Monday August 18, 2008
APA Insider says Report on Abortion is a "Politically-Motivated Exercise" in Support of Legal Abortion
By Hilary White
August 18, 2008 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A member of the American Psychological Association and one of the trained psychologists asked by the APA to examine their report on the long-term psychological effects of abortion on women, has concluded that it is nothing more than a "politically-motivated exercise" in support of legal abortion.
Rachel M. MacNair, Ph.D. wrote that after close examination of it, she saw "no evidence" that the APA's report "was actually interested in keeping up with real science."
The report, published earlier this month, claimed to have examined all the available research literature since 1989. It concluded that there were no significant negative psychological effects on women who have abortions.
But MacNair wrote that the APA report was, in essence, based on a single 1995 study, "Termination of pregnancy and psychiatric morbidity", that examined cases of "psychiatric morbidity" after abortion in British women. MacNair is the director of the Institute for Integrated Social Analysis, the research arm of Consistent Life: An International Network for Peace and Life.
"Setting aside the quality of the study itself," MacNair wrote, "citing only one study in support of a politically-desired conclusion cannot be explained in any other way than a politically-motivated exercise."
Furthermore, noted MacNair, the British study did not support the conclusion, having found more cases of drug overdose in women who had abortions compared to others who had not.
The APA's report claimed that the only lasting regret women experience is in those cases where the child was "wanted" and had been aborted for foetal abnormalities. The report's conclusions matched closely the slogans of the abortion lobby in asserting that it is the social "stigma" attached to abortion that causes psychological problems for women and that future research should focus on the "wantedness" of the child.
Dr. MacNair, an APA member on the Association's Board of Division 48, on "peace psychology", had volunteered to be on a team of reviewers for the Report, giving "feedback from a scientific point of view." She said that her conclusion of the report's scientific shortcomings was shared by two other experts on the team whom she knew, one of whom is a self-identified "atheist pro-choicer."
MacNair had already complained about the biases of the task force charged with creating the report. She said that there never had been a general call among the membership of the APA for nominations for membership of the task force. By the time the APA's plans to establish the task force had been made known, its membership had already been decided by Division 35, "psychology of women."
"I knew the fix was in at that point and subsequent events have confirmed this, but I gamely kept trying to talk about balance and science."
MacNair received no response to a memo sent to the APA Council in which she suggested that "a better report would be one that pointed out where the consensus is and where the controversies still are, rather than taking one side in the controversy." Her concerns were ignored when she brought them to the APA Council meeting of Wednesday, August 13.
"To this moment, I don't have an answer to the basic point of how one study, whether an excellent study or not, could possibly be reasonably seen as supporting a bold and ideologically-desired conclusion."
At the meeting, the vote to admit the report was nearly unanimous, with only six abstentions. MacNair said that she asked the APA Council's president-elect why no concerns had been addressed, and was told that the Council's vote was more like a "ribbon-cutting at a building; the building was already built, all the work had already gone in, so that point in time was too late."
Read related LifeSiteNews.com:
Abortion has no Negative Psychological Consequences: American Psychological Association
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2008/aug/08081303.html
Chair of APA Abortion Report Task Force Violates APA Ethics Rules
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2008/aug/08081307.html
Latest Headlines
- Appeal Filed to Give D.C. Voters Right to Vote on Gay “Marriage” Law

- San Francisco Chronicle: “Open Secret” That Prop. 8 Judge is “Gay”

- Cardinal George Denounces "New Ways Ministry" as Pseudo-Catholic Organization

- Vatican: Population Growth is a Means of Overcoming Poverty, Not a Cause of It

- “Bogus Compassion” is Killing Children and Corrupting Society: Belgian Philosopher

- Indian Court Rules Born and Unborn Are Equal

- United Nations Urges Nicaragua to Legalize Abortion

- Vatican Consultant Responds to 'Completely Ignorant' IPPF Accusation

- Irony: 19-Child Duggar Family Renting Former Home of Local Planned Parenthood Leader

- Document Reveals Inconsistencies in ND's Jenkins Claims on ND88

- New Country Music Star Born as Pro-Life Ballad Climbs the Charts

- Commentary on February 8 News

- Police Refuse to Release Federal "Threat Assessment" on Wis. Pro-Lifers

- Canadian Human Rights Commission Appeals Ruling against Hate Messages Statute

- Homosexual Activist Keith Norton Dies at 69

- Letters to the Editor

Most Read this Week
- Veterans, Former Army Legal Chief Defend “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”
- Planned Parenthood President Lands Spot on Ford Foundation Board
- Rabbis Warn against 'Disaster' of Open Homosexuality in the Military
- Football Pros Give Support to Tim Tebow Super Bowl Ad
- Clash of the Abortion Titans: Planned Parenthood Launches 'Pro-Choice' Football Ad
- Canadian Station Pulls Pro-Life Ad – Too “Graphic”
- Hijacking the Brain — How Pornography Works
- Group Exposes Media "Fraud" at March for Life
- U.S. Sisters in Crisis after Embracing “Secular Culture”: Vatican Cardinal
- NYT: Rampant Polygamy in Gay 'Marriage' May Benefit Institution
MORE NEWS:
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page
Last 10 Days
Archives
Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.








Back to Top