Tuesday July 31, 2007
Chinese Courts Hear Unprecedented "Family Planning" Lawsuit
By Peter J. Smith
BEIJING, July 31, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - For the first time China's judicial system has accepted a "family planning" lawsuit from a woman who says that her forced abortion seven years ago has rendered her unable to bear children.
Caijing Magazine reports that a Chinese appeals court has agreed to hear the case of Jin Yani and her husband Yang Zhongchen. The couple is suing a local department of China's State Population and Family Planning Commission, which forced Jin to undergo a brutal partial-birth abortion when she was 9 months pregnant.
Earlier in May, the Changli District Court had rejected Jin and Yang's complaint filed against the Changli Population and Family Planning Department. However the Qinhuangdao Intermediate Court overturned the verdict and agreed to rehear the case, since family planning officials had withheld evidence that showed Jin's abortion was involuntary.
According to the case, Jin and her husband were unable to obtain a timely "birth license" on account of marrying when Jin, then 20, was already more than 4 months pregnant. By the time Jin was eight months pregnant a family planning official, Di Weijun, had assured her husband Yang that he would be able to obtain the license on condition of paying a penalty.
Yang and his wife never received the license, but instead would pay a much harsher penalty than they had ever expected. On the evening of September 7, 2000, a detachment of Anshan county and Luojiaying village family planning officers arrived with no warning at the home of Jin and Yang with an order to carry out the abortion. The document was signed by none other than Di Weijun, the same man who had assured them that they could acquire the necessary license.
Yang was away, so the officers dragged Jin away to the Changli Family Planning Clinic were they aborted Jin's baby by lethal injection. Since Jin was unable to deliver her deceased and almost born child, doctors then dismembered the baby, probing Jin's womb with forceps, twisting and breaking the baby's head before removing the body.
Jin was later hospitalised for 44 days. In August 2001 Doctors at Tianjin Central Women's Hospital confirmed Jin would never be able to have children again due to the forced abortion. Beijing experts would later conclude the same.
Jin and Yang spent 7 years seeking justice until they met with Sun Maohang, a Beijing attorney who is representing the couple pro bono. Jin and Yang are seeking 290,000 yuan (38,300 USD) in compensation for medical expenses, 1 million yuan (132,000 USD) for psychological distress in addition to compensation for Jin's infertility.
"According to our understanding of the circumstances, I think this is the first instance of a planned pregnancy lawsuit admitted to the Chinese judicial system," Sun Maohang told Caijing Magazine.
He added, "No matter what the outcome, the ability of this kind of case to enter the judicial system, the acceptance into the legal realm, is already progress."
LifeSiteNews.com readers can obtain the full story as published in Caijing Magazine here:
http://www.caijing.com.cn/newcn/English/Rule/2007-07-25/25345.shtml
Latest Headlines
- US Congress Passes Health Care Reform Bill 220 - 215

- Stupak Amendment to Health Care Bill Passes 240 - 194 Saturday Evening

- NY Times: Dems Banking on Later Squeezing Pro-Life Language Out of Bill in Committee

- USCCB Spokesman: "Definitely Not True" that Bishops Support Bill As it Stands

- TIME Got it Wrong - Prof. George Opposed Grandiose Kennedy Funeral

- Major Health Care Development - Pro-Life Stupak Amendment Vote OK'd for Saturday

- USCCB Condemnation Tears Facade off "Phony" Abortion Compromise for Health Bill

- Health Care Bill Includes Monthly Abortion Premium: House Minority Leader Boehner

- TIME Article Setting Burke Against O'Malley Called "Tactical strike" on Behalf of Catholic Left

- Dirty Fighting on Abortion Funding: Word-Games and Health-Care Theatrics Boggle the Mind

- Commentary on November 6 News

- Note to LifeSiteNews Subscribers with Rogers email addresses

- New York Gov. Declares Nov. 10 Extraordinary Legislative Session for Same-Sex "Marriage"

- Washington's Pro-Family Amendment Effort Defeated - R-71 Almost Certain to Pass

- Vote Pushed Back on Canadian Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide Bill to Dec. 2

- Elderly U.K. Couple in Good Health Commit Suicide, Complain of Assisted Suicide Law

- Texas Late-Term Abortionist and Baptist Minister Admits: "Am I killing? Yes, I am"

- New Evidence Contradicts CCHD's Findings on Accused Pro-Abortion Partner

- Quebec Priest Denies Possibility of Sexual Reorientation Therapy on TV

- New Hampshire Same-Sex "Marriage" Law in Crosshairs after Maine's Law Crumbles

- Brooklyn Bishop Criticized for Recorded Message Praising Pro-Abortion Politician

- First Group of "Traditionalist" Anglicans in Britain Votes to Enter Catholic Church

Most Read this Week
- Planned Parenthood Director Resigns after Watching Ultrasound of Abortion Procedure
- Nun Defiant Following Rebuke, but Stops Abortion Escorting
- Breaking: Dominican Community Apologizes for Nun Caught Acting as Abortion Escort
- TIME Article Setting Burke Against O'Malley Called "Tactical strike" on Behalf of Catholics Left
- Over 200 Christendom College Students Protest Abortion at Planned Parenthood Clinic
- US Congress Passes Health Care Reform Bill 218 to 215
- Newly Identified Corporate Supporters of Planned Parenthood Named
- Scottish Gay Rights Activists Found Guilty of Pedophilia Sentenced to Life Imprisonment
- Major Health Care Bill Development - Stupak Hyde Amendment Vote OK'd
- Health Care Bill Includes Monthly Abortion Premium: House Minority Leader Boehner
MORE NEWS:
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page
Last 10 Days
Archives
Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.








Back to Top