Politics
Tuesday July 31, 2007
Chinese Courts Hear Unprecedented "Family Planning" Lawsuit
TODAY'S HEADLINES
E-MAIL
PRINT
By Peter J. Smith
BEIJING, July 31, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - For the first time China's judicial system has accepted a "family planning" lawsuit from a woman who says that her forced abortion seven years ago has rendered her unable to bear children.
Caijing Magazine reports that a Chinese appeals court has agreed to hear the case of Jin Yani and her husband Yang Zhongchen. The couple is suing a local department of China's State Population and Family Planning Commission, which forced Jin to undergo a brutal partial-birth abortion when she was 9 months pregnant.
Earlier in May, the Changli District Court had rejected Jin and Yang's complaint filed against the Changli Population and Family Planning Department. However the Qinhuangdao Intermediate Court overturned the verdict and agreed to rehear the case, since family planning officials had withheld evidence that showed Jin's abortion was involuntary.
According to the case, Jin and her husband were unable to obtain a timely "birth license" on account of marrying when Jin, then 20, was already more than 4 months pregnant. By the time Jin was eight months pregnant a family planning official, Di Weijun, had assured her husband Yang that he would be able to obtain the license on condition of paying a penalty.
Yang and his wife never received the license, but instead would pay a much harsher penalty than they had ever expected. On the evening of September 7, 2000, a detachment of Anshan county and Luojiaying village family planning officers arrived with no warning at the home of Jin and Yang with an order to carry out the abortion. The document was signed by none other than Di Weijun, the same man who had assured them that they could acquire the necessary license.
Yang was away, so the officers dragged Jin away to the Changli Family Planning Clinic were they aborted Jin's baby by lethal injection. Since Jin was unable to deliver her deceased and almost born child, doctors then dismembered the baby, probing Jin's womb with forceps, twisting and breaking the baby's head before removing the body.
Jin was later hospitalised for 44 days. In August 2001 Doctors at Tianjin Central Women's Hospital confirmed Jin would never be able to have children again due to the forced abortion. Beijing experts would later conclude the same.
Jin and Yang spent 7 years seeking justice until they met with Sun Maohang, a Beijing attorney who is representing the couple pro bono. Jin and Yang are seeking 290,000 yuan (38,300 USD) in compensation for medical expenses, 1 million yuan (132,000 USD) for psychological distress in addition to compensation for Jin's infertility.
"According to our understanding of the circumstances, I think this is the first instance of a planned pregnancy lawsuit admitted to the Chinese judicial system," Sun Maohang told Caijing Magazine.
He added, "No matter what the outcome, the ability of this kind of case to enter the judicial system, the acceptance into the legal realm, is already progress."
LifeSiteNews.com readers can obtain the full story as published in Caijing Magazine here:
http://www.caijing.com.cn/newcn/English/Rule/2007-07-25/25345.shtml
Back to TopLatest Headlines
- Cardinal Rigali: You Can't Claim to be "Reducing Abortions" but Publicly Funding them in D.C.
- General Electric to Use Embryonic Stem Cells for Testing, Phase out Lab Rats
- Ohio Supreme Court Allows Planned Parenthood to Conceal Abortion Records in Sexual Abuse Case
- LifeSiteNews Canada Day and Independence Day Message. Taking a few days off. LSN returns Monday July 6
- Heroically Pro-Life Brazilian Archbishop's Resignation Accepted Under Cloud of Vatican Newspaper Misrepresentation
- Pro-Life Groups Announce New Colorado Personhood Initiative
- Judge Puts Kibosh on DC Gay "Marriage" Referendum
- Al Franken Win Hands Supermajority to Senate Democrats
- Group Funded by Canadian Bishops' D&P Joins with Others to Denounce the "Natural Family" and "Family Rights"
- Financially Troubled Planned Parenthood of El Paso Closes Doors
- Abortion Linked to Subsequent Pre-Term Births, New Research Again Confirms
- New Orleans Homosexual Couple Ask Fed. Court to Overturn Marriage Amendment
- Slim Hope Of New Ontario Progressive Conservative Party Leader Promoting Pro-Life, Pro-Family Issues
- Pope Accepts Resignation of Bishop Caught Involved in Homosexual Encounters
- Young Children Removed from UK Schools for "Inappropriate Sexual Behaviour"
- Northern Ireland Politician Cleared of Wrongdoing after Reiterating Christian Teaching on Homosexual Acts
- UK Conservative Leader Speaks at Gay Pride Fundraiser
- More Letters to the Editor on Canadian Catholic Development and Peace Scandal (July 1)
- Letters to the Editor - Readers Respond to Development and Peace Scandal
- Watch This Dramatic New Video on Catholic Bishops Conference Funding of Pro-Abortion Groups
Most Read this Week
- Homosexual Duke U. Director Charged with Offering Adopted 5-Year-Old for Sex
- Famed Fr. Corapi Calls Canadian Bishops' Dissent from Humanae Vitae "Catastrophic"
- Pope: It is a Childish Faith to Oppose the Church Teaching on Life and Family
- Heroically Pro-Life Brazilian Archbishop's Resignation Accepted Under Cloud of Vatican Newspaper Misrepresentation
- LifeSiteNews Detailed Response to Canadian Bishops' Whitewash Report on Development and Peace
- General Electric to Use Embryonic Stem Cells for Testing, Phase Out Lab Rats
- Young Children Removed from UK Schools for "Inappropriate Sexual Behaviour"
- Is Pro-Choice the New Pro-Life?
- Swedish Parents Won't Tell if Child is Boy or Girl as Gender Experiment
- Cardinal Rigali: You Can't Claim to be "Reducing Abortions" but Publicly Funding them in D.C.
MORE NEWS: 
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page Last 10 Days Archives Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.