Friday November 2, 2007


Christian Couple no Longer Required to Promote Homosexuality in Fostering Children
Couple thanks media for making their situation known to public
By Hilary White
CHARD, Somerset UK, November 2, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Vincent and Pauline Matherick are the Christian couple in Somerset who chose to retire from fostering needy children rather than bow to the Somerset county council’s demand that they promote the homosexual lifestyle. After the media generated international uproar over their situation, they have been invited back by the council and have had their religious objections recognised.
The couple met with council officials on Wednesday and today were told they could continue fostering and would not have to “promote homosexuality”. “It's good news and we're very pleased,” Mr Matherick said.
“This is a blessing and I must thank the media, and particularly the Daily Mail, for their help in highlighting the issue.”
Somerset council officials said in a statement that the couple “have no problem in signing Somerset's Equalities Promise, which includes an expectation not to discriminate unfairly for reasons of sex, marital status, caring responsibilities or sexual orientation.”
“We all agree that the welfare of children is paramount. It is absolutely vital that people come forward as foster carers.”
The council’s statement admitted that the incident “may have damaged the image of fostering at a time when vulnerable children need caring homes.”
A spokesman for the couple said the council had agreed to recognise their convictions and conscientious objections. “The Mathericks hope now to continue to foster children as before.”
Andrea Williams of Christian Concern For Our Nation said: “This is a significant step forward for Christian freedoms in that the Council has agreed not to force Mr. and Mrs. Matherick to act against their Christian beliefs. This should be of enormous encouragement to all Christians who want to take up the important role of caring for vulnerable children.”
The Mathericks are ministers in the non-conformist South Chard Christian Church and when their 11 year-old foster son David was removed from their home, he had asked to be allowed to continue attending their Sunday school.
The Mathericks had insisted that they had never “discriminated” against anyone for any reason, but that they could not agree to the council’s “equality statement” because it amounted to promotion of homosexuality, which would be a violation of their Christian beliefs and conscience. Mr Matherick said, “I cannot preach the benefits of homosexuality when I believe it is against the word of God.”
As a result of their decision, the council removed their 11 year-old foster son David and placed him in a council-owned facility. The Mathericks had cared for 28 children in their home since 2001 and were described as ideal foster carers.
The “equality” agreement had required them to tell their foster children that homosexuality was the equivalent to natural sexuality and to discuss “gay dating” practices with them. They had been told that they would be required to take children to homosexual support groups if the child “expressed an interest” in homosexuality.
The Somerset council refused to discuss the matter until the case became public in the national papers and internationally on LifeSiteNews.com.
Read related LifeSiteNews.com coverage:
UK Christian Couple who Refuse to Promote Homosexuality Forced out of Child Foster Care
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/oct/07102906.html
UK Christians Retired from Fostering Over a “Misunderstanding” Says Council
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/oct/07102502.html
SHARE THIS STORY:
E-mail
Print
Newsvine
Digg
Reddit
Del.icio.us
Facebook
Latest Headlines
- Democratic Platform Promises, Republican Platform Rejects More Abortion Overseas

- US Government Cuts Off Supplies to Marie Stopes International

- Catholic Magazine Calls For Defeat And Removal Of Prime Minister Harper

- Liberal Party says it Too Opposes Reopening the Abortion Debate

- Cardinal Rigali Urges Opposition to "Freedom of Choice Act" during Respect Life Month

- Kansas City Bishop Warns: Federal "Freedom of Choice Act" would Make "Null and Void" all Abortion Restrictions in the US

- LifeChain to be Held this Sunday October 5 in 1375 Cities in US, Canada

- Judicial Council Dismisses Complaint against Chief Justice over Morgentaler Award

- Day 9 Of 40 Days For Life Ottawa

- Fordham Students Petition University President to Revoke Award Offer to Justice Breyer

- Forty Years of Culture wars in Canada

- After Receiving 18,201 Petitions, YouTube Pulls Host Desecration Videos

- Swedish Man Awarded $24,170 Compensation after Filming Himself Having Sex with 14 Year-Old

Most Read this Week
- Extreme Pro-Abortion Feminist Heather Mallick Scheduled to Speak at Catholic St. Mary's University
- Sarah Palin Speaks on Abortion, Contraception, Homosexuality
- Martin Sheen Stars in Ad Opposing Assisted Suicide in Washington State
- Abortion Patient of George Tiller Feared for Life: 'They're Liable to Kill Me'
- Bella Star Eduardo Saves Five Unborn Babies' Lives
- Prime Minister Harper: Not Now, Not Ever Will Conservative Government Protect Unborn Children
- CBC Apologises for "Porn Star" Attack on Palin
- Russia: 64% of Pregnancies End in Abortion
- Bishop Soto Crashes National Homosexual Ministries Conference with the Truth: Homosexuality "is Sinful"
- Catholic Magazine Calls For Defeat And Removal Of Prime Minister Harper
MORE NEWS:
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page
Last 10 Days
Archives
Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.


Back to Top