Wednesday January 10, 2007
Carleton University Pro-Life Group Granted Club Status By CUSA
By Gudrun Schultz
OTTAWA, Canada, January 10, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The Carleton University Student’s Association voted yesterday to grant the campus pro-life group Carleton LifeLine club status, in a confusing twist in the ongoing battle over the organization’s new policy banning groups that support anti-abortion legislation from campus.
Despite the controversial policy statement that “actions such as campaigns, distributions, solicitations, lobbying efforts, displays, events, etc. that seek to limit or remove a woman's options in the event of pregnancy will not be supported," CUSA members voted almost unanimously to approve LifeLine as an official club, with only one vote opposed. Thirty-six-year old Ken Woolliscroft, president of the Women’s Studies Society, opposed the motion to approve the group, the Ottawa Citizen reported this morning.
Nicholas McLeod, spokesperson for LifeLine, told the Citizen the group has no idea if their planned activities will be considered unacceptable by CUSA, now that they have club status--the group plans to raise their profile on campus and begin a campaign to recruit new members and hand out pamphlets.
"I don't know which one of these things violates this new policy because they all do if you take the policy extremely literally," said Mr. McLeod. "So I don't know where the students' association is going to draw the line."
Shelley Melanson, vice-president of finance for CUSA, said it was a “misconception” that the controversial policy was adopted because of LifeLine.
"It's always been about actions and not supporting certain actions," she said, adding that the issue was about freedom of speech. "If you look at the policy ... what it states is that it will not support actions that are anti-abortion. It's fine to have your own opinion about when life begins. We are a university, and debate is allowed."
The initial move to ban groups opposed to abortion from campus was triggered, however, by a campus debate on abortion organized by LifeLine that was held early in November and attended by more than 200 students and other participants. The Wymen’s Centre on campus claimed to have received complaints from female students following the debate.
Interest in the group appears to be growing on campus, with one report showing 15 students signed up for membership following the November debate.
While Melanson said LifeLine’s activities will be monitored, as all other clubs are monitored, she said debates including pro-choice and pro-life groups would not violate the CUSA policy.
The Evangelical Fellowship of Canada was reportedly considering legal action against CUSA for the ban on pro-life groups. It’s not known if that possibility was a factor in the decision to grant LifeLine club status.
Official recognition as a campus group gives LifeLine access to $2000 in annual funding, among other benefits.
See previous LifeSiteNews coverage:
Carleton Students’ Association May Face Lawsuit Over Ban on Pro-Life Groups
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2006/dec/06120809.html
Second Canadian University Student Union Bans Official Recognition of Pro-Life Clubs
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2006/dec/06120604.html
Canadian University Set to Prohibit Club Status For Any Group Opposed to Abortion
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2006/nov/06112406.html
Latest Headlines
- "Manhattan Declaration" Embodies U.S. Christian Pushback against Abortion, Same-Sex "Marriage"

- Hoffman Loses Final Tally of NY-23 Race; Alleges ACORN Tampering and Fraud

- Abortion Activist Judge Hamilton Confirmed with Help of Ten Republican Senators

- CDC Reverses Gardasil Vaccine Requirement for Immigrants

- Germany Faces Economic Downturn with Plummeting Birth Rate and Aging Population

- CCHD in Archdiocese of Chicago Says it is Working to Fix Problems

- Rejection of Washington DC Marriage Referendum Challenged With Legal Suit

- Obama-Supporting Homosexual Activist to Out Sexually Involved Priests Unless they Support Gay 'Marriage

- Austrian Catholic Bishops Issue Bland Response to Govt's Homosexual Partnership Bill

- Interim Report on Catholic Sex-Abuse Says "Homosexual Identity" Not a Predictor of Sex Abuse

- Commentary on Nov 20 NewsBytes

- LSN NewsBytes - US Health Care Reform

- LSN NewsBytes - Catholic Campaign for Human Development (CCHD)

- LSN NewsBytes - Life Issues, Religion, Swine Flu, US Politics, Sarah Palin, Miscellaneous

- LSN NewsBytes - Climate Change/Global Warming

- 59 Bishops Contributed Financially to Maine Bishop's Effort to Oppose Maine Same-Sex "Marriage" Law

- Pro-Abortion Lawmakers Shower Praise on Senate Bill's Phony Abortion Compromise

Most Read this Week
- Largest U.S. Homosexual Publisher Shuts Down, Closing Major Gay Newspapers
- EWTN's Arroyo Hosts Reform CCHD Reps Who Reveal Shocking Evidence Against USCCB Anti-Poverty Arm
- Italian Mayors Order Crufixes Put in Classrooms in Revolt against European Court Ruling
- Nat'l Organization for Marriage Responds to Miss California "Sex Tape" Scandal
- Obama Evades Questioning on Stupak Amendment in FOX Interview
- French Judge Finds Hospital Guilty of "Unreasonable Obstinacy" in Saving Newborn's Life
- EU Leaders to Choose President today in Secret "Soviet Style" Meetings
- Hoffman "Unconcedes" Battle for NY-23: Recount Provides Hope for "Miracle" Victory
- "Manhattan Declaration" Embodies U.S. Christian Pushback against Abortion, Same-Sex "Marriage"
- CCHD Responds to Reform Movement
MORE NEWS:
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page
Last 10 Days
Archives
Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.








Back to Top