Thursday February 8, 2007
One-Third of Australian Doctors Would Euthanize Sick Babies, Survey Finds
By Gudrun Schultz
SYDNEY, Australia, February 8, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - One-in-three Australian doctors would euthanize newborn babies who were sick and suffering, according to a recent survey.
The survey was conducted by researchers at Sydney’s Westmead Children’s Hospital--results showed 32 percent of participating physicians would consider euthanizing a suffering newborn baby.
The report found a strong correlation between the doctors’ attitude towards their own death and their willingness to resort to euthanasia, with those who feared a slow and painful death more likely to end the lives of suffering patients, TheAge.com reported Feb.7.
Dr. Peter Barr, a neonatologist for the past 30 years, produced the survey in the form of an anonymous questionnaire that would carry no legal consequences for the participating physicians. Dr. Barr published a paper Feb.6 in the Archives of Disease in Childhood in which he found that doctors who suffer from a fear of death may subconsciously decide to euthanize an infant to “appease their own personal death anxiety.”
Those doctors who were afraid of cremation or of their bodies being donated to medical research, on the other hand, were less likely to cause the death of sick babies.
Most of the doctors surveyed said it would be more humane to euthanize patients with medication than to cause “undo suffering” by withdrawing food, water or oxygen.
Margaret Tighe, president of Right to Life Victoria, said the findings were of “grave concern.”
"Nobody has the right to kill another person on the basis of what they perceive to be their future quality of life," she said.
"These days sick children are not kept in pain. There have been tremendous advances made in caring for people with severe disabilities and I think that doctors have a duty to do the best they can."
Almost all of the 78 neonatologists questioned (94 percent) said they would give sufficient medication to control pain in terminal cases, even if the high dosage might inadvertently hasten death.
There are no ethical concerns associated with administering enough medication to control the suffering of those who are terminally ill, even if the drug levels are enough to hasten the death of the patient. Euthanasia is limited to cases where the action of the physician intentionally causes the death of patient, who would otherwise continue to live at that present moment.
Dr Rosanna Capolingua, chairwoman of the Australian Medical Association's ethics committee said, "We do not believe that doctors should be involved in any way with the intention of causing death or assisted suicide.
"But, indeed, doctors will be involved in the relief of pain and suffering in a terminally ill patient when it may be that providing that relief may hasten death," she said.
See related LifeSiteNews coverage:
Editorial: Why not Allow Euthanasia for Disabled Infants?- A Satire
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2006/nov/06111601.html
Australian Euthanasia Advocate Who Committed Suicide was Cancer-Free says Autopsy
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2004/jun/04060911.html
Euthanasia of Infants by Doctors Responsible for Nearly Half of Newborn Deaths in Belgium
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2005/apr/05041108.html
UK Docs: "Active Euthanasia" on Disabled Newborns Will Cut Abortion Rates
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2006/nov/06110601.html
Latest Headlines
- BREAKING: US Congress Passes Health Care Reform Bill 220 - 215

- Stupak Amendment to Health Care Bill Passes 240 - 194 Saturday Evening

- Major Health Care Development - Pro-Life Stupak Amendment Vote OK'd for Today

- NY Times: Dems Banking on Later Squeezing Pro-Life Language Out of Bill in Committee

- USCCB Spokesman: "Definitely Not True" that Bishops Support Bill As it Stands

- TIME Got it Wrong - Prof. George Opposed Grandiose Kennedy Funeral

- USCCB Condemnation Tears Facade off "Phony" Abortion Compromise for Health Bill

- Health Care Bill Includes Monthly Abortion Premium: House Minority Leader Boehner

- TIME Article Setting Burke Against O'Malley Called "Tactical strike" on Behalf of Catholic Left

- Dirty Fighting on Abortion Funding: Word-Games and Health-Care Theatrics Boggle the Mind

- Commentary on November 6 News

- Note to LifeSiteNews Subscribers with Rogers email addresses

- New York Gov. Declares Nov. 10 Extraordinary Legislative Session for Same-Sex "Marriage"

- Washington's Pro-Family Amendment Effort Defeated - R-71 Almost Certain to Pass

- Vote Pushed Back on Canadian Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide Bill to Dec. 2

- Elderly U.K. Couple in Good Health Commit Suicide, Complain of Assisted Suicide Law

- Texas Late-Term Abortionist and Baptist Minister Admits: "Am I killing? Yes, I am"

- New Evidence Contradicts CCHD's Findings on Accused Pro-Abortion Partner

- Quebec Priest Denies Possibility of Sexual Reorientation Therapy on TV

- New Hampshire Same-Sex "Marriage" Law in Crosshairs after Maine's Law Crumbles

- Brooklyn Bishop Criticized for Recorded Message Praising Pro-Abortion Politician

- First Group of "Traditionalist" Anglicans in Britain Votes to Enter Catholic Church

Most Read this Week
- Planned Parenthood Director Resigns after Watching Ultrasound of Abortion Procedure
- Nun Defiant Following Rebuke, but Stops Abortion Escorting
- Breaking: Dominican Community Apologizes for Nun Caught Acting as Abortion Escort
- TIME Article Setting Burke Against O'Malley Called "Tactical strike" on Behalf of Catholics Left
- Over 200 Christendom College Students Protest Abortion at Planned Parenthood Clinic
- Newly Identified Corporate Supporters of Planned Parenthood Named
- Scottish Gay Rights Activists Found Guilty of Pedophilia Sentenced to Life Imprisonment
- US Congress Passes Health Care Reform Bill 218 to 215
- Major Health Care Bill Development - Stupak Hyde Amendment Vote OK'd
- Health Care Bill Includes Monthly Abortion Premium: House Minority Leader Boehner
MORE NEWS:
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page
Last 10 Days
Archives
Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.








Back to Top