Politics
Thursday September 27, 2007
UN Population Fund Still Denies but in Fact Very Much Does Fund Abortion Advocacy
Of UNFPA’s three focus areas, two stress reproductive rights
TODAY'S HEADLINES
E-MAIL
PRINT
By Samantha Singson
NEW YORK, September 27, 2007 (C-FAM.org) - The UN Population Fund (UNFPA) and its supporters around the world repeatedly deny that UNFPA supports abortion in any way shape or form. UNFPA critics believe this is hard to square with UNFPA programs and program partners.
The latest evidence of UNFPA's involvement in the promotion of abortion comes in the annual report of the Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR), a non-profit pro-abortion law firm located in New York which is active in trying to change abortion laws around the world. According to the Center's most recent annual report, UNFPA was one of their largest financial contributors last year, donating as much as $50,000.
CRR has been one of the most active and effective abortion lobbying organizations internationally. In 2006 alone, the CRR was involved in 22 cases in the US and abroad on the abortion issue, including the overturning of Colombia’s ban on abortion in 2006. According to their annual report, CRR has been involved in cases that include abortion bans, access to abortion, restrictions on minors, mandatory delays before procuring abortions, as well as cases involving regulation of abortion providers.
Apart from its contribution to CRR last year, UNFPA gave the International Planned Parenthood Federation over $160,000 in 2005. International Planned Parenthood Federation is one of the largest and richest abortion providers and advocacy groups in the world.
UNFPA has also been directly involved in national abortion debates. UNFPA, in concert with other international institutions, attempted to intervene in Nicaragua’s abortion debate, sending a letter to the national assembly last year asking the government to reconsider its total ban on abortions.
In Africa, UNFPA was instrumental in helping draft the controversial Maputo Plan of Action, which contains specific advocacy goals and targets regarding “unsafe abortion.” UNFPA executive director Thoraya Obaid has already stated that the Maputo Plan of Action would be the basis for its programmatic actions in Africa.
Earlier this month the US delegation to the UN questioned Obaid on UNFPA’s abortion advocacy. During discussions of UNFPA’s proposed strategic plan, the US delegation stated, “We note that of UNFPA’s three focus areas, two stress reproductive rights. It is our understanding that UNFPA is neutral on the abortion issue, and thus should not be engaging on advocacy relating to abortion legalization.”
Obaid responded that UNFPA does not address the question of legalization of abortion, as it is a national matter, to be determined by national governments. He stressed that UNFPA operates according to the guiding principle of the agreements reached at the 1994 Cairo conference on Population and Development, “where abortion is not against the law, it should be safe.”
UNFPA supporters in the US government have parroted Obaid’s denials and maintain that the organization is innocent of these allegations. In a letter obtained by the Friday Fax, in response to questions from a constituent regarding UNFPA Congressman John Dingell (D-MI) stated, “You are misinformed as to the workings of UNFPA. UNFPA does not provide support for abortions or abortion-related activities anywhere in the world.” Dingell has advocated for the reinstatement of US funding for UNFPA.
The United States recently decided to withhold UNFPA funding for the sixth straight year. The US began withholding its donation in 2002 upon receiving evidence that UNFPA was complicit in China’s brutal one-child policy.
Back to TopLatest Headlines
- Cardinal Rigali: You Can't Claim to be "Reducing Abortions" but Publicly Funding them in D.C.
- General Electric to Use Embryonic Stem Cells for Testing, Phase out Lab Rats
- Ohio Supreme Court Allows Planned Parenthood to Conceal Abortion Records in Sexual Abuse Case
- LifeSiteNews Canada Day and Independence Day Message. Taking a few days off. LSN returns Monday July 6
- Heroically Pro-Life Brazilian Archbishop's Resignation Accepted Under Cloud of Vatican Newspaper Misrepresentation
- Pro-Life Groups Announce New Colorado Personhood Initiative
- Judge Puts Kibosh on DC Gay "Marriage" Referendum
- Al Franken Win Hands Supermajority to Senate Democrats
- Group Funded by Canadian Bishops' D&P Joins with Others to Denounce the "Natural Family" and "Family Rights"
- Financially Troubled Planned Parenthood of El Paso Closes Doors
- Abortion Linked to Subsequent Pre-Term Births, New Research Again Confirms
- New Orleans Homosexual Couple Ask Fed. Court to Overturn Marriage Amendment
- Slim Hope Of New Ontario Progressive Conservative Party Leader Promoting Pro-Life, Pro-Family Issues
- Pope Accepts Resignation of Bishop Caught Involved in Homosexual Encounters
- Young Children Removed from UK Schools for "Inappropriate Sexual Behaviour"
- Northern Ireland Politician Cleared of Wrongdoing after Reiterating Christian Teaching on Homosexual Acts
- UK Conservative Leader Speaks at Gay Pride Fundraiser
- More Letters to the Editor on Canadian Catholic Development and Peace Scandal (July 1)
- Letters to the Editor - Readers Respond to Development and Peace Scandal
- Watch This Dramatic New Video on Catholic Bishops Conference Funding of Pro-Abortion Groups
Most Read this Week
- Homosexual Duke U. Director Charged with Offering Adopted 5-Year-Old for Sex
- Famed Fr. Corapi Calls Canadian Bishops' Dissent from Humanae Vitae "Catastrophic"
- Pope: It is a Childish Faith to Oppose the Church Teaching on Life and Family
- Heroically Pro-Life Brazilian Archbishop's Resignation Accepted Under Cloud of Vatican Newspaper Misrepresentation
- General Electric to Use Embryonic Stem Cells for Testing, Phase Out Lab Rats
- LifeSiteNews Detailed Response to Canadian Bishops' Whitewash Report on Development and Peace
- Young Children Removed from UK Schools for "Inappropriate Sexual Behaviour"
- Is Pro-Choice the New Pro-Life?
- Swedish Parents Won't Tell if Child is Boy or Girl as Gender Experiment
- Cardinal Rigali: You Can't Claim to be "Reducing Abortions" but Publicly Funding them in D.C.
MORE NEWS: 
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page Last 10 Days Archives Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.