debate.
Breton told LifeSiteNews.com that Nicholson is meeting with House leaders today, “We’re evaluating today how many people want to speak.” She added that there is “also a possibility being looked at now to maybe go into the evening” so that as many MP’s as want to can have their say.
Nicholson said he expects the vote will come on Thursday. The motion is widely expected to fail with most of the opposition in the House supporting the change to the definition of marriage installed by the Liberal Party last year.
The motion proposes “to restore the traditional definition of marriage without affecting civil unions and while respecting existing same-sex marriages.” Should the motion pass, the over 12,000 homosexual “marriages” already registered, many from other countries, will not be affected.
“We've promised it in the last election ... and it's just one of the matters I wanted to get to before Christmas,” Nicholson told reporters.
Saying, “You don’t pick and choose rights,” the newly elected leader of the Liberal Party, Stéphane Dion, said Monday that he hopes the entire Liberal caucus votes against the motion. There is no decision on whether the Liberal Members will be allowed a free vote on this activist court imposed and then legislated new “right”.
When Bill C-38 passed, with a 158-133 vote, the traditional definition of marriage was abolished but at least one quarter of the Liberal caucus voted against the change while the entire cabinet was forced to vote for the government motion.
Latest Headlines
- Cardinal George Denounces "New Ways Ministry" as Pseudo-Catholic Organization

- Irony: 19-Child Duggar Family Renting Former Home of Local Planned Parenthood Leader

- Document Reveals Inconsistencies in ND's Jenkins Claims on ND88

- New Country Music Star Born as Pro-Life Ballad Climbs the Charts

- Future of Pontifical Academy for Life at Stake as Members Meet in Closed Door Session

- Rally Planned in Defence of Canadian Pro-Life Ad

- Commentary on February 8 News

- Chinese Human-Rights Crusaders Nominated for Nobel Peace Prize

- U.K.’s Conservative Leader Pledges Full Support to Gay Agenda

- B.C. Civil Liberties Association Goes to Bat for Pro-Life Student Club

- Police Refuse to Release Federal "Threat Assessment" on Wis. Pro-Lifers

- Canadian Human Rights Commission Appeals Ruling against Hate Messages Statute

- Homosexual Activist Keith Norton Dies at 69

- Malta Celebrates 32nd Pro-Life Day

- My Vote for Best Pro-life Super Bowl Ad: Google’s Parisian Love Story

- Pope: Family Necessary for Child Development

- Letters to the Editor

Most Read this Week
- Veterans, Former Army Legal Chief Defend “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”
- Planned Parenthood President Lands Spot on Ford Foundation Board
- Rabbis Warn against 'Disaster' of Open Homosexuality in the Military
- Football Pros Give Support to Tim Tebow Super Bowl Ad
- Clash of the Abortion Titans: Planned Parenthood Launches 'Pro-Choice' Football Ad
- Canadian Station Pulls Pro-Life Ad – Too “Graphic”
- Hijacking the Brain — How Pornography Works
- Group Exposes Media "Fraud" at March for Life
- U.S. Sisters in Crisis after Embracing “Secular Culture”: Vatican Cardinal
- NYT: Rampant Polygamy in Gay 'Marriage' May Benefit Institution
MORE NEWS:
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page
Last 10 Days
Archives
Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.








Back to Top