Thursday June 5, 2008
Canadian City Backpedals on Decision to Censor Pro-life Bus-shelter Ads
By John Jalsevac
HAMILTON, ON, June 5, 2008 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The city of Hamilton, Ontario, has announced that it will be revising its rules so as to allow pro-life advertisements to be displayed in city bus shelters and other similar city-owned advertising spots.
The decision signals a dramatic shift in policy for the city, which pulled a pro-life ad campaign in January, calling the advertisements too "controversial".
The ads, which were part of a nation-wide pro-life campaign coordinated by Life Canada, depicted a pregnant woman. At the top of the ad were the words, "Nine months: the length of time abortion is allowed in Canada. No medical reason needed." At the bottom of the ad is the question, "Abortion, have we gone too far?"
The decision to pull the ads was made after Hamilton's transit office received three complaints, and one of the ads was vandalized with pro-abortion graffiti. A city councilor, Brian McHattie, also personally submitted a request for the ads to be removed, saying that they were "offensive," and "totally inappropriate".
Subsequently Hamilton Right to Life, which had sponsored the ad campaign, filed a human rights complaint against the city.
Peter Boushy, a lawyer and the secretary for Hamilton Right to Life filed the complaint on behalf of the pro-life organization. He says that he now credits the complaint with having pressured the city into changing its unfair policy.
"No one wants to be labeled a human rights violator," Boushy told LifeSiteNews.com in an interview today.
Boushy said that he and Hamilton Right to Life welcomed the city's decision, which has yet to be ratified by city council. According to an e-mail from a member of the Hamilton Public Works Committee, sent to Father Slaman of Hamilton Right to Life, the decision will come before the council on June 11.
"Coming on the heels of our complaint to the Ontario Human Rights Commission, this new decision by the Hamilton Director of Transit to allow religious and advocacy messaging in the bus shelters is healthy for a society that values freedom of expression," said Boushy. "We are hopeful that the decision will be ratified by city council. Now, in terms of the whole Right to Life issue, it is important that the public understand that there is absolutely no law whatsoever regulating abortions in Canada. This is a grave injustice that urgently needs to be rectified and I would urge all like-minded persons to call upon their politicians to help the pro-life movement in this regard."
Boushy told The Interim earlier this month that Hamilton Right to Life opted to pursue a human rights complaint against the city instead of simply a lawsuit in order to drive home the point that the issue is an issue that encompasses the rights of an entire group - the unborn. "What we wanted to do is widen the scope and importance of this particular issue," he said, "because we're dealing with the rights of the unborn or, in our opinion, the rights the unborn should have."
In their complaint Hamilton Right to Life demanded a total of a mere $1 in damages.
The proposed changes to the city's advertising policies will not only apply to pro-life ads, but to all advertising that is religious or that involves advocacy of some kind.
"It's not defensible to continue to restrict this form of advertising," Don Hull, the city's director of transit told councilors on Monday, according to the Hamilton Spectator.
Previously Hull had stood firmly behind the city's decision, saying in January, "We don't think it's appropriate for that medium (bus shelters) to be used for controversial community messaging."
See related LifeSiteNews.com coverage:
Right to Life Group Files Complaint with Ontario Human Rights Commission
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2008/apr/08040202.html
Canadian City Pulls Pro-Life Bus Shelter Ads Citing "Offensiveness"
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2008/jan/08011701.html
More Canadian City Officials Censor Pro-Life Ads
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2008/jan/08012804.html
Latest Headlines
- Cardinal George Denounces "New Ways Ministry" as Pseudo-Catholic Organization

- “Bogus Compassion” is Killing Children and Corrupting Society: Belgian Philosopher

- Indian Court Rules Born and Unborn Are Equal

- Irony: 19-Child Duggar Family Renting Former Home of Local Planned Parenthood Leader

- Document Reveals Inconsistencies in ND's Jenkins Claims on ND88

- New Country Music Star Born as Pro-Life Ballad Climbs the Charts

- Commentary on February 8 News

- B.C. Civil Liberties Association Goes to Bat for Pro-Life Student Club

- Police Refuse to Release Federal "Threat Assessment" on Wis. Pro-Lifers

- Canadian Human Rights Commission Appeals Ruling against Hate Messages Statute

- Homosexual Activist Keith Norton Dies at 69

- Malta Celebrates 32nd Pro-Life Day

- My Vote for Best Pro-life Super Bowl Ad: Google’s Parisian Love Story

- Pope: Family Necessary for Child Development

- Letters to the Editor

Most Read this Week
- Veterans, Former Army Legal Chief Defend “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”
- Planned Parenthood President Lands Spot on Ford Foundation Board
- Rabbis Warn against 'Disaster' of Open Homosexuality in the Military
- Football Pros Give Support to Tim Tebow Super Bowl Ad
- Clash of the Abortion Titans: Planned Parenthood Launches 'Pro-Choice' Football Ad
- Canadian Station Pulls Pro-Life Ad – Too “Graphic”
- Hijacking the Brain — How Pornography Works
- Group Exposes Media "Fraud" at March for Life
- U.S. Sisters in Crisis after Embracing “Secular Culture”: Vatican Cardinal
- NYT: Rampant Polygamy in Gay 'Marriage' May Benefit Institution
MORE NEWS:
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page
Last 10 Days
Archives
Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.








Back to Top