Thursday January 4, 2007
Malta Threatens to Block EU Divorce Changes Unless Legal Opt-out Clause is Included
By Gudrun Schultz
VALETTA, Malta, January 4, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Malta has warned the European Union it will not support a proposal to change divorce procedures unless legal protection is in place to protect the island nation from the changes, the Times of Malta reported earlier today.
"Although the Commission is saying that Malta's stand vis-à-vis divorce won't be affected by this proposal, we are still demanding a legal assurance,” a government source told The Times yesterday. “We have already clearly stated that we won't be able to support the proposal if Malta is not given an opt-out from the new legislation. We are after 'legal certainty'."
Introduced by European Justice Commissioner Franco Frattini last summer, the proposal would ease international divorce proceedings in the EU, providing greater legal clarity and flexibility with harmonized rules on divorce law throughout member states
The Maltese government has said it is not satisfied with assurances from Commissioner officials that the proposal would not affect Malta’s laws and wants a special clause in place clearly stating that the new legislation will not apply to Malta.
"We will not be resting on just a simple interpretation by the Commission that the law does not apply to Malta,” government sources said. “This can easily be challenged in the future and the European court can change such interpretation. That is why we want a definite opt-out clause. This is the only way that can give us legal certainty.”
Malta is the only EU member who does not permit divorce. Commission officials told The Times last summer that the proposed changes would not affect Malta, stating that no Maltese court would have jurisdiction to alter divorce procedures, regardless of the EU legislation.
The treaty must be ratified by all member states in order to take effect. Malta’s refusal to support the proposal would block its passage.
The Maltese government has steadfastly resisted pressure from the EU and the United Nations to introduce liberal laws on issues such as abortion, homosexual ‘marriage’ and divorce. In 2004 the Maltese Prime Minister and the Bishop’s Conference roundly rejected a UN directive calling on Malta to legalize abortion.
The Bishops o f Malta have been an active voice in resisting efforts to introduce homosexual “marriage’ to the country. In a letter calling for the protection of traditional marriage, issued in November 2005, the bishops urged the nation to resist pressure by the extremely small but internationally connected Malta Gay Rights Movement to permit homosexual unions.
The government’s defense of traditional morality is largely supported by the Maltese population of the strongly Catholic nation. More than 80 percent of Maltese citizens would support a constitutional amendment to protect the right to life of unborn children, a survey released last month showed.
See related LifeSiteNews coverage:
Vast Gap in Malta between Reality And Media Picture of Abortion, Divorce, Gay Rights Forces
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2005/jun/05060207.html
Malta Pro-Life Urges Constitutional Protection for Unborn
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2006/nov/06110702.html
Malta Stands Fast against UN Feminist Offensive
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2004/jul/04072202.html
Maltese Prime Minister and Bishop's Conference Reject United Nations Abortion Push
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2004/dec/04120101.html
No Ideology can Eradicate True Meaning of Marriage say Maltese Bishops
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2005/nov/05112507.html
Latest Headlines
- Cardinal Rigali: You Can't Claim to be "Reducing Abortions" but Publicly Funding them in D.C.

- General Electric to Use Embryonic Stem Cells for Testing, Phase out Lab Rats

- Ohio Supreme Court Allows Planned Parenthood to Conceal Abortion Records in Sexual Abuse Case

- LifeSiteNews Canada Day and Independence Day Message. Taking a few days off. LSN returns Monday July 6

- Heroically Pro-Life Brazilian Archbishop's Resignation Accepted Under Cloud of Vatican Newspaper Misrepresentation

- Pro-Life Groups Announce New Colorado Personhood Initiative

- Judge Puts Kibosh on DC Gay "Marriage" Referendum

- Al Franken Win Hands Supermajority to Senate Democrats

- Group Funded by Canadian Bishops' D&P Joins with Others to Denounce the "Natural Family" and "Family Rights"

- Financially Troubled Planned Parenthood of El Paso Closes Doors

- Abortion Linked to Subsequent Pre-Term Births, New Research Again Confirms

- New Orleans Homosexual Couple Ask Fed. Court to Overturn Marriage Amendment

- Slim Hope Of New Ontario Progressive Conservative Party Leader Promoting Pro-Life, Pro-Family Issues

- Pope Accepts Resignation of Bishop Caught Involved in Homosexual Encounters

- Young Children Removed from UK Schools for "Inappropriate Sexual Behaviour"

- Northern Ireland Politician Cleared of Wrongdoing after Reiterating Christian Teaching on Homosexual Acts

- UK Conservative Leader Speaks at Gay Pride Fundraiser

- More Letters to the Editor on Canadian Catholic Development and Peace Scandal (July 1)

- Letters to the Editor - Readers Respond to Development and Peace Scandal

- Watch This Dramatic New Video on Catholic Bishops Conference Funding of Pro-Abortion Groups

Most Read this Week
- Homosexual Duke U. Director Charged with Offering Adopted 5-Year-Old for Sex
- Famed Fr. Corapi Calls Canadian Bishops' Dissent from Humanae Vitae "Catastrophic"
- Pope: It is a Childish Faith to Oppose the Church Teaching on Life and Family
- LifeSiteNews Detailed Response to Canadian Bishops' Whitewash Report on Development and Peace
- Heroically Pro-Life Brazilian Archbishop's Resignation Accepted Under Cloud of Vatican Newspaper Misrepresentation
- Young Children Removed from UK Schools for "Inappropriate Sexual Behaviour"
- General Electric to Use Embryonic Stem Cells for Testing, Phase Out Lab Rats
- Is Pro-Choice the New Pro-Life?
- Swedish Parents Won't Tell if Child is Boy or Girl as Gender Experiment
- Cardinal Rigali: You Can't Claim to be "Reducing Abortions" but Publicly Funding them in D.C.
MORE NEWS:
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page
Last 10 Days
Archives
Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.







Back to Top