Thursday September 28, 2006
Don't expect the Court Challenges Program to go Quietly
Lorne Gunter warns "powerful liberal-left special interest groups" will organize usual loud protest to get it re-instated
by Lorne Gunter
Special to LifeSiteNews.com
OTTAWA, September 28, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Monday, the Conservative government announced it was cancelling the Court Challenges Program (CCP).
Expect it to die loudly, if it dies at all.
The Mulroney government cancelled it once before, in 1992. The hue and cry then was so deafening that no matter who had won the 1993 general election -- Liberal, Conservative or NDP -- the program would have been reinstated. All three parties had promised to resurrect it.
The CCP is the darling of powerful liberal-left special interest groups who are used to getting their way if they make enough noise -- notably feminists, gay-rights activists and aboriginals.
The CCP may be funded by Canadian taxpayers, but it has been taken over by the very special interest groups that are its major beneficiaries. Aided by their ideological supporters in the academic and legal communities, these "rights-seeking" advocacy organizations use the program to fund court cases whose goal is a radical interpretation of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Most of the time, when such cases get to court, these left-leaning government-funded organizations are opposed by traditionalist or right-of-centre groups who receive no tax dollars to cover their legal
expenses.
In a recent court challenge on same-sex marriage, the program funded interventions in the case by the gay rights lobby EGALE and the Canadian Coalition of Liberal Rabbis for Same-Sex Marriage. Yet despite the fact that the program is funded by taxpayers, it paid none of the fees of the lawyers representing citizens' groups opposed to changing the traditional definition of marriage.
Indeed, the CCP has never funded any cases other than those brought by leftist special interests in its 21 years of underwriting challenges to the Charter's equality provisions.
Admittedly, it's not entirely easy to tell who the CCP funds or how much it gives them because after the Liberals restored the program more than a decade ago, they turned it into an arms-length corporation.
In a letter responding to a column I'd written three weeks ago urging the government to kill the Court Challenges Program, CCP chairman Guy Matte wrote: "The program is completely accountable to the Canadian people and to government."
Not quite. When the Liberals remade it, they also put it beyond the reach of Access to Information legislation.
Now all the CCP's annual reports are required to show are which cases the program has helped pay for -- not which organizations' lawyers received money, nor what amounts. The program hides behind claims of solicitor-client privilege to keep from having to tell Canadians those details.
Mr. Matte also trotted out the favourite canard of CCP defenders -- that the program is needed to help the disadvantaged and vulnerable bring cases that protect their rights.
"The program funds claims that otherwise would never be heard," he asserted, "while the other side is defended by the government, which has unlimited resources to defend the law, policy and/or practice in question."
That's not entirely accurate, either.
When the Liberal government's lawyers offered any opposition to arguments favoured by CCP-funded organizations, that opposition was usually half-hearted. And typically in cases involving women's or gays' rights, Ottawa lawyers have been on the same side as the CCP's, meaning those opposed to the activist stances taken by CCP groups have been up against the millions in tax dollars the CCP doles out annually and the government's "unlimited resources."
The activist organizations that run CCP like that imbalance just the way it is, too, thank you very much. They don't want to have to go to court with only the same resources as the citizen groups that oppose them -- that is, with only those resources they can raise from their members.
They have come to see themselves as entitled to the taxpayers' money because they have told themselves over and over that they are standing up for the weak and powerless. Even though the CCP's two biggest beneficiaries -- the Women's Legal Education and Action Fund and the gay-rights group EGALE -- are among the most powerful rights lobbies in the country, the CCP's defenders have convinced themselves their program is the little guy's only champion.
So now that the Conservatives have ordered the CCP closed, expect Canada's legal, academic and special-interest establishments to scream to keep it open.
Let's hope Stephen Harper ignores the screaming and does the right thing.
This article originally appeared in the National Post Sept. 27.
It has been re-published, with a subsequent item correction, on LifeSiteNews.com with permission of the author.
Latest Headlines
- BREAKING: US Congress Passes Health Care Reform Bill 220 to 215

- Stupak Amendment to Health Care Bill Passes 240 - 194 Saturday Evening

- Major Health Care Development - Pro-Life Stupak Amendment Vote OK'd for Today

- NY Times: Dems Banking on Later Squeezing Pro-Life Language Out of Bill in Committee

- USCCB Spokesman: "Definitely Not True" that Bishops Support Bill As it Stands

- TIME Got it Wrong - Prof. George Opposed Grandiose Kennedy Funeral

- USCCB Condemnation Tears Facade off "Phony" Abortion Compromise for Health Bill

- Health Care Bill Includes Monthly Abortion Premium: House Minority Leader Boehner

- TIME Article Setting Burke Against O'Malley Called "Tactical strike" on Behalf of Catholic Left

- Dirty Fighting on Abortion Funding: Word-Games and Health-Care Theatrics Boggle the Mind

- Commentary on November 6 News

- Note to LifeSiteNews Subscribers with Rogers email addresses

- New York Gov. Declares Nov. 10 Extraordinary Legislative Session for Same-Sex "Marriage"

- Washington's Pro-Family Amendment Effort Defeated - R-71 Almost Certain to Pass

- Vote Pushed Back on Canadian Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide Bill to Dec. 2

- Elderly U.K. Couple in Good Health Commit Suicide, Complain of Assisted Suicide Law

- Texas Late-Term Abortionist and Baptist Minister Admits: "Am I killing? Yes, I am"

- New Evidence Contradicts CCHD's Findings on Accused Pro-Abortion Partner

- Quebec Priest Denies Possibility of Sexual Reorientation Therapy on TV

- New Hampshire Same-Sex "Marriage" Law in Crosshairs after Maine's Law Crumbles

- Brooklyn Bishop Criticized for Recorded Message Praising Pro-Abortion Politician

- First Group of "Traditionalist" Anglicans in Britain Votes to Enter Catholic Church

Most Read this Week
- Planned Parenthood Director Resigns after Watching Ultrasound of Abortion Procedure
- Nun Defiant Following Rebuke, but Stops Abortion Escorting
- Breaking: Dominican Community Apologizes for Nun Caught Acting as Abortion Escort
- Over 200 Christendom College Students Protest Abortion at Planned Parenthood Clinic
- TIME Article Setting Burke Against O'Malley Called "Tactical strike" on Behalf of Catholics Left
- Scottish Gay Rights Activists Found Guilty of Pedophilia Sentenced to Life Imprisonment
- Newly Identified Corporate Supporters of Planned Parenthood Named
- Major Health Care Bill Development - Stupak Hyde Amendment Vote OK'd
- Health Care Bill Includes Monthly Abortion Premium: House Minority Leader Boehner
- Canadian MP Launches Petition to Stop Federal Funding of Planned Parenthood
MORE NEWS:
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page
Last 10 Days
Archives
Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.








Back to Top