Tuesday August 12, 2008
48% of America's Minors Exposed to R-rated Entertainment: Dartmouth College Study
22 million saw "Scary Movie" which sreenit.com gave an "extreme" rating for sexuality, violence and profanity.
By Jenna Murphy
HANOVER, NEW HAMPSHIRE, August 12, 2008 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A newly released study by Dartmouth College experts reveals that movie ratings are ineffective when it comes to barring minors from R-rated (18+) films.
Dartmouth researchers found that approximately 22 million of America's young people between the ages of 10 and 14 (12.5%) have viewed one or more restricted films. The most alarming numbers were recorded for the film Scary Movie with an estimated 48% (10 million) of this same age group having viewed the film despite the 'restricted' rating.
The online, family-friendly film reviewing site, Screenit.com, gives "Scary Movie" an "extreme" rating (the highest possible) for sexuality, violence and profanity.
"Our data reveal a disturbingly high rate of exposure among 10-14 year olds nationally to extremely violent movies," says Keilah Worth, the keynote author of the study and post-doctoral fellow at Dartmouth Medical School and at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center's Norris Cotton Cancer Center. "In Britain, no adolescent would be admitted to these movies unless they were 18. The R-rating in this country is clearly not preventing our young people from seeing them."
It is no secret that exposure to violence as entertainment leads to eventual desensitization. In a joint statement, the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Psychological Association and the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry confirmed that violence in television, in music, in video games and in movies increases violence among children. "Its effects are measurable and long-lasting," the four groups say in a statement. "Moreover, prolonged viewing of media violence can lead to emotional desensitization toward violence in real life."
Dartmouth Researchers were able to pinpoint that Black youth from families with a lower socioeconomic status were most at risk for early exposure to R-rated films.
"No expert in child development would advocate for subjecting children as young as 10 to this level of violence, yet the study shows that such exposure is commonplace in this country," says James Sargent, the senior scientist on this study and a professor of pediatrics at Dartmouth Medical School.
"We should re-think the current movie rating system, which has been in place for 40 years, and was designed when kids could only see movies in theaters. Ratings need to be more prominent on all movies, whether they are seen in theaters or purchased in the store, and we need clearer messages to parents. Pediatricians and child advocates should instruct parents to strictly abide by the movie-age guidelines and to closely monitor movie viewing."
To read Dartmouth Study Press Release:
http://www.dartmouth.edu/~news/releases/2008/08/04.html
To Read Joint Statement on negative effects of Violence in Media by American Health Professionals:
http://www.aap.org/advocacy/releases/jstmtevc.htm
Latest Headlines
- Major Health Care Development - Pro-Life Stupak Amendment Vote OK'd for Today

- NY Times: Dems Banking on Later Squeezing Pro-Life Language Out of Bill in Committee

- USCCB Spokesman: "Definitely Not True" that Bishops Support Bill As it Stands

- TIME Got it Wrong - Prof. George Opposed Grandiose Kennedy Funeral

- USCCB Condemnation Tears Facade off "Phony" Abortion Compromise for Health Bill

- Health Care Bill Includes Monthly Abortion Premium: House Minority Leader Boehner

- TIME Article Setting Burke Against O'Malley Called "Tactical strike" on Behalf of Catholic Left

- Dirty Fighting on Abortion Funding: Word-Games and Health-Care Theatrics Boggle the Mind

- Commentary on November 6 News

- Note to LifeSiteNews Subscribers with Rogers email addresses

- New York Gov. Declares Nov. 10 Extraordinary Legislative Session for Same-Sex "Marriage"

- Washington's Pro-Family Amendment Effort Defeated - R-71 Almost Certain to Pass

- Vote Pushed Back on Canadian Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide Bill to Dec. 2

- Elderly U.K. Couple in Good Health Commit Suicide, Complain of Assisted Suicide Law

- Texas Late-Term Abortionist and Baptist Minister Admits: "Am I killing? Yes, I am"

- New Evidence Contradicts CCHD's Findings on Accused Pro-Abortion Partner

- Quebec Priest Denies Possibility of Sexual Reorientation Therapy on TV

- New Hampshire Same-Sex "Marriage" Law in Crosshairs after Maine's Law Crumbles

- Brooklyn Bishop Criticized for Recorded Message Praising Pro-Abortion Politician

- First Group of "Traditionalist" Anglicans in Britain Votes to Enter Catholic Church

Most Read this Week
- Planned Parenthood Director Resigns after Watching Ultrasound of Abortion Procedure
- Breaking: Dominican Community Apologizes for Nun Caught Acting as Abortion Escort
- Nun Defiant Following Rebuke, but Stops Abortion Escorting
- Over 200 Christendom College Students Protest Abortion at Planned Parenthood Clinic
- Scottish Gay Rights Activists Found Guilty of Pedophilia Sentenced to Life Imprisonment
- Newly Identified Corporate Supporters of Planned Parenthood Named
- TIME Article Setting Burke Against O'Malley Called "Tactical strike" on Behalf of Catholics Left
- Canadian MP Launches Petition to Stop Federal Funding of Planned Parenthood
- Health Care Bill Includes Monthly Abortion Premium: House Minority Leader Boehner
- Planned Parenthood's President Lashes Out at USCCB
MORE NEWS:
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page
Last 10 Days
Archives
Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.








Back to Top