Tuesday July 4, 2006
Supreme Court Intervenes to Save the Mt. Soledad Cross
SAN
DIEGO, CA, July 4, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) – The U.S. Supreme
Court intervened Monday to save the 43-foot cross, the centerpiece of a
national veterans memorial, atop of Mt. Soledad in San Diego
California. A lower court judge had ordered the City of San Diego to
remove the cross by August 1st or face fines of $5,000 a day
thereafter.
However, after the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals refused to stay the
lower court order, the Thomas More Law Center filed an emergency
application for stay on behalf of San Diegans for the Mt. Soledad
National War Memorial, the organization that spearheaded the highly
successful referendary petition drive that kept the cross from being
removed in 2005. The Emergency Application For Stay was filed with
Associate Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, who issued Monday’s stay order.
The Thomas More Law Center is a national public interest law firm based
in Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Richard Thompson, President and Chief Counsel for the Thomas More Law
Center commented, “This is great news for our veterans and fallen war
heroes on this Fourth of July eve.”
The Law Center’s emergency application explained that this case
presents a serious question regarding the place of religious symbols in
the public life of our nation.
Robert Muise, the Law Center Trial Counsel who authored the emergency
application, also argued that the Mt. Soledad Cross case would give the
Court an opportunity to revisit its Establishment Clause jurisprudence,
which many on the Court have noted is in need of substantial revision.
Muise explained, “It would be a national tragedy to tear down the
memorial cross. It would cause irreparable harm to the citizens of San
Diego, and the many family members, friends, and comrades of the nearly
two thousand veterans who are honored by this memorial for their
sacrificial service to this country.”
Charles LiMandri, the West Coast Regional Director for the Thomas More
Law Center, whose office is located in San Diego, commented, “Justice
Kennedy’s order granting a stay is great news. The Mt. Soledad Cross
and Memorial represents the sacrifices our veterans and their families
have made and the gratitude that we, as a community and a nation, have
for them.”
The Supreme Court normally considers three factors when deciding
whether to grant a stay, namely, whether there is a reasonable
probability that four Members of the Court will consider the issue
sufficiently meritorious to grant certiorari, whether there is a fair
prospect that five justices will conclude that the case was erroneously
decided and whether there is likely irreparable damage if the stay is
denied.
Justice Kennedy also granted the City of San Diego’s application for a
stay. The City had previously indicated that unless the legal situation
changed, it would comply with the lower court order to remove the
cross.
In addition to the numerous legal steps the Law Center is taking to
prevent removal of the memorial cross by August 1st, the Law Center is
also asking all Americans to join in the effort to urge President Bush
to immediately use the federal powers of eminent domain to take the
land on which the cross and memorial sit by signing a petition to the
President contained on its website at: http://www.thomasmore.org.
Latest Headlines
- Cardinal Rigali: You Can't Claim to be "Reducing Abortions" but Publicly Funding them in D.C.

- General Electric to Use Embryonic Stem Cells for Testing, Phase out Lab Rats

- Ohio Supreme Court Allows Planned Parenthood to Conceal Abortion Records in Sexual Abuse Case

- LifeSiteNews Canada Day and Independence Day Message. Taking a few days off. LSN returns Monday July 6

- Heroically Pro-Life Brazilian Archbishop's Resignation Accepted Under Cloud of Vatican Newspaper Misrepresentation

- Pro-Life Groups Announce New Colorado Personhood Initiative

- Judge Puts Kibosh on DC Gay "Marriage" Referendum

- Al Franken Win Hands Supermajority to Senate Democrats

- Group Funded by Canadian Bishops' D&P Joins with Others to Denounce the "Natural Family" and "Family Rights"

- Financially Troubled Planned Parenthood of El Paso Closes Doors

- Abortion Linked to Subsequent Pre-Term Births, New Research Again Confirms

- New Orleans Homosexual Couple Ask Fed. Court to Overturn Marriage Amendment

- Slim Hope Of New Ontario Progressive Conservative Party Leader Promoting Pro-Life, Pro-Family Issues

- Pope Accepts Resignation of Bishop Caught Involved in Homosexual Encounters

- Young Children Removed from UK Schools for "Inappropriate Sexual Behaviour"

- Northern Ireland Politician Cleared of Wrongdoing after Reiterating Christian Teaching on Homosexual Acts

- UK Conservative Leader Speaks at Gay Pride Fundraiser

- More Letters to the Editor on Canadian Catholic Development and Peace Scandal (July 1)

- Letters to the Editor - Readers Respond to Development and Peace Scandal

- Watch This Dramatic New Video on Catholic Bishops Conference Funding of Pro-Abortion Groups

Most Read this Week
- Homosexual Duke U. Director Charged with Offering Adopted 5-Year-Old for Sex
- Famed Fr. Corapi Calls Canadian Bishops' Dissent from Humanae Vitae "Catastrophic"
- Pope: It is a Childish Faith to Oppose the Church Teaching on Life and Family
- Heroically Pro-Life Brazilian Archbishop's Resignation Accepted Under Cloud of Vatican Newspaper Misrepresentation
- LifeSiteNews Detailed Response to Canadian Bishops' Whitewash Report on Development and Peace
- Young Children Removed from UK Schools for "Inappropriate Sexual Behaviour"
- General Electric to Use Embryonic Stem Cells for Testing, Phase Out Lab Rats
- Is Pro-Choice the New Pro-Life?
- Swedish Parents Won't Tell if Child is Boy or Girl as Gender Experiment
- Cardinal Rigali: You Can't Claim to be "Reducing Abortions" but Publicly Funding them in D.C.
MORE NEWS:
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page
Last 10 Days
Archives
Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.







Back to Top