Wednesday October 17, 2007
Uruguayan Senate Ties on Pro-Abortion Legislation
Bill's proponents begin new strategy for passage
By Matthew Cullinan Hoffman
MONTEVIDEO, October 17, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - An attempt to legalize abortion in Uruguay for practically any reason during the first three months of pregnancy failed today when the vote ended in a 15-15 tie.
Although the vote was initially expected to pass, two members of the ruling Broad Front coalition, a group of socialist parties, defected to the pro-life position last week. Their position is matched by Uruguayan President Tabare Vazquez, also of the Broad Front, who is an obstetrician and is firmly opposed to abortion. He has reiterated his promise to veto any legislation legalizing the practice.
The failed legislation would have allowed abortions during the first trimester of pregnancy for reasons ranging from fetal deformities to a definition of "health" that included social concerns, psychological well being, and even financial difficulties. It also would have imposed a pro-homosexual and pro-abortion "sexual education" curriculum down to the elementary school level. The provisions of the bill provoked a protest march on Monday, which was attended by the Archbishop of Montevideo (see previous coverage at http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2007/oct/07101608.html).
The vote, which was expected to take place last night, was delayed until today when the Senate chamber was evacuated in response to a bomb threat. After a search failed to turn up any explosive devices, debate was scheduled to resume the following morning. The motive of the threat is still unknown.
Disappointed Broad Front members who support the legislation told one reporter that they would follow new strategies to achieve approval for the legislation, including approving the legislation without the abortion provisions, then sending it back to the lower house (the Chamber of Deputies), where the abortion provisions would be re-added. They then hope to ratify the newly-approved legislation in a number of ways, including a General Assembly of the legislature (which requires only a simple majority), or failing that, a national referendum. Passing the bill over the veto of President Vazquez would require a three-fifths majority and is seen as impossible.
The strong opposition to the legislation in the Uruguayan legislature and executive branches is somewhat surprising in what is probably the most liberal nation in Latin America. Less than 18% of the 66% Catholic population attends mass on Sundays, and 31% of the population professes no religion at all. The country has liberal divorce laws, and a much-touted opinion poll last year claimed to show that a majority of Uruguayans favor the legalization of abortion.
However, the moral stigma attached to the practice in Latin culture, even within more liberal countries such as Uruguay, has made passage of pro-abortion legislation all but impossible up to the present date. At least two previous attempts have been made in this decade in Uruguay, in 2002 and 2004, and also failed.
See Recent LifeSiteNews.com Coverage:
Uruguayans March Against Legalization of Abortion
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2007/oct/07101608.html
Uruguay Will Vote on Legalizing Abortion Tuesday
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2007/oct/07101506.html
Latest Headlines
- BREAKING: US Congress Passes Health Care Reform Bill 220 to 215

- Stupak Amendment to Health Care Bill Passes 240 - 194 Saturday Evening

- Major Health Care Development - Pro-Life Stupak Amendment Vote OK'd for Today

- NY Times: Dems Banking on Later Squeezing Pro-Life Language Out of Bill in Committee

- USCCB Spokesman: "Definitely Not True" that Bishops Support Bill As it Stands

- TIME Got it Wrong - Prof. George Opposed Grandiose Kennedy Funeral

- USCCB Condemnation Tears Facade off "Phony" Abortion Compromise for Health Bill

- Health Care Bill Includes Monthly Abortion Premium: House Minority Leader Boehner

- TIME Article Setting Burke Against O'Malley Called "Tactical strike" on Behalf of Catholic Left

- Dirty Fighting on Abortion Funding: Word-Games and Health-Care Theatrics Boggle the Mind

- Commentary on November 6 News

- Note to LifeSiteNews Subscribers with Rogers email addresses

- New York Gov. Declares Nov. 10 Extraordinary Legislative Session for Same-Sex "Marriage"

- Washington's Pro-Family Amendment Effort Defeated - R-71 Almost Certain to Pass

- Vote Pushed Back on Canadian Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide Bill to Dec. 2

- Elderly U.K. Couple in Good Health Commit Suicide, Complain of Assisted Suicide Law

- Texas Late-Term Abortionist and Baptist Minister Admits: "Am I killing? Yes, I am"

- New Evidence Contradicts CCHD's Findings on Accused Pro-Abortion Partner

- Quebec Priest Denies Possibility of Sexual Reorientation Therapy on TV

- New Hampshire Same-Sex "Marriage" Law in Crosshairs after Maine's Law Crumbles

- Brooklyn Bishop Criticized for Recorded Message Praising Pro-Abortion Politician

- First Group of "Traditionalist" Anglicans in Britain Votes to Enter Catholic Church

Most Read this Week
- Planned Parenthood Director Resigns after Watching Ultrasound of Abortion Procedure
- Nun Defiant Following Rebuke, but Stops Abortion Escorting
- Breaking: Dominican Community Apologizes for Nun Caught Acting as Abortion Escort
- Over 200 Christendom College Students Protest Abortion at Planned Parenthood Clinic
- TIME Article Setting Burke Against O'Malley Called "Tactical strike" on Behalf of Catholics Left
- Scottish Gay Rights Activists Found Guilty of Pedophilia Sentenced to Life Imprisonment
- Newly Identified Corporate Supporters of Planned Parenthood Named
- Health Care Bill Includes Monthly Abortion Premium: House Minority Leader Boehner
- Major Health Care Bill Development - Stupak Hyde Amendment Vote OK'd
- Canadian MP Launches Petition to Stop Federal Funding of Planned Parenthood
MORE NEWS:
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page
Last 10 Days
Archives
Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.








Back to Top