Tuesday January 29, 2008
Toronto Suburb Agrees to Delay Consideration of Proposal to Tax Churches
By Thaddeus M. Baklinski
BRAMPTON, Ontario January 29, 2008 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Brampton Faith Coalition, a group organized to present a united challenge to the city's proposals to impose severe restrictions on places of worship, has announced that the City of Brampton has again postponed looking at a controversial "secret" study.
A copy of the study, which had been commissioned by the City of Brampton, was leaked earlier this month, and caused an outcry from religious leaders.
Many of the study's suggestions have been described as eerily reminiscent of measures taken by communist regimes, to quell religious activity.
Recommendations include: taxing all "non-worship space" owned by religious organizations such as halls, nurseries, offices, kitchens, parking lots, etc (only the actual space where the congregation gathers for worship would be tax exempt); redefining what constitutes a "place of worship", including removing of provisions expressly allowing church properties to be used for community services such as day care or study centers; placing severe restrictions on the establishment of new churches, including regulating what space these start-ups could rent, where, and for how long; establishing a ratio of one place of worship for every ten thousand residents; and substantially increasing permit fees for renovation, new construction, and zoning and variance issues.
The City of Brampton has agreed to delay considering the study for at least six months, and has also agreed to allow the Brampton Faith Coalition to have input into the consideration of the study.
The points of issue with Brampton's places of worship study, according to the Brampton Faith Coalition website (http://www.bramptonfaithcoalition.com/issues.htm) are:
i. There is no pathway for beginning faith groups to follow and progress effectively into their own permanent facilities.
ii. Developer "reserve sites" are not sufficient to provide for Brampton's place of worship growth and the timetable offered is too challenging to meet. (Page 29. Items 5,6 & 7)
iii. The proposed guidelines for housing "incubator" congregations are too restrictive. (Page 42, Item 7)
iv. Community functions have been removed from the definition of worship, thus eliminating vital aspects of effective worship and service by the faith community (Page 42, Item 6)
v. Multi-use and multi-zoning within a place of worship designation will not be allowed. (Page 42, Item 7)
vi. Regular meetings of small groups in homes will be limited to 20 people, which could restrict effective ministry. (Page 43, Item 14)
Read previous LifeSiteNews.com coverage:
Church Property Tax Exemption, Freedom of Religion and Association in Peril In Ontario City
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2008/jan/08010407.html
City Suggestion to Tax Churches Gets Shelved after Public Scrutiny
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2008/jan/08010903.html
Latest Headlines
- BREAKING: US Congress Passes Health Care Reform Bill 220 to 215

- Stupak Amendment to Health Care Bill Passes 240 - 194 Saturday Evening

- Major Health Care Development - Pro-Life Stupak Amendment Vote OK'd for Today

- NY Times: Dems Banking on Later Squeezing Pro-Life Language Out of Bill in Committee

- USCCB Spokesman: "Definitely Not True" that Bishops Support Bill As it Stands

- TIME Got it Wrong - Prof. George Opposed Grandiose Kennedy Funeral

- USCCB Condemnation Tears Facade off "Phony" Abortion Compromise for Health Bill

- Health Care Bill Includes Monthly Abortion Premium: House Minority Leader Boehner

- TIME Article Setting Burke Against O'Malley Called "Tactical strike" on Behalf of Catholic Left

- Dirty Fighting on Abortion Funding: Word-Games and Health-Care Theatrics Boggle the Mind

- Commentary on November 6 News

- Note to LifeSiteNews Subscribers with Rogers email addresses

- New York Gov. Declares Nov. 10 Extraordinary Legislative Session for Same-Sex "Marriage"

- Washington's Pro-Family Amendment Effort Defeated - R-71 Almost Certain to Pass

- Vote Pushed Back on Canadian Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide Bill to Dec. 2

- Elderly U.K. Couple in Good Health Commit Suicide, Complain of Assisted Suicide Law

- Texas Late-Term Abortionist and Baptist Minister Admits: "Am I killing? Yes, I am"

- New Evidence Contradicts CCHD's Findings on Accused Pro-Abortion Partner

- Quebec Priest Denies Possibility of Sexual Reorientation Therapy on TV

- New Hampshire Same-Sex "Marriage" Law in Crosshairs after Maine's Law Crumbles

- Brooklyn Bishop Criticized for Recorded Message Praising Pro-Abortion Politician

- First Group of "Traditionalist" Anglicans in Britain Votes to Enter Catholic Church

Most Read this Week
- Planned Parenthood Director Resigns after Watching Ultrasound of Abortion Procedure
- Nun Defiant Following Rebuke, but Stops Abortion Escorting
- Breaking: Dominican Community Apologizes for Nun Caught Acting as Abortion Escort
- TIME Article Setting Burke Against O'Malley Called "Tactical strike" on Behalf of Catholics Left
- Over 200 Christendom College Students Protest Abortion at Planned Parenthood Clinic
- Newly Identified Corporate Supporters of Planned Parenthood Named
- Scottish Gay Rights Activists Found Guilty of Pedophilia Sentenced to Life Imprisonment
- US Congress Passes Health Care Reform Bill 218 to 215
- Major Health Care Bill Development - Stupak Hyde Amendment Vote OK'd
- Health Care Bill Includes Monthly Abortion Premium: House Minority Leader Boehner
MORE NEWS:
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page
Last 10 Days
Archives
Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.








Back to Top