Politics
Monday July 21, 2008
Court Rules Bush Admin Wrong to Fine CBS for Super Bowl Janet Jackson Striptease
TODAY'S HEADLINES
E-MAIL
PRINT
By John-Henry Westen
WASHINGTON, July 21, 2008 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A three-judge panel of the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals ruled today against the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) fine imposed on CBS for airing footage of singer Janet Jackson's nude breast during the 2004 Super Bowl.
The nearly 90 million viewers tuned into CBS during the Superbowl halftime show heard Justin Timberlake sing the line, "Gonna have you naked by the end of this song," as he removed a key part of Jackson's garments in what was claimed by the station to be a "wardrobe malfunction."
Federal judges, Anthony J. Scirica, Marjorie O. Rendell and Julio M. Fuentes, scrapped the $550,000 fine imposed on CBS Corp., accepting the explanation that the incident was "unscripted."
The court claimed that the action was not "pervasive as to amount to 'shock treatment' for the audience." The judges said the FCC "acted arbitrarily and capriciously" in issuing the fine for the fleeting nudity.
Concerned Women for America (CWA) was outraged by the decision. "It is utterly incomprehensible that a court would decide that exposing Janet Jackson live on network television to 90 million viewers worldwide was not offensive," said CWA President Wendy Wright. "The court claims this notorious act was not 'pervasive as to amount to "shock treatment" for the audience' but the wardrobe malfunction was clearly intended to shock the worldwide audience. It incited unprecedented outrage and immediate phone calls and emails from viewers to the FCC."
As a result of this incident, Congress overwhelmingly passed the Broadcast Decency Act to increase broadcast indecency fines in 2006.
Shari Rendall, Director of Legislation and Public Policy at CWA, pointed out that "Broadcasters filed this case in the liberal Philadelphia court which has a history of poor decisions on obscenity. The FCC's ability to enforce broadcast decency standards has been severely compromised as a result of today's decision."
See the ruling online here:
http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/063575p.pdf
To express concerns email the court here:
Back to TopLatest Headlines
- Appeal Filed to Give D.C. Voters Right to Vote on Gay “Marriage” Law
- San Francisco Chronicle: “Open Secret” That Prop. 8 Judge is “Gay”
- Cardinal George Denounces "New Ways Ministry" as Pseudo-Catholic Organization
- Vatican: Population Growth is a Means of Overcoming Poverty, Not a Cause of It
- “Bogus Compassion” is Killing Children and Corrupting Society: Belgian Philosopher
- Indian Court Rules Born and Unborn Are Equal
- United Nations Urges Nicaragua to Legalize Abortion
- Vatican Consultant Responds to 'Completely Ignorant' IPPF Accusation
- Irony: 19-Child Duggar Family Renting Former Home of Local Planned Parenthood Leader
- Document Reveals Inconsistencies in ND's Jenkins Claims on ND88
- New Country Music Star Born as Pro-Life Ballad Climbs the Charts
- Commentary on February 8 News
- Police Refuse to Release Federal "Threat Assessment" on Wis. Pro-Lifers
- Canadian Human Rights Commission Appeals Ruling against Hate Messages Statute
- Homosexual Activist Keith Norton Dies at 69
- Letters to the Editor
Most Read this Week
- Veterans, Former Army Legal Chief Defend “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”
- Planned Parenthood President Lands Spot on Ford Foundation Board
- Rabbis Warn against 'Disaster' of Open Homosexuality in the Military
- Football Pros Give Support to Tim Tebow Super Bowl Ad
- Clash of the Abortion Titans: Planned Parenthood Launches 'Pro-Choice' Football Ad
- Canadian Station Pulls Pro-Life Ad – Too “Graphic”
- Hijacking the Brain — How Pornography Works
- Group Exposes Media "Fraud" at March for Life
- U.S. Sisters in Crisis after Embracing “Secular Culture”: Vatican Cardinal
- NYT: Rampant Polygamy in Gay 'Marriage' May Benefit Institution
MORE NEWS: 
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page Last 10 Days Archives Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.