Politics
Monday July 21, 2008
See today's LifeSiteNews stories
Court Rules Bush Admin Wrong to Fine CBS for Super Bowl Janet Jackson Striptease
By John-Henry Westen
WASHINGTON, July 21, 2008 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A three-judge panel of the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals ruled today against the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) fine imposed on CBS for airing footage of singer Janet Jackson's nude breast during the 2004 Super Bowl.
The nearly 90 million viewers tuned into CBS during the Superbowl halftime show heard Justin Timberlake sing the line, "Gonna have you naked by the end of this song," as he removed a key part of Jackson's garments in what was claimed by the station to be a "wardrobe malfunction."
Federal judges, Anthony J. Scirica, Marjorie O. Rendell and Julio M. Fuentes, scrapped the $550,000 fine imposed on CBS Corp., accepting the explanation that the incident was "unscripted."
The court claimed that the action was not "pervasive as to amount to 'shock treatment' for the audience." The judges said the FCC "acted arbitrarily and capriciously" in issuing the fine for the fleeting nudity.
Concerned Women for America (CWA) was outraged by the decision. "It is utterly incomprehensible that a court would decide that exposing Janet Jackson live on network television to 90 million viewers worldwide was not offensive," said CWA President Wendy Wright. "The court claims this notorious act was not 'pervasive as to amount to "shock treatment" for the audience' but the wardrobe malfunction was clearly intended to shock the worldwide audience. It incited unprecedented outrage and immediate phone calls and emails from viewers to the FCC."
As a result of this incident, Congress overwhelmingly passed the Broadcast Decency Act to increase broadcast indecency fines in 2006.
Shari Rendall, Director of Legislation and Public Policy at CWA, pointed out that "Broadcasters filed this case in the liberal Philadelphia court which has a history of poor decisions on obscenity. The FCC's ability to enforce broadcast decency standards has been severely compromised as a result of today's decision."
See the ruling online here:
http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/063575p.pdf
To express concerns email the court here:
wdpacomments_fpd@ca3.uscourts.gov
Back to TopSHARE THIS STORY: E-mail Print Newsvine Digg Reddit Del.icio.us Facebook
Latest Headlines
- Legislators Seek Abortion-on-Demand for Every State in Mexico
- Video Catches Planned Parenthood Covering Up Statutory Rape
- Kenyan Cardinal Blasts Attempt to Legalise Abortion
- Franciscan University Board Member Backs Obama, School Distances Itself
- Democratic Platform Promises, Republican Platform Rejects More Abortion Overseas
- San Francisco Catholic Charities Ends Relationship with the US' "Gayest Adoption Agency"
- US Government Cuts Off Supplies to Marie Stopes International
- Pope Commends Knights of Columbus for their Pro-Life Work
- The 16th International Week of Prayer and Fasting
- Billy Graham to Turn 90: Public Invited to Send Personal Stories, Birthday Wishes
- Catholic Magazine Calls For Defeat And Removal Of Prime Minister Harper
Most Read this Week
- Extreme Pro-Abortion Feminist Heather Mallick Scheduled to Speak at Catholic St. Mary's University
- Sarah Palin Speaks on Abortion, Contraception, Homosexuality
- Martin Sheen Stars in Ad Opposing Assisted Suicide in Washington State
- Abortion Patient of George Tiller Feared for Life: 'They're Liable to Kill Me'
- Bella Star Eduardo Saves Five Unborn Babies' Lives
- CBC Apologises for "Porn Star" Attack on Palin
- Russia: 64% of Pregnancies End in Abortion
- Catholic Magazine Calls For Defeat And Removal Of Prime Minister Harper
- Eduardo Verastegui Talks about Obama, Saving Babies Outside L.A. Abortion Clinic
- Swedish Man Awarded $24,170 Compensation after Filming Himself Having Sex with 14 Year-Old
MORE NEWS: 
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page Last 10 Days Archives Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.