Thursday September 28, 2006
Don't expect the Court Challenges Program to go Quietly
Lorne Gunter warns "powerful liberal-left special interest groups" will organize usual loud protest to get it re-instated
by Lorne Gunter
Special to LifeSiteNews.com
OTTAWA, September 28, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Monday, the Conservative government announced it was cancelling the Court Challenges Program (CCP).
Expect it to die loudly, if it dies at all.
The Mulroney government cancelled it once before, in 1992. The hue and cry then was so deafening that no matter who had won the 1993 general election -- Liberal, Conservative or NDP -- the program would have been reinstated. All three parties had promised to resurrect it.
The CCP is the darling of powerful liberal-left special interest groups who are used to getting their way if they make enough noise -- notably feminists, gay-rights activists and aboriginals.
The CCP may be funded by Canadian taxpayers, but it has been taken over by the very special interest groups that are its major beneficiaries. Aided by their ideological supporters in the academic and legal communities, these "rights-seeking" advocacy organizations use the program to fund court cases whose goal is a radical interpretation of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Most of the time, when such cases get to court, these left-leaning government-funded organizations are opposed by traditionalist or right-of-centre groups who receive no tax dollars to cover their legal
expenses.
In a recent court challenge on same-sex marriage, the program funded interventions in the case by the gay rights lobby EGALE and the Canadian Coalition of Liberal Rabbis for Same-Sex Marriage. Yet despite the fact that the program is funded by taxpayers, it paid none of the fees of the lawyers representing citizens' groups opposed to changing the traditional definition of marriage.
Indeed, the CCP has never funded any cases other than those brought by leftist special interests in its 21 years of underwriting challenges to the Charter's equality provisions.
Admittedly, it's not entirely easy to tell who the CCP funds or how much it gives them because after the Liberals restored the program more than a decade ago, they turned it into an arms-length corporation.
In a letter responding to a column I'd written three weeks ago urging the government to kill the Court Challenges Program, CCP chairman Guy Matte wrote: "The program is completely accountable to the Canadian people and to government."
Not quite. When the Liberals remade it, they also put it beyond the reach of Access to Information legislation.
Now all the CCP's annual reports are required to show are which cases the program has helped pay for -- not which organizations' lawyers received money, nor what amounts. The program hides behind claims of solicitor-client privilege to keep from having to tell Canadians those details.
Mr. Matte also trotted out the favourite canard of CCP defenders -- that the program is needed to help the disadvantaged and vulnerable bring cases that protect their rights.
"The program funds claims that otherwise would never be heard," he asserted, "while the other side is defended by the government, which has unlimited resources to defend the law, policy and/or practice in question."
That's not entirely accurate, either.
When the Liberal government's lawyers offered any opposition to arguments favoured by CCP-funded organizations, that opposition was usually half-hearted. And typically in cases involving women's or gays' rights, Ottawa lawyers have been on the same side as the CCP's, meaning those opposed to the activist stances taken by CCP groups have been up against the millions in tax dollars the CCP doles out annually and the government's "unlimited resources."
The activist organizations that run CCP like that imbalance just the way it is, too, thank you very much. They don't want to have to go to court with only the same resources as the citizen groups that oppose them -- that is, with only those resources they can raise from their members.
They have come to see themselves as entitled to the taxpayers' money because they have told themselves over and over that they are standing up for the weak and powerless. Even though the CCP's two biggest beneficiaries -- the Women's Legal Education and Action Fund and the gay-rights group EGALE -- are among the most powerful rights lobbies in the country, the CCP's defenders have convinced themselves their program is the little guy's only champion.
So now that the Conservatives have ordered the CCP closed, expect Canada's legal, academic and special-interest establishments to scream to keep it open.
Let's hope Stephen Harper ignores the screaming and does the right thing.
This article originally appeared in the National Post Sept. 27.
It has been re-published, with a subsequent item correction, on LifeSiteNews.com with permission of the author.
Latest Headlines
- "Manhattan Declaration" Embodies U.S. Christian Pushback against Abortion, Same-Sex "Marriage"

- Hoffman Loses Final Tally of NY-23 Race; Alleges ACORN Tampering and Fraud

- Abortion Activist Judge Hamilton Confirmed with Help of Ten Republican Senators

- CDC Reverses Gardasil Vaccine Requirement for Immigrants

- Germany Faces Economic Downturn with Plummeting Birth Rate and Aging Population

- CCHD in Archdiocese of Chicago Says it is Working to Fix Problems

- Rejection of Washington DC Marriage Referendum Challenged With Legal Suit

- Obama-Supporting Homosexual Activist to Out Sexually Involved Priests Unless they Support Gay 'Marriage

- Austrian Catholic Bishops Issue Bland Response to Govt's Homosexual Partnership Bill

- Interim Report on Catholic Sex-Abuse Says "Homosexual Identity" Not a Predictor of Sex Abuse

- Commentary on Nov 20 NewsBytes

- LSN NewsBytes - US Health Care Reform

- LSN NewsBytes - Catholic Campaign for Human Development (CCHD)

- LSN NewsBytes - Life Issues, Religion, Swine Flu, US Politics, Sarah Palin, Miscellaneous

- LSN NewsBytes - Climate Change/Global Warming

- 59 Bishops Contributed Financially to Maine Bishop's Effort to Oppose Maine Same-Sex "Marriage" Law

- Pro-Abortion Lawmakers Shower Praise on Senate Bill's Phony Abortion Compromise

Most Read this Week
- Largest U.S. Homosexual Publisher Shuts Down, Closing Major Gay Newspapers
- EWTN's Arroyo Hosts Reform CCHD Reps Who Reveal Shocking Evidence Against USCCB Anti-Poverty Arm
- Italian Mayors Order Crufixes Put in Classrooms in Revolt against European Court Ruling
- Nat'l Organization for Marriage Responds to Miss California "Sex Tape" Scandal
- Obama Evades Questioning on Stupak Amendment in FOX Interview
- "Manhattan Declaration" Embodies U.S. Christian Pushback against Abortion, Same-Sex "Marriage"
- French Judge Finds Hospital Guilty of "Unreasonable Obstinacy" in Saving Newborn's Life
- EU Leaders to Choose President today in Secret "Soviet Style" Meetings
- Hoffman "Unconcedes" Battle for NY-23: Recount Provides Hope for "Miracle" Victory
- CCHD Responds to Reform Movement
MORE NEWS:
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page
Last 10 Days
Archives
Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.








Back to Top