Tuesday January 10, 2006
Pew Survey Finds Opinion Divided on Physician Assisted Suicide
By Hilary White
WASHINGTON, January 10, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A Pew Research Center survey, conducted in November 2005 shows there is a nearly 50/50 split in US opinion on allowing physician-assisted suicide. Among 1,500 adults surveyed, 45% oppose the introduction of laws allowing doctors to “help patients to end their lives.”
The support for assisted suicide varied considerably depending upon the reasons given. 60% believed that a patient should be allowed to take his own life if he is “suffering great pain with no hope of improvement,” an increase from 55% in 1990. Assisted suicide because of fears of being “a burden” to family or because “life has become too burdensome,” has little support, 29% and 33% respectively, and shows little change since 1990.
61% said they feel the “mercy killing” of a spouse is always (6%) or sometimes (55%) justified, only if the spouse was “suffering terrible pain from a terminal disease.” The number of people who believe that killing a spouse is never justified has increased slightly from 20% in 1990 to 29% in 2005.
84% supported establishing laws to allow terminally ill patients to decide when to cease medical treatments and 74% agreed that a close family member should be allowed to decide when a patient has become decisionally incapacitated.
Responses differed, however, on the question of actively killing patients. Opinions on physician assisted suicide and active euthanasia are also strongly divided depending upon the respondents’ religious affiliation. 61% of white evangelical Protestants oppose laws allowing assisted suicide while those with no religion and those affiliated with mainline Protestant groups approve (62% and 65% respectively). Catholics are nearly evenly divided with 50% opposing assisted suicide and 40% approving.
60% of those polled said they believed there is such a thing as a “moral right” to commit suicide. The numbers varied slightly between men (66%) and women (54%) who believed that a patient suffering great pain with no hope of improvement has a moral right to commit suicide. 60% of Catholics agreed to this as did 73% of “mainline” Protestants and 78% of “seculars.” Only 42% of white, evangelical Protestants agreed however.
The numbers who believed that “every effort” should be made to save the lives of “severely handicapped” infants has increased significantly since 1990. 59% of women responded that disabled infants should be treated, up from 47% in 1990. The numbers also increased slightly with Catholics (57% to 63%) and white evangelical Protestants (60% to 68%). African Americans (84%) and younger respondents (70%) are more likely than others to favor providing as much treatment as possible.
Latest Headlines
- Cardinal Rigali: You Can't Claim to be "Reducing Abortions" but Publicly Funding them in D.C.

- General Electric to Use Embryonic Stem Cells for Testing, Phase out Lab Rats

- Ohio Supreme Court Allows Planned Parenthood to Conceal Abortion Records in Sexual Abuse Case

- LifeSiteNews Canada Day and Independence Day Message. Taking a few days off. LSN returns Monday July 6

- Heroically Pro-Life Brazilian Archbishop's Resignation Accepted Under Cloud of Vatican Newspaper Misrepresentation

- Pro-Life Groups Announce New Colorado Personhood Initiative

- Judge Puts Kibosh on DC Gay "Marriage" Referendum

- Al Franken Win Hands Supermajority to Senate Democrats

- Group Funded by Canadian Bishops' D&P Joins with Others to Denounce the "Natural Family" and "Family Rights"

- Financially Troubled Planned Parenthood of El Paso Closes Doors

- Abortion Linked to Subsequent Pre-Term Births, New Research Again Confirms

- New Orleans Homosexual Couple Ask Fed. Court to Overturn Marriage Amendment

- Slim Hope Of New Ontario Progressive Conservative Party Leader Promoting Pro-Life, Pro-Family Issues

- Pope Accepts Resignation of Bishop Caught Involved in Homosexual Encounters

- Young Children Removed from UK Schools for "Inappropriate Sexual Behaviour"

- Northern Ireland Politician Cleared of Wrongdoing after Reiterating Christian Teaching on Homosexual Acts

- UK Conservative Leader Speaks at Gay Pride Fundraiser

- More Letters to the Editor on Canadian Catholic Development and Peace Scandal (July 1)

- Letters to the Editor - Readers Respond to Development and Peace Scandal

- Watch This Dramatic New Video on Catholic Bishops Conference Funding of Pro-Abortion Groups

Most Read this Week
- Homosexual Duke U. Director Charged with Offering Adopted 5-Year-Old for Sex
- Famed Fr. Corapi Calls Canadian Bishops' Dissent from Humanae Vitae "Catastrophic"
- Pope: It is a Childish Faith to Oppose the Church Teaching on Life and Family
- Heroically Pro-Life Brazilian Archbishop's Resignation Accepted Under Cloud of Vatican Newspaper Misrepresentation
- LifeSiteNews Detailed Response to Canadian Bishops' Whitewash Report on Development and Peace
- Young Children Removed from UK Schools for "Inappropriate Sexual Behaviour"
- General Electric to Use Embryonic Stem Cells for Testing, Phase Out Lab Rats
- Is Pro-Choice the New Pro-Life?
- Swedish Parents Won't Tell if Child is Boy or Girl as Gender Experiment
- Cardinal Rigali: You Can't Claim to be "Reducing Abortions" but Publicly Funding them in D.C.
MORE NEWS:
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page
Last 10 Days
Archives
Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.







Back to Top