Thursday February 8, 2007
One-Third of Australian Doctors Would Euthanize Sick Babies, Survey Finds
By Gudrun Schultz
SYDNEY, Australia, February 8, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - One-in-three Australian doctors would euthanize newborn babies who were sick and suffering, according to a recent survey.
The survey was conducted by researchers at Sydney’s Westmead Children’s Hospital--results showed 32 percent of participating physicians would consider euthanizing a suffering newborn baby.
The report found a strong correlation between the doctors’ attitude towards their own death and their willingness to resort to euthanasia, with those who feared a slow and painful death more likely to end the lives of suffering patients, TheAge.com reported Feb.7.
Dr. Peter Barr, a neonatologist for the past 30 years, produced the survey in the form of an anonymous questionnaire that would carry no legal consequences for the participating physicians. Dr. Barr published a paper Feb.6 in the Archives of Disease in Childhood in which he found that doctors who suffer from a fear of death may subconsciously decide to euthanize an infant to “appease their own personal death anxiety.”
Those doctors who were afraid of cremation or of their bodies being donated to medical research, on the other hand, were less likely to cause the death of sick babies.
Most of the doctors surveyed said it would be more humane to euthanize patients with medication than to cause “undo suffering” by withdrawing food, water or oxygen.
Margaret Tighe, president of Right to Life Victoria, said the findings were of “grave concern.”
"Nobody has the right to kill another person on the basis of what they perceive to be their future quality of life," she said.
"These days sick children are not kept in pain. There have been tremendous advances made in caring for people with severe disabilities and I think that doctors have a duty to do the best they can."
Almost all of the 78 neonatologists questioned (94 percent) said they would give sufficient medication to control pain in terminal cases, even if the high dosage might inadvertently hasten death.
There are no ethical concerns associated with administering enough medication to control the suffering of those who are terminally ill, even if the drug levels are enough to hasten the death of the patient. Euthanasia is limited to cases where the action of the physician intentionally causes the death of patient, who would otherwise continue to live at that present moment.
Dr Rosanna Capolingua, chairwoman of the Australian Medical Association's ethics committee said, "We do not believe that doctors should be involved in any way with the intention of causing death or assisted suicide.
"But, indeed, doctors will be involved in the relief of pain and suffering in a terminally ill patient when it may be that providing that relief may hasten death," she said.
See related LifeSiteNews coverage:
Editorial: Why not Allow Euthanasia for Disabled Infants?- A Satire
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2006/nov/06111601.html
Australian Euthanasia Advocate Who Committed Suicide was Cancer-Free says Autopsy
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2004/jun/04060911.html
Euthanasia of Infants by Doctors Responsible for Nearly Half of Newborn Deaths in Belgium
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2005/apr/05041108.html
UK Docs: "Active Euthanasia" on Disabled Newborns Will Cut Abortion Rates
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2006/nov/06110601.html
Latest Headlines
- Cardinal Rigali: You Can't Claim to be "Reducing Abortions" but Publicly Funding them in D.C.

- General Electric to Use Embryonic Stem Cells for Testing, Phase out Lab Rats

- Ohio Supreme Court Allows Planned Parenthood to Conceal Abortion Records in Sexual Abuse Case

- LifeSiteNews Canada Day and Independence Day Message. Taking a few days off. LSN returns Monday July 6

- Heroically Pro-Life Brazilian Archbishop's Resignation Accepted Under Cloud of Vatican Newspaper Misrepresentation

- Pro-Life Groups Announce New Colorado Personhood Initiative

- Judge Puts Kibosh on DC Gay "Marriage" Referendum

- Al Franken Win Hands Supermajority to Senate Democrats

- Group Funded by Canadian Bishops' D&P Joins with Others to Denounce the "Natural Family" and "Family Rights"

- Financially Troubled Planned Parenthood of El Paso Closes Doors

- Abortion Linked to Subsequent Pre-Term Births, New Research Again Confirms

- New Orleans Homosexual Couple Ask Fed. Court to Overturn Marriage Amendment

- Slim Hope Of New Ontario Progressive Conservative Party Leader Promoting Pro-Life, Pro-Family Issues

- Pope Accepts Resignation of Bishop Caught Involved in Homosexual Encounters

- Young Children Removed from UK Schools for "Inappropriate Sexual Behaviour"

- Northern Ireland Politician Cleared of Wrongdoing after Reiterating Christian Teaching on Homosexual Acts

- UK Conservative Leader Speaks at Gay Pride Fundraiser

- More Letters to the Editor on Canadian Catholic Development and Peace Scandal (July 1)

- Letters to the Editor - Readers Respond to Development and Peace Scandal

- Watch This Dramatic New Video on Catholic Bishops Conference Funding of Pro-Abortion Groups

Most Read this Week
- Homosexual Duke U. Director Charged with Offering Adopted 5-Year-Old for Sex
- Famed Fr. Corapi Calls Canadian Bishops' Dissent from Humanae Vitae "Catastrophic"
- Pope: It is a Childish Faith to Oppose the Church Teaching on Life and Family
- Heroically Pro-Life Brazilian Archbishop's Resignation Accepted Under Cloud of Vatican Newspaper Misrepresentation
- LifeSiteNews Detailed Response to Canadian Bishops' Whitewash Report on Development and Peace
- General Electric to Use Embryonic Stem Cells for Testing, Phase Out Lab Rats
- Young Children Removed from UK Schools for "Inappropriate Sexual Behaviour"
- Is Pro-Choice the New Pro-Life?
- Swedish Parents Won't Tell if Child is Boy or Girl as Gender Experiment
- Cardinal Rigali: You Can't Claim to be "Reducing Abortions" but Publicly Funding them in D.C.
MORE NEWS:
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page
Last 10 Days
Archives
Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.







Back to Top