Wednesday October 25, 2006
New Jersey Supreme Court Orders State to Give Homosexuals All Benefits of “Marriage” Except the Name “Marriage”
Leaves Decision of What to call such Unions up to Legislature
By Hilary White
TRENTON, October 25, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) – In a 4-3 decision, the Supreme Court of New Jersey ruled today that homosexuals in “committed” relationships must be granted the same benefits of married couples, but declined to name the relationship “marriage.”
Justice Albin, writing on behalf of the New Jersey, opined that denying “committed same-sex couples” the full “financial and social benefits and privileges” of marriage “bears no substantial relationship to a legitimate governmental purpose.”
The Court ruled “that under the equal protection guarantee of…the New Jersey Constitution, committed same sex couples must be afforded on equal terms the same rights and benefits enjoyed by opposite-sex couples under the civil marriage statutes.”
The decision overturned two lower court decisions in favour of a group of homosexuals who had campaigned to put an end to statutory marriage in New Jersey through the courts. Members of the group had pursued a lawsuit after they were refused marriage licenses alleging that this violated the New Jersey state constitution.
The ruling equated the preservation of marriage with “discrimination” in language that mirrored perfectly the homosexual propaganda. “Times and attitudes have changed. There has been a developing understanding that discrimination against gays and lesbians is no longer acceptable in this State.”
The Court allowed the democratic legislature the privilege of deciding what to call the “statutory scheme,” whether “marriage” or something else.
Concerned Women for America, the organization that had campaigned to preserve marriage in New Jersey, said the case was a “textbook” example of an activist group using the “agenda-driven” judges and courts to overturn and subvert the legislative process.
CWA’s Chief Counsel Jan LaRue said that the court ignored 28 statute sections that include references to the term 'married woman' and 'married man' and the term 'husband and wife.'
LaRue warned that because New Jersey has no residency requirement for marriage the state was carefully chosen as a test case. “If the legislature caves in to the court, it could open the door for lawsuits challenging every state’s marriage law.”
Wendy Wright, CWA’s President pointed to the court’s lack of concern for children, saying, “The thirty-year experiment of treating marriage as expendable, by making divorce easy and children fatherless, has proven to be a disaster for women, children and society.”
“This should provide enough evidence for courts and legislators to quit abusing marriage by pretending it is less important or demanding than it is.
Many defenders of marriage have pointed out that the interests of homosexuals in pursuing their political agenda has left children the forgotten baggage of the war. “We should not be forced, or children subjected to, another social experiment with marriage simply to make individuals personally satisfied,” Wendy Wright said.
Read the New Jersey Supreme Court Ruling (Adobe required):
http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/opinions/supreme/a-68-05.pdf
Read related LifeSiteNews.com coverage:
"Same Sex Marriage Harms Children's Rights" Marriage Symposium Hears
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2006/sep/06092110.html
Latest Headlines
- Cardinal Rigali: You Can't Claim to be "Reducing Abortions" but Publicly Funding them in D.C.

- General Electric to Use Embryonic Stem Cells for Testing, Phase out Lab Rats

- Ohio Supreme Court Allows Planned Parenthood to Conceal Abortion Records in Sexual Abuse Case

- LifeSiteNews Canada Day and Independence Day Message. Taking a few days off. LSN returns Monday July 6

- Heroically Pro-Life Brazilian Archbishop's Resignation Accepted Under Cloud of Vatican Newspaper Misrepresentation

- Pro-Life Groups Announce New Colorado Personhood Initiative

- Judge Puts Kibosh on DC Gay "Marriage" Referendum

- Al Franken Win Hands Supermajority to Senate Democrats

- Group Funded by Canadian Bishops' D&P Joins with Others to Denounce the "Natural Family" and "Family Rights"

- Financially Troubled Planned Parenthood of El Paso Closes Doors

- Abortion Linked to Subsequent Pre-Term Births, New Research Again Confirms

- New Orleans Homosexual Couple Ask Fed. Court to Overturn Marriage Amendment

- Slim Hope Of New Ontario Progressive Conservative Party Leader Promoting Pro-Life, Pro-Family Issues

- Pope Accepts Resignation of Bishop Caught Involved in Homosexual Encounters

- Young Children Removed from UK Schools for "Inappropriate Sexual Behaviour"

- Northern Ireland Politician Cleared of Wrongdoing after Reiterating Christian Teaching on Homosexual Acts

- UK Conservative Leader Speaks at Gay Pride Fundraiser

- More Letters to the Editor on Canadian Catholic Development and Peace Scandal (July 1)

- Letters to the Editor - Readers Respond to Development and Peace Scandal

- Watch This Dramatic New Video on Catholic Bishops Conference Funding of Pro-Abortion Groups

Most Read this Week
- Homosexual Duke U. Director Charged with Offering Adopted 5-Year-Old for Sex
- Famed Fr. Corapi Calls Canadian Bishops' Dissent from Humanae Vitae "Catastrophic"
- Pope: It is a Childish Faith to Oppose the Church Teaching on Life and Family
- LifeSiteNews Detailed Response to Canadian Bishops' Whitewash Report on Development and Peace
- Heroically Pro-Life Brazilian Archbishop's Resignation Accepted Under Cloud of Vatican Newspaper Misrepresentation
- Young Children Removed from UK Schools for "Inappropriate Sexual Behaviour"
- Is Pro-Choice the New Pro-Life?
- General Electric to Use Embryonic Stem Cells for Testing, Phase Out Lab Rats
- Swedish Parents Won't Tell if Child is Boy or Girl as Gender Experiment
- Cardinal Rigali: You Can't Claim to be "Reducing Abortions" but Publicly Funding them in D.C.
MORE NEWS:
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page
Last 10 Days
Archives
Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.







Back to Top