Wednesday February 1, 2006
35% of Christian Families Have Been Harmed By Internet Material
By Terry Vanderheyden
NICEVILLE, Florida, February 1, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) – A Christian internet filtering company is warning that many families are at risk of exposing their children to unsolicited pornography while on the internet.
American Family Online’s (AFO) Executive Director Steve Ensley told AmericanDecency.org in an interview that, “By all indications from both external and internal surveys, less than 35% of Christian families have Internet filtering of any kind.”
Ensley added that many filtering companies still allow soft porn, such as lingerie sellers and some magazines. “These sites and thousands like them are commercial sites that intentionally have erotic images and material on the sites. But the ‘popular’ filters will not filter these sites.” He also warned that homosexually explicit sites are often not blocked by filters.
Ensley reported about statistics conducted by the AFO. He revealed that 74% of 465 people surveyed had been disturbed by pornography while on the internet. A whopping 35% of respondents said they or someone in their household had been harmed by the internet. The type of harm was broken down into physical, emotional, and spiritual harm, with over half of respondents indicating that they or a family member had been harmed “emotionally” or “spiritually” by internet content. Twenty-one reported the harm as “major.”
“That percentage is higher than any other disease or morally destructive behavior in our culture today.” said Ensley. The greatest cause of harm was reported to be from pornography, at 30%. The research also revealed that almost 10% of those affected by the internet required outside help for the effects. “Equally telling, according to the survey, is the fact that two adults are harmed for every child that is harmed,” Ensley explained. “We tend to think of filtering as an issue for children. The truth is that the entire family needs protection and the survey confirms this fact.”
A large study conducted in 2002 found that pornography viewing results in a host of problems. One of the most common psychological problems is a deviant attitude towards intimate relationships such as perceptions of sexual dominance, submissiveness, sex role stereotyping or viewing persons as sexual objects. Behavioural problems include fetishes and excessive or ritualistic masturbation. Sexual aggressiveness, sexually hostile and violent behaviours are social problems as well as individual problems that are linked to pornography.
Only about half of the AFO survey respondents said that they have internet filtering software installed on their computers.
Learn more about American Family Online’s filtering services at:
http://www.afo.net
See related LifeSiteNews.com coverage:
Pornography Addiction Destroying Lives, US Senate Told
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2004/nov/04111909.html
Study Proves "Pornography Is Harmful"
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2002/mar/02031203.html
Latest Headlines
- BREAKING: US Congress Passes Health Care Reform Bill 220 - 215

- Stupak Amendment to Health Care Bill Passes 240 - 194 Saturday Evening

- Major Health Care Development - Pro-Life Stupak Amendment Vote OK'd for Today

- NY Times: Dems Banking on Later Squeezing Pro-Life Language Out of Bill in Committee

- USCCB Spokesman: "Definitely Not True" that Bishops Support Bill As it Stands

- TIME Got it Wrong - Prof. George Opposed Grandiose Kennedy Funeral

- USCCB Condemnation Tears Facade off "Phony" Abortion Compromise for Health Bill

- Health Care Bill Includes Monthly Abortion Premium: House Minority Leader Boehner

- TIME Article Setting Burke Against O'Malley Called "Tactical strike" on Behalf of Catholic Left

- Dirty Fighting on Abortion Funding: Word-Games and Health-Care Theatrics Boggle the Mind

- Commentary on November 6 News

- Note to LifeSiteNews Subscribers with Rogers email addresses

- New York Gov. Declares Nov. 10 Extraordinary Legislative Session for Same-Sex "Marriage"

- Washington's Pro-Family Amendment Effort Defeated - R-71 Almost Certain to Pass

- Vote Pushed Back on Canadian Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide Bill to Dec. 2

- Elderly U.K. Couple in Good Health Commit Suicide, Complain of Assisted Suicide Law

- Texas Late-Term Abortionist and Baptist Minister Admits: "Am I killing? Yes, I am"

- New Evidence Contradicts CCHD's Findings on Accused Pro-Abortion Partner

- Quebec Priest Denies Possibility of Sexual Reorientation Therapy on TV

- New Hampshire Same-Sex "Marriage" Law in Crosshairs after Maine's Law Crumbles

- Brooklyn Bishop Criticized for Recorded Message Praising Pro-Abortion Politician

- First Group of "Traditionalist" Anglicans in Britain Votes to Enter Catholic Church

Most Read this Week
- Planned Parenthood Director Resigns after Watching Ultrasound of Abortion Procedure
- Nun Defiant Following Rebuke, but Stops Abortion Escorting
- Breaking: Dominican Community Apologizes for Nun Caught Acting as Abortion Escort
- TIME Article Setting Burke Against O'Malley Called "Tactical strike" on Behalf of Catholics Left
- Over 200 Christendom College Students Protest Abortion at Planned Parenthood Clinic
- Newly Identified Corporate Supporters of Planned Parenthood Named
- Scottish Gay Rights Activists Found Guilty of Pedophilia Sentenced to Life Imprisonment
- US Congress Passes Health Care Reform Bill 218 to 215
- Major Health Care Bill Development - Stupak Hyde Amendment Vote OK'd
- Health Care Bill Includes Monthly Abortion Premium: House Minority Leader Boehner
MORE NEWS:
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page
Last 10 Days
Archives
Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.








Back to Top