Friday May 26, 2006
To Amnesty International: As a Person of Colour I Oppose the Discrimination Against the Unborn
Editorial
By John-Henry Westen
Editor
LifeSiteNews.com
Amnesty International's proposal to include abortion as one of the human rights for which the noted organization campaigns would for the first time pit the organization against human rights - the rights of unborn children to life.
The child in the womb, with fingers and toes, nose and mouth, who hears and feels pain is every bit as human as you and I, and as deserving of human rights. In Shakespeare's Merchant of Venice, the Jewish character Shylock pleas for his personhood saying, "If you prick us do we not bleed?" Indeed, as most have seen in the bloody pictures of abortion, those unborn children do bleed.
If Amnesty includes abortion as a 'sexual right' as they've proposed and asks governments to 'punish' those who would impede those so-called 'rights' then Amnesty would find itself working to shut down the pro-life movement, and all persons who believe in the right to life for the unborn.
Amnesty should get with the human rights movement of the 21st century, and take a look at rights for the unborn. Around the world people are waking up to the need to protect the right to life of unborn children. Even in Canada, where abortion is legally performed at taxpayers expense up to and including the ninth month of pregnancy, a majority of Canadians favour at least some legal protection for unborn children.
Amnesty would also be hurting its own base by advocating for abortion. Many churches which support Amnesty in its laudable goals would balk at Amnesty's proposed new direction. Although it is not commonly known, many of us in the pro-life movement are here specifically because we are human rights activists.
I once had the opportunity to explain that to a 'pro-choice' activist face to face. At a pro-life conference I attended a couple of years ago, a group of protesters were marching in front of the hotel where we were gathered. I went out to speak with the protesters to hear their concerns. The first few I tried to chat with refused saying, "I don't speak with ***". However, the organizer, a young woman in her late teens or early twenties, agreed to talk.
A little group appeared, and a cameraman from the group of protesters was on hand to film the exchange. "How dare you, as a man," she began, "tell me what I can do with my body." She continued on the same course for about a minute. After politely allowing her a full explanation of her position, I offered my own.
I said something like, "As a person of colour, I've fought discrimination all my life. As an adult I continue to fight discrimination not only against myself but also discrimination directed against those who are unable to defend themselves. Just as I fight discrimination based on race, I fight unjust discrimination based on age, size and dependency.
"Everyone recalls from bio class that when the sperm and egg meet a new life is formed. In the case of human sperm and egg, that new life is a human being, like you and me.
"Yes she is very small, yes she is very young, yes she is very dependent, however that embryonic child is deserving of basic human rights like you and me. I don't tolerate unjust discrimination based on age, size and dependency, thus I don't tolerate the intentional ending of the lives of unborn children.
"Sticking up for those discriminated against in a culture where discrimination is prominent can make you unpopular. But that didn't stop me from sticking up for people of colour like myself and that won't stop me from defending unborn children."
Latest Headlines
- Cardinal Rigali: You Can't Claim to be "Reducing Abortions" but Publicly Funding them in D.C.

- General Electric to Use Embryonic Stem Cells for Testing, Phase out Lab Rats

- Ohio Supreme Court Allows Planned Parenthood to Conceal Abortion Records in Sexual Abuse Case

- LifeSiteNews Canada Day and Independence Day Message. Taking a few days off. LSN returns Monday July 6

- Heroically Pro-Life Brazilian Archbishop's Resignation Accepted Under Cloud of Vatican Newspaper Misrepresentation

- Pro-Life Groups Announce New Colorado Personhood Initiative

- Judge Puts Kibosh on DC Gay "Marriage" Referendum

- Al Franken Win Hands Supermajority to Senate Democrats

- Group Funded by Canadian Bishops' D&P Joins with Others to Denounce the "Natural Family" and "Family Rights"

- Financially Troubled Planned Parenthood of El Paso Closes Doors

- Abortion Linked to Subsequent Pre-Term Births, New Research Again Confirms

- New Orleans Homosexual Couple Ask Fed. Court to Overturn Marriage Amendment

- Slim Hope Of New Ontario Progressive Conservative Party Leader Promoting Pro-Life, Pro-Family Issues

- Pope Accepts Resignation of Bishop Caught Involved in Homosexual Encounters

- Young Children Removed from UK Schools for "Inappropriate Sexual Behaviour"

- Northern Ireland Politician Cleared of Wrongdoing after Reiterating Christian Teaching on Homosexual Acts

- UK Conservative Leader Speaks at Gay Pride Fundraiser

- More Letters to the Editor on Canadian Catholic Development and Peace Scandal (July 1)

- Letters to the Editor - Readers Respond to Development and Peace Scandal

- Watch This Dramatic New Video on Catholic Bishops Conference Funding of Pro-Abortion Groups

Most Read this Week
- Homosexual Duke U. Director Charged with Offering Adopted 5-Year-Old for Sex
- Famed Fr. Corapi Calls Canadian Bishops' Dissent from Humanae Vitae "Catastrophic"
- Pope: It is a Childish Faith to Oppose the Church Teaching on Life and Family
- LifeSiteNews Detailed Response to Canadian Bishops' Whitewash Report on Development and Peace
- Heroically Pro-Life Brazilian Archbishop's Resignation Accepted Under Cloud of Vatican Newspaper Misrepresentation
- Young Children Removed from UK Schools for "Inappropriate Sexual Behaviour"
- Is Pro-Choice the New Pro-Life?
- General Electric to Use Embryonic Stem Cells for Testing, Phase Out Lab Rats
- Swedish Parents Won't Tell if Child is Boy or Girl as Gender Experiment
- Cardinal Rigali: You Can't Claim to be "Reducing Abortions" but Publicly Funding them in D.C.
MORE NEWS:
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page
Last 10 Days
Archives
Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.







Back to Top