Monday February 4, 2008


New York Court Rules State Must Validate Canadian Homosexual "Marriages"
By Hilary White
ROCHESTER, New York, February 4, 2008 (LifeSiteNews.com) - In a victory for homosexual political activists, the Appellate Division of State Supreme Court of New York on Friday declared that same-sex "marriages" recognized as legal in other countries must be considered valid in the state for purposes of employee benefits.
The suit to force Monroe Community College in Rochester to extend health benefits to lesbian partner Lisa Golden was brought by an employee of the college, Patricia Martinez.
Martinez and Golden undertook a marriage ceremony in Canada in 2004. Martinez, a word processing supervisor, sued the school in 2005. A previous judge had ruled in favour of the college. The appeals court, however, ruled that the "marriage" between the two women "is entitled to recognition in New York in the absence of express legislation to the contrary."
The court ruled unanimously, "The Legislature may decide to prohibit the recognition of same-sex marriages solemnized abroad. Until it does so, however, such marriages are entitled to recognition in New York."
The case was brought as a test by the far left advocacy group the New York Civil Liberties Union (NYCLU), who admitted that the purpose of the exercise was to extend the homosexual political efforts through the courts. James Esseks, Litigation Director of the Lesbian Gay Bisexual and Transgender Project of the NYCLU, was specific that the case was part of a larger political effort to abolish the traditional definition of marriage in the state.
"But there is still lots of work to be done here. It's now up to the state legislature to finish the job it started last year and pass the marriage bill so that lesbian and gay New Yorkers won't have to leave the state to celebrate their commitments," Esseks said.
The ruling may create a conflict with a previous decision from the New York Court of Appeals that ruled in 2006 that homosexual couples have no right to be issued marriage licenses by local officials, framing the issue as a matter of the state Constitution. At that time, Justice Smith wrote for the Court, "We hold that the New York Constitution does not compel recognition of marriages between members of the same sex. Whether such marriages should be recognized is a question to be addressed by the legislature."
But since 1989, when the world's first legal "civil union" was contracted between two men in Copenhagen, Denmark, it has been courts, not legislatures, that have been used successfully to bring about the weakening - and ultimately in Canada, Spain and the Netherlands, the abolition - of the traditional definition of marriage and family.
In 1971, two men, Jack Baker and James Michael McConnell applied for a marriage license in Hennepin County, Minnesota. The license was denied, a decision that was appealed all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, which refused to hear the case. This court battle was to set the programme for the homosexual political movement over the next thirty years. Throughout the 1990's several European countries introduced legal equivalents to natural marriage for homosexual partners, whether called "civil unions", "civil partnerships", or "domestic partnerships".
In 2000, the Netherlands passed a law that allowed such partnerships to be called "marriage". After several court cases were won by homosexual activists, an Ontario appeals court ordered the Canadian government to institute "gay marriage," which was done in June 2004.
See related LifeSiteNews.com coverage:
New York's Highest Court Rules 4-2 In Favour Of Traditional Marriage
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2006/jul/06070601.html
SHARE THIS STORY:
E-mail
Print
Newsvine
Digg
Reddit
Del.icio.us
Facebook
Latest Headlines
- Pro-Abortion Expression Permitted, Pro-Life Forbidden on Campus at Australia University

- Quebec Mayor Vows to Continue Prayer Despite Human Rights Commission Order

- Ontario Forces Taxpayers to Pay for Sex-Change Operations

- California Supreme Court Asked to Stay "Gay Marriage" Order until November Public Ballot

- Anglican Acceptance of both Abortion and Sanctity of Life will Allow the Creation of a Gay Church Says Bishop

- Governor Schwarzenegger Vows to Fight Reinstatement of Traditional Marriage

- President Bush and California Bishops Oppose Judicial Activism

- Internet Expertise to Save You Time and Money

- Abortifacient Morning After Pill Now Sold off the Shelf in Canada

- UK Commons Embryo Bill Debate Heated with "Wooly Liberal Thinking"

- Letters to the Editor for May 16th, 2008

Most Read this Week
- Texas Pastor Connected with Prominent Gay Porn Website
- Texas Pastor Resigns After Involvement in Gay Porn Site Exposed
- Archbishop: For the Clergy Obedience to Church "Requires Preaching About the Moral Evil of Contraception"
- California Supreme Court Imposes Homosexual 'Marriage' on State
- Even the Leaders Think the Homosexual Activist Movement in Canada is Going Too Far
- Christian Ministry to Disabled Drops its Code of Conduct Under Human Rights Tribunal Pressure
- More and More Seeing that "The Pill Kills"
- Time Magazine: "Want to wreck the environment? Have a baby." - Prince Philip Concurs
- Pope Reminds Spouses of their "Responsibility To Generate New Children"
- Analysis: Ontario Human Rights Code Being Used to Beat Christianity out of the Public Square
MORE NEWS:
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page
Last 10 Days
Archives
Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any Internet re-publishing of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews that have come from other news sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.


Back to Top