Thursday September 14, 2006
Saskatchewan Catholic Hospital Under Legal Threat for Discontinuing Tubal Ligations
Ideologues angry
By Hilary White
HUMBOLDT, Saskatchewan, September 13, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) – St. Elizabeth’s Catholic hospital in rural Saskatchewan was in meetings today with the bishop and the Saskatchewan Catholic Health Corporation after taking the step of permanently banning the sterilization of women by tubal ligation.
The hospital decided on the ban citing their intention to move the facility’s policies closer to Catholic health care ethics guidelines. Other hospitals in the area, such as Saskatoon’s City Hospital, an hours drive from St. Elizabeth’s, are still offering the procedure.
St. Elizabeth’s move has made the hospital the object of harsh criticism in circles accustomed to Catholic health care facilities following the secularist trends. A local news talk radio program quoted Dr. Daniel Kirchgesner, who had performed the procedure before the hospital cancelled it, thundering that it is an “inherent right for women” to have themselves sterilized.
The CBC interviewed Dr. Carrie Levick-Brown, a local family physician who is launching a petition to convince the hospital to overturn the ban. Levick-Brown said she was in a state of “shock and disbelief” that a Catholic hospital would be interested in following Catholic teaching on health care.
The CBC also quoted Saskatchewan’s NDP Health Minister, Len Taylor saying that he is awaiting further information about the situation. Taylor said that while the government wants to continue in a good relationship with St. Elizabeth’s, “we are responsible for providing equitable care to Saskatchewan people right across the province.”
In response, Monica Beavis, president of the Saskatchewan Catholic Health Corporation, (SCHC), speaking to LifeSiteNews.com, quoted Section 38 of the regional health services act, that says “nothing precludes” St. Elizabeth’s from providing health care according to the teaching of the Catholic Church.
Beavis explained that the SCHC has the mandate under the act to decide hospital policy while the funding continues to be public. “We have the mandate from the Sisters of St. Elizabeth, to provide health care according to the Catholic teaching,” she said.
Beavis said there are a number of ways that St. Elizabeth’s can provide needed health services to the area without violating their Catholic mandate.
“We are looking at this as a teaching opportunity,” to inform the Health Minister and the public about the reasons behind Catholic prohibitions against sterilization.
“We want to meet with the Health Minister to identify the principles we abide by, to clarify and educate the rationale behind our decisions as regards Catholic teaching,” Beavis said.
James Roche, spokesman for the Catholic Health Association of Canada (CHAC), told LifeSiteNews.com that his organization has some concerns that this case, the first of its kind in Canada, could be leading up to a legal clash.
“In some cases in the US, the conflict has posed a real difficulty for Catholic hospitals,” Roche said. “In such areas as obstetrics and gynecology, with sterilizations, some hospitals have been put into situations where serious challenges are raised. Can we continue to provide Catholic health services?”
St. Elizabeth’s is aware of the possible threat of legal action either through the courts or the Human Rights Commission. Monica Beavis told LifeSiteNews.com, “We consulted with a human rights lawyer before the board made the unanimous decision to go with the recommendation of a permanent ban on tubal ligations while maintaining other obstetrical services.”
“We anticipated this trouble, we didn’t think it would come to this degree. But again, we had the [bishop] involved, the legal opinion from a [human] rights lawyer and the CEO thoroughly explained it to the doctors.”
In fact, Beavis said, the hospital has always had a prohibition on the procedure, but doctors were “non-compliant.”
The doctors were flouting the hospital’s existing rules, said Beavis. “The problem is that the doctors feel that it is their right to provide services in a secular society to women. They feel we are infringing on their rights to practice, but there are a lot of places a woman can get this service. We are interested in providing as many services as we can within the guidelines of Catholic ethics.”
The hospital will be consulting with the various medical authorities to see what services it can provide to the community and will be issuing a public statement tomorrow.
“Small rural hopsitals can’t provide all possible services. A lot of services need to be addressed, other than the small number that this group of doctors are harping on.” Beavis said.
See related story:
Catholic Ethicists Decry Overblown “Rights Rhetoric” in Tubal Ligation Media Flap
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2006/sep/06091408.html
Latest Headlines
- BREAKING: US Congress Passes Health Care Reform Bill 220 to 215

- Stupak Amendment to Health Care Bill Passes 240 - 194 Saturday Evening

- Major Health Care Development - Pro-Life Stupak Amendment Vote OK'd for Today

- NY Times: Dems Banking on Later Squeezing Pro-Life Language Out of Bill in Committee

- USCCB Spokesman: "Definitely Not True" that Bishops Support Bill As it Stands

- TIME Got it Wrong - Prof. George Opposed Grandiose Kennedy Funeral

- USCCB Condemnation Tears Facade off "Phony" Abortion Compromise for Health Bill

- Health Care Bill Includes Monthly Abortion Premium: House Minority Leader Boehner

- TIME Article Setting Burke Against O'Malley Called "Tactical strike" on Behalf of Catholic Left

- Dirty Fighting on Abortion Funding: Word-Games and Health-Care Theatrics Boggle the Mind

- Commentary on November 6 News

- Note to LifeSiteNews Subscribers with Rogers email addresses

- New York Gov. Declares Nov. 10 Extraordinary Legislative Session for Same-Sex "Marriage"

- Washington's Pro-Family Amendment Effort Defeated - R-71 Almost Certain to Pass

- Vote Pushed Back on Canadian Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide Bill to Dec. 2

- Elderly U.K. Couple in Good Health Commit Suicide, Complain of Assisted Suicide Law

- Texas Late-Term Abortionist and Baptist Minister Admits: "Am I killing? Yes, I am"

- New Evidence Contradicts CCHD's Findings on Accused Pro-Abortion Partner

- Quebec Priest Denies Possibility of Sexual Reorientation Therapy on TV

- New Hampshire Same-Sex "Marriage" Law in Crosshairs after Maine's Law Crumbles

- Brooklyn Bishop Criticized for Recorded Message Praising Pro-Abortion Politician

- First Group of "Traditionalist" Anglicans in Britain Votes to Enter Catholic Church

Most Read this Week
- Planned Parenthood Director Resigns after Watching Ultrasound of Abortion Procedure
- Nun Defiant Following Rebuke, but Stops Abortion Escorting
- Breaking: Dominican Community Apologizes for Nun Caught Acting as Abortion Escort
- Over 200 Christendom College Students Protest Abortion at Planned Parenthood Clinic
- TIME Article Setting Burke Against O'Malley Called "Tactical strike" on Behalf of Catholics Left
- Scottish Gay Rights Activists Found Guilty of Pedophilia Sentenced to Life Imprisonment
- Newly Identified Corporate Supporters of Planned Parenthood Named
- US Congress Passes Health Care Reform Bill 218 to 215
- Major Health Care Bill Development - Stupak Hyde Amendment Vote OK'd
- Health Care Bill Includes Monthly Abortion Premium: House Minority Leader Boehner
MORE NEWS:
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page
Last 10 Days
Archives
Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.








Back to Top