Friday August 15, 2008
Woman Awarded $2.78 Million in Malpractice Suit against Planned Parenthood Associated Doctor
By Thaddeus M. Baklinski
PHILADELPHIA, August 15, 2008 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A woman who went to a Planned Parenthood clinic in Philadelphia in February 2003 to have contraceptive implant rods removed from her arm, has successfully sued the doctor who bungled the removal procedure.
Dana Asbury, a 39-year-old mother of three, was awarded more than $2.78 million in damages in a medical malpractice suit in which she maintained she has suffered excruciating and chronic pain, first, after Dr. Joel Lebed, who was associated with Planned Parenthood of Philadelphia, attempted to remove contraceptive implant rods, and then later when she underwent "unnecessary" neck surgery, said a report by Delcotimes.
"Obviously we're pleased that the jury felt she had a meritorious case," said Asbury's attorney Garland D. Cherry Jr.
The woman's problems began when Dr. Lebed, who was described in the legal papers as "inexperienced" to perform the medical procedure, made several unsuccessful attempts to remove the matchstick-sized rods. Asbury was described as being in severe pain throughout the procedure.
"(Dr. Lebed) gave up after a lot of pain and tears," said attorney Cherry.
Eventually, another doctor in the PP clinic, Janet Wilson, removed all of the rods.
An article published in the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Volume 195, Issue 1, July 2006, titled "Nerve injury caused by removal of an implantable hormonal contraceptive" warns that an experienced clinician is required for proper insertion and removal, to minimize the risk of nerve damage.
"Implanon (a brand of contraceptive implant rods) insertion and removal are relatively uncomplicated procedures in the hands of medical professionals familiar with the technique. However, injury to branches of the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve during Implanon insertion and removal can result in impaired sensibility, severe localized pain, or the formation of painful neuroma that can be quite devastating to the patient."
"In the event that an injury to the nerve is recognized, immediate plastic surgical measures should be undertaken to avoid displeasing sequels of nerve injuries. Therefore, the benefit of this generally well-tolerated, highly effective, and relatively cost-efficient contraception is guaranteed only in the hands of medical professionals familiar with the technique," the article concludes.
Following her surgery Asbury became debilitated because of the ensuing pain that began in her arm and progressively spread until it affected the whole left side of her body. She was consequently diagnosed with complex regional pain syndrome (RPS), which involves a malfunction to the nervous system causing extreme sensitivity and chronic pain.
As a result of the RPS diagnosis, Asbury underwent a cervical laminectomy, a fusion of the cervical vertebrae, the bones of the neck that support the head, at the hands of Dr. Richard Kanoff, a neurosurgeon with Mercy Fitzgerald Hospital.
"The fusion itself was a successful fusion," said attorney Cherry in the DelcoTimesreport. "The hardware was correct and everything held. The only problem was she didn't need it and it worsened her condition."
In awarding the money to Asbury for "past and future loss of earning capacity, future medical care, and pain and suffering" as well as to Asbury's husband for "loss of consortium", the jury determined Dr. Lebed was 60 percent liable for the damages and Dr. Kanoff 40 percent.
Source: DelcoTimes.com
Latest Headlines
- "Manhattan Declaration" Embodies U.S. Christian Pushback against Abortion, Same-Sex "Marriage"

- Hoffman Loses Final Tally of NY-23 Race; Alleges ACORN Tampering and Fraud

- Abortion Activist Judge Hamilton Confirmed with Help of Ten Republican Senators

- CDC Reverses Gardasil Vaccine Requirement for Immigrants

- Germany Faces Economic Downturn with Plummeting Birth Rate and Aging Population

- CCHD in Archdiocese of Chicago Says it is Working to Fix Problems

- Rejection of Washington DC Marriage Referendum Challenged With Legal Suit

- Obama-Supporting Homosexual Activist to Out Sexually Involved Priests Unless they Support Gay 'Marriage

- Austrian Catholic Bishops Issue Bland Response to Govt's Homosexual Partnership Bill

- Interim Report on Catholic Sex-Abuse Says "Homosexual Identity" Not a Predictor of Sex Abuse

- LSN NewsBytes - US Health Care Reform

- LSN NewsBytes - Climate Change/Global Warming

- Pro-Abortion Lawmakers Shower Praise on Senate Bill's Phony Abortion Compromise

- 59 Bishops Contributed Financially to Maine Bishop's Effort to Oppose Maine Same-Sex "Marriage" Law

Most Read this Week
- Largest U.S. Homosexual Publisher Shuts Down, Closing Major Gay Newspapers
- Italian Mayors Order Crufixes Put in Classrooms in Revolt against European Court Ruling
- EWTN's Arroyo Hosts Reform CCHD Reps Who Reveal Shocking Evidence Against USCCB Anti-Poverty Arm
- Nat'l Organization for Marriage Responds to Miss California "Sex Tape" Scandal
- Obama Evades Questioning on Stupak Amendment in FOX Interview
- French Judge Finds Hospital Guilty of "Unreasonable Obstinacy" in Saving Newborn's Life
- EU Leaders to Choose President today in Secret "Soviet Style" Meetings
- Hoffman "Unconcedes" Battle for NY-23: Recount Provides Hope for "Miracle" Victory
- CCHD Responds to Reform Movement
- White House Advisor Indicates Obama Will Work to Abolish Pro-Life Health Amendment
MORE NEWS:
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page
Last 10 Days
Archives
Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.








Back to Top