Wednesday December 19, 2007


Wisconsin Bishop Breaks from Conference and Opposes Emergency Contraception in Catholic Hospitals
Says, "Our conference's neutrality stance has also unintentionally provoked scandal among Catholics"
By John-Henry Westen
MADISON, WI, December 19, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Madison Bishop Robert C. Morlino has distanced himself from the Wisconsin Conference of Catholic Bishops neutral position regarding a bill which would mandate even Catholic hospitals to administer the morning after pill (so-called emergency contraception) upon request to women who have been raped. In a letter to the Wisconsin legislature, dated December 17, the Bishop tells the legislators, "I urge you, by this letter, to oppose AB 377," (the legislation in question).
A debate over such measures has been raging in the US with numerous states having enacted similar legislation and several bishops' conferences refusing to oppose the measures.
At issue is the abortifacient nature of the morning after pill, which some scientists have called into question even though several studies have shown abortion is a possible outcome of administering the drugs.
While the Vatican's Pontifical Academy for Life condemned any use of the morning after pill in a document issued in 2000 (see: http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_academies/acdli...) some Catholic ethicists remain unconvinced.
Bishops conferences which have permitted the morning after pill in Catholic hospitals for rape victims are basing their decisions on an interpretation of the US Conference of Catholic Bishops document: Ethical and Religious Directives (E.R.D.) for Catholic Health Care Services which states at no. 36 with regard to a woman who has been raped: "If after appropriate testing, there is no evidence that conception has occurred already, she may be treated with medications that would prevent ovulation, sperm capacitation the process by which spermatozoa in the ampullary portion of a uterine tube become capable of going through the acrosome reaction and fertilizing an oocyte." However, the document adds: "It is not permissible, however, to initiate or to recommend treatments that have as their purpose or direct effect the removal, destruction, or interference with the implantation of a fertilized ovum." (see the document: http://www.usccb.org/bishops/directives.shtml )
In his letter, Bishop Morlino explains that "The hoped-for effect of the Wisconsin Catholic Conference's earlier stance of neutrality on this bill was to protect women who are the victims of rape, while also protecting the possible pre-born human being, by affirming the necessary conscience exemption for institutions and individuals with regard to the appropriate testing, so as to avoid abortifacient emergency contraception."
He adds: "It is my judgment as Bishop of Madison that the earlier position of neutrality did not have its hoped for effect, and so it is now moot, and this neutrality position has now expired."
Since the debate among US Catholic theologians began in earnest early this year there was a related papal intervention which may have raised some eyebrows.
Speaking to pharmacists who took part in the 25th international congress of Catholic pharmacists this October, Pope Benedict XVI warned them against dispensing drugs "that have the goal of preventing the implantation of the embryo." The Pope's remarks bear directly on the morning after pill as its manufacturers state precisely that inhibiting implantation of the embryo is one of its possible effects.
Bishop Morlino stated in his letter that "Our conference's neutrality stance has also unintentionally provoked scandal among Catholics who have been persuaded by statements in the media that we are becoming less fervent in our defense of the dignity of pre-born human life."
SHARE THIS STORY:
E-mail
Print
Newsvine
Digg
Reddit
Del.icio.us
Facebook
Latest Headlines
- Pro-Life Leaders Say Call President Bush Today to Ensure Conscience Rights for Doctors

- Pro-Abortion MPs Attempting to Force Abortion on Northern Ireland through Back Door

- Obama Worse than Clintons on Abortion Says National Right to Life Leader: Interview

- Massive New Poll: 56% of Canadians Oppose Abortionist Morgentaler Order of Canada

- Atheist Professor Follows Through on Promise and Desecrates Eucharist

- Mexican State Legislators Seek to Define Personhood as Being from Conception

- World Premiere Documentary Spotlights Life-Saving 40 Days for Life Campaigns

- McDonald's Protesters Gather in California: "Stop Promoting Homosexuality"

- Lengthy Globe and Mail Article Explores Women's Experiences with Abortion

- Charges against California Home Schooling Family that Led to Homeschool Ban Likely to be Dropped

- Order of Canada Advisory Committee Member Also Strong Embryonic Stem-Cell Research Advocate

- Ruling Socialist Party Leader Wants to Begin Debate on Homosexual "Marriage" in Portugal

Most Read this Week
- Virgin Mobile Solicits Youth to Strip for Charity, Posts Videos on Website
- US Pediatric Nursing Journal Toys with Infanticide
- Knights of Columbus Calls on All 230,000 Members to Demand Morgentaler Award be Revoked
- San Jose Professor Fired for Answering Question about Genetics and Homosexuality
- London Times Runs Article Promoting Incest
- Catholic University of San Diego Changes Mind - Rejects Radical Non-Christian Feminist For Theology Chair
- Prominent Christian Theologian Dr. James Packer Speaks Out on Homosexuality
- Mexican Pro-Lifers to UN: Stop Murdering our Children
- Massive New POLL: 56% of Canadians Oppose Morgentaler Order of Canada
- Pope to World Youth Day: "The Womb - Has Become A Place of Unutterable Violence"
MORE NEWS:
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page
Last 10 Days
Archives
Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any Internet re-publishing of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews that have come from other news sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.


Back to Top