Thursday August 23, 2007
Trickery and Deception Pushed Abortion-Promoting Maputo Plan Through African Union
AU heads of state have never actually approved document; re-opening of discussion disallowed
By Samantha Singson
NEW YORK, August 23, 2007 (C-FAM.org) - In recent months abortion advocates have championed a document called the Maputo Plan of Action[2] as a regional victory in Africa in their work to achieve a universal right to abortion.
While proponents of the Maputo Plan of Action present the document as a consensus document of the African Union (AU) the truth is far different. High level government officials have told the Friday Fax that AU heads of state have never approved the document and that trickery and deception were used by the UN Population Fund (UNFPA) and others to push the document through various AU meetings.
Discussed at an AU special session of health ministers in September 2006, The "Maputo Plan of Action for the Operationalization of the Continental Policy Framework for Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights" is a non-binding three-year action plan that calls for AU member states to "enact policies and legal frameworks to reduce incidence of unsafe abortion" and to "prepare and implement national plans of action to reduce incidence of unwanted pregnancies and unsafe abortion".
According to sources familiar with the special session, several delegations objected to the abortion targets and indicators contained within the draft Plan of Action and only gave their approval to the draft on the understanding that the abortion provisions would be removed from the text. They were assured by the chairman of the meeting that those changes would be made in the final draft of the Plan of Action.
But the changes were never made. When delegates later realized that the abortion provision had not been removed, several said they felt "manipulated" by the AU secretariat.
The Maputo Plan of Action was then put on the agenda at the AU council meeting in January 2007 in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. While it was discussed by AU permanent representatives and foreign ministers, it was dropped off the agenda for the Heads of State meeting after Uganda's president said he would speak out against the abortion articles. The AU heads of state neither discussed nor approved the Maputo Plan of Action at the meeting.
The Ugandan delegation tried again to speak out against the Plan of Action's abortion provision at the regular AU health ministers meeting in Johannesburg, South Africa in April 2007. Sources at the meeting tell the Friday Fax that the Ugandan representative was shouted down by the chair and told that the Plan of Action was not on the agenda as it had already been approved by the AU heads of state, which was false. At least seven other AU members aligned themselves with Uganda's position.
While the Maputo Plan of Action is non-binding and its legitimacy as a consensus document remains highly controversial, experts warn that the targets and indicators on abortion will still be used to increase pressure on AU member states to amend their laws on abortion and used to measure "states progress" which is commonly done when international institutions assess a country's suitability for receiving financial assistance.
UNFPA has already announced that it will use the controversial document for its own programmatic purposes.
Latest Headlines
- "Manhattan Declaration" Embodies U.S. Christian Pushback against Abortion, Same-Sex "Marriage"

- Hoffman Loses Final Tally of NY-23 Race; Alleges ACORN Tampering and Fraud

- Abortion Activist Judge Hamilton Confirmed with Help of Ten Republican Senators

- CDC Reverses Gardasil Vaccine Requirement for Immigrants

- Germany Faces Economic Downturn with Plummeting Birth Rate and Aging Population

- CCHD in Archdiocese of Chicago Says it is Working to Fix Problems

- Rejection of Washington DC Marriage Referendum Challenged With Legal Suit

- Obama-Supporting Homosexual Activist to Out Sexually Involved Priests Unless they Support Gay 'Marriage

- Austrian Catholic Bishops Issue Bland Response to Govt's Homosexual Partnership Bill

- Interim Report on Catholic Sex-Abuse Says "Homosexual Identity" Not a Predictor of Sex Abuse

- Commentary on Nov 20 NewsBytes

- LSN NewsBytes - US Health Care Reform

- LSN NewsBytes - Catholic Campaign for Human Development (CCHD)

- LSN NewsBytes - Life Issues, Religion, Swine Flu, US Politics, Sarah Palin, Miscellaneous

- LSN NewsBytes - Climate Change/Global Warming

- 59 Bishops Contributed Financially to Maine Bishop's Effort to Oppose Maine Same-Sex "Marriage" Law

- Pro-Abortion Lawmakers Shower Praise on Senate Bill's Phony Abortion Compromise

Most Read this Week
- Largest U.S. Homosexual Publisher Shuts Down, Closing Major Gay Newspapers
- EWTN's Arroyo Hosts Reform CCHD Reps Who Reveal Shocking Evidence Against USCCB Anti-Poverty Arm
- Italian Mayors Order Crufixes Put in Classrooms in Revolt against European Court Ruling
- Nat'l Organization for Marriage Responds to Miss California "Sex Tape" Scandal
- Obama Evades Questioning on Stupak Amendment in FOX Interview
- "Manhattan Declaration" Embodies U.S. Christian Pushback against Abortion, Same-Sex "Marriage"
- French Judge Finds Hospital Guilty of "Unreasonable Obstinacy" in Saving Newborn's Life
- EU Leaders to Choose President today in Secret "Soviet Style" Meetings
- Hoffman "Unconcedes" Battle for NY-23: Recount Provides Hope for "Miracle" Victory
- CCHD Responds to Reform Movement
MORE NEWS:
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page
Last 10 Days
Archives
Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.








Back to Top