Politics
Wednesday March 12, 2008
See today's LifeSiteNews stories
Commentary: The Boycott that Didn't Happen
By Matthew Cullinan Hoffman
March 12, 2008 (LifeSiteNews.com) - For over two years, the 3.4 million member American Family Association ran a boycott of the Ford Motor Company, gathering three quarters of a million online signatures on a pledge not to buy the company's products. It ended the campaign on Monday after confirming that Ford had mostly ended its support for homosexual political causes and publications.
AFA's campaign against Ford was provoked by the company's unusual enthusiasm for all things "gay." The company advertised in homosexual magazines and contributed to organizations that promote "gay marriage" and other atrocities against the family. It also contributed to gay "pride" celebrations, and placed booths at such events.
The boycott quickly gathered steam. Hundreds of thousands of people signed the pledge, and millions of AFA members received the organization's lurid reports on Ford's sponsorship of publications promoting sodomy and other perversions. Many other pro-family organizations endorsed the boycott as well.
Shortly after the boycott began, Ford's sales plummeted, and the company lost money almost every single month thereafter. Ford's continual slump was the subject of much discussion. Analysts began to wonder if it could survive.
However, if you didn't know the AFA campaign was occurring, you are probably not alone. As far as the mainstream media was concerned, it wasn't happening either. Despite the fact of the massive boycott, and despite the fact that Ford was losing billions of dollars annually, the mainstream media almost never mentioned it.
Although some outlets, including USA Today and CNN, reported the boycott at its inception, it was rarely acknowledged thereafter, despite the serious, continuing financial crisis experienced by Ford. Month after month, quarter after quarter, the automotive giant reported staggering losses, while its competitors made profits. The media, and Ford, blamed everything but the boycott.
Although the mainstream media didn't seem to notice AFA's devastating campaign, Ford's dealerships did. In 2006, at the beginning of the conflict, the Greater Texas Ford Dealers Advertising Fund, representing 78 state dealerships, sent a letter pleading with the company to concede to AFA's demands.
"To be clear we strongly urge that Ford not only cease to advertise in homosexual related media and events, but in all politically charged and controversial media and events," the dealers reportedly wrote.
The media's failure - or refusal - to cover the boycott, however, didn't prevent it from having its effect. After months of negative publicity and financial losses, the automotive giant began to meet AFA's demands. According to the organization's announcement on Monday, Ford is now "basically" complying with an original 2005 agreement to stop advertising in homosexual publications, and to cease funding groups that promote homosexual "marriage".
Paradoxically, the nonexistent boycott suddenly sprang into being. Business Week, Forbes, the Detroit News, and other publications ran stories on it, quoting Ford to the effect that the changes in its spending merely reflect cutbacks in its budget, not a change of policy.
Although Ford claims it still has a relationship with "Parents and Friends of Lesbians and Gays" and the "Human Rights Campaign", two groups that support homosexual marriage, it has apparently modified its pro-homosexual spending sufficiently to satisfy the AFA.
The successful boycott of Ford is a powerful example of the influence that pro-family groups and individuals can have if they unite for a common cause. The often discouraging abuse of the mainstream media's power to influence our society's perception of reality, of what is important or even what is real, proved to be of no avail against a determined and well organized pro-family organization. Reader, take note.
Back to TopSHARE THIS STORY: E-mail Print Newsvine Digg Reddit Del.icio.us Facebook
Latest Headlines
- Pro-Abortion Expression Permitted, Pro-Life Forbidden on Campus at Australia University
- Quebec Mayor Vows to Continue Prayer Despite Human Rights Commission Order
- Ontario Forces Taxpayers to Pay for Sex-Change Operations
- California Supreme Court Asked to Stay "Gay Marriage" Order until November Public Ballot
- Anglican Acceptance of both Abortion and Sanctity of Life will Allow the Creation of a Gay Church Says Bishop
- Governor Schwarzenegger Vows to Fight Reinstatement of Traditional Marriage
- President Bush and California Bishops Oppose Judicial Activism
- Internet Expertise to Save You Time and Money
- Abortifacient Morning After Pill Now Sold off the Shelf in Canada
- UK Commons Embryo Bill Debate Heated with "Wooly Liberal Thinking"
- Letters to the Editor for May 16th, 2008
Most Read this Week
- Texas Pastor Connected with Prominent Gay Porn Website
- Texas Pastor Resigns After Involvement in Gay Porn Site Exposed
- Archbishop Publicly Tells Pro-Abortion Kansas Governor Not to Receive Communion
- Archbishop: For the Clergy Obedience to Church "Requires Preaching About the Moral Evil of Contraception"
- California Supreme Court Imposes Homosexual 'Marriage' on State
- Even the Leaders Think the Homosexual Activist Movement in Canada is Going Too Far
- Christian Ministry to Disabled Drops its Code of Conduct Under Human Rights Tribunal Pressure
- Time Magazine: "Want to wreck the environment? Have a baby." - Prince Philip Concurs
- More and More Seeing that "The Pill Kills"
- Pope Reminds Spouses of their "Responsibility To Generate New Children"
MORE NEWS: 
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page Last 10 Days Archives Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any Internet re-publishing of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews that have come from other news sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.