Wednesday October 17, 2007
Uruguayan Senate Ties on Pro-Abortion Legislation
Bill's proponents begin new strategy for passage
By Matthew Cullinan Hoffman
MONTEVIDEO, October 17, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - An attempt to legalize abortion in Uruguay for practically any reason during the first three months of pregnancy failed today when the vote ended in a 15-15 tie.
Although the vote was initially expected to pass, two members of the ruling Broad Front coalition, a group of socialist parties, defected to the pro-life position last week. Their position is matched by Uruguayan President Tabare Vazquez, also of the Broad Front, who is an obstetrician and is firmly opposed to abortion. He has reiterated his promise to veto any legislation legalizing the practice.
The failed legislation would have allowed abortions during the first trimester of pregnancy for reasons ranging from fetal deformities to a definition of "health" that included social concerns, psychological well being, and even financial difficulties. It also would have imposed a pro-homosexual and pro-abortion "sexual education" curriculum down to the elementary school level. The provisions of the bill provoked a protest march on Monday, which was attended by the Archbishop of Montevideo (see previous coverage at http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2007/oct/07101608.html).
The vote, which was expected to take place last night, was delayed until today when the Senate chamber was evacuated in response to a bomb threat. After a search failed to turn up any explosive devices, debate was scheduled to resume the following morning. The motive of the threat is still unknown.
Disappointed Broad Front members who support the legislation told one reporter that they would follow new strategies to achieve approval for the legislation, including approving the legislation without the abortion provisions, then sending it back to the lower house (the Chamber of Deputies), where the abortion provisions would be re-added. They then hope to ratify the newly-approved legislation in a number of ways, including a General Assembly of the legislature (which requires only a simple majority), or failing that, a national referendum. Passing the bill over the veto of President Vazquez would require a three-fifths majority and is seen as impossible.
The strong opposition to the legislation in the Uruguayan legislature and executive branches is somewhat surprising in what is probably the most liberal nation in Latin America. Less than 18% of the 66% Catholic population attends mass on Sundays, and 31% of the population professes no religion at all. The country has liberal divorce laws, and a much-touted opinion poll last year claimed to show that a majority of Uruguayans favor the legalization of abortion.
However, the moral stigma attached to the practice in Latin culture, even within more liberal countries such as Uruguay, has made passage of pro-abortion legislation all but impossible up to the present date. At least two previous attempts have been made in this decade in Uruguay, in 2002 and 2004, and also failed.
See Recent LifeSiteNews.com Coverage:
Uruguayans March Against Legalization of Abortion
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2007/oct/07101608.html
Uruguay Will Vote on Legalizing Abortion Tuesday
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2007/oct/07101506.html
Latest Headlines
- Cardinal Rigali: You Can't Claim to be "Reducing Abortions" but Publicly Funding them in D.C.

- General Electric to Use Embryonic Stem Cells for Testing, Phase out Lab Rats

- Ohio Supreme Court Allows Planned Parenthood to Conceal Abortion Records in Sexual Abuse Case

- LifeSiteNews Canada Day and Independence Day Message. Taking a few days off. LSN returns Monday July 6

- Heroically Pro-Life Brazilian Archbishop's Resignation Accepted Under Cloud of Vatican Newspaper Misrepresentation

- Pro-Life Groups Announce New Colorado Personhood Initiative

- Judge Puts Kibosh on DC Gay "Marriage" Referendum

- Al Franken Win Hands Supermajority to Senate Democrats

- Group Funded by Canadian Bishops' D&P Joins with Others to Denounce the "Natural Family" and "Family Rights"

- Financially Troubled Planned Parenthood of El Paso Closes Doors

- Abortion Linked to Subsequent Pre-Term Births, New Research Again Confirms

- New Orleans Homosexual Couple Ask Fed. Court to Overturn Marriage Amendment

- Slim Hope Of New Ontario Progressive Conservative Party Leader Promoting Pro-Life, Pro-Family Issues

- Pope Accepts Resignation of Bishop Caught Involved in Homosexual Encounters

- Young Children Removed from UK Schools for "Inappropriate Sexual Behaviour"

- Northern Ireland Politician Cleared of Wrongdoing after Reiterating Christian Teaching on Homosexual Acts

- UK Conservative Leader Speaks at Gay Pride Fundraiser

- More Letters to the Editor on Canadian Catholic Development and Peace Scandal (July 1)

- Letters to the Editor - Readers Respond to Development and Peace Scandal

- Watch This Dramatic New Video on Catholic Bishops Conference Funding of Pro-Abortion Groups

Most Read this Week
- Homosexual Duke U. Director Charged with Offering Adopted 5-Year-Old for Sex
- Famed Fr. Corapi Calls Canadian Bishops' Dissent from Humanae Vitae "Catastrophic"
- Pope: It is a Childish Faith to Oppose the Church Teaching on Life and Family
- LifeSiteNews Detailed Response to Canadian Bishops' Whitewash Report on Development and Peace
- Heroically Pro-Life Brazilian Archbishop's Resignation Accepted Under Cloud of Vatican Newspaper Misrepresentation
- Young Children Removed from UK Schools for "Inappropriate Sexual Behaviour"
- Is Pro-Choice the New Pro-Life?
- General Electric to Use Embryonic Stem Cells for Testing, Phase Out Lab Rats
- Swedish Parents Won't Tell if Child is Boy or Girl as Gender Experiment
- Cardinal Rigali: You Can't Claim to be "Reducing Abortions" but Publicly Funding them in D.C.
MORE NEWS:
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page
Last 10 Days
Archives
Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.







Back to Top