Wednesday March 19, 2008


No, It is Not Okay for Christian Couples to View Porn Together as a Warm Up for Sex
Religious leaders must fill the knowledge vacuum on authentic healthy human sexuality
Editorial by John-Henry Westen
From time to time I am asked to do speaking engagements and more often than not I'm asked to speak on the controversial subject of human sexuality. I just returned from an awesome retreat where organizers urged me to give my usual, no-holds-barred talk on sexuality to over 150 adults.
Well, what a reaction! There were questions galore from Christians who many assumed would know all about such issues. One discussion that needs to be highlighted, however, was one I had with a Catholic marriage counselor.
Now, don't get me wrong. This woman was a sincere, believing Christian. She explained that she was rather taken aback at my talk with its blanket condemnation of pornography as extremely unhealthy from a psychological and spiritual level. She informed me that she was told by a priest that married couples, especially those having trouble with stimulation, could view pornographic movies together in order to assist their marital relations. She told me, moreover, that she did not feel comfortable with the advice at first, so she asked another priest who also said such viewing of pornography by married couples was perfectly acceptable.
Although I was dismayed, I cannot say I was surprised as I've been reporting on scandals such as this for over a dozen years. The advice is of course totally opposed to Catholic teaching.
So, as gently as I could possibly muster, I explained both the Christian and psychological/emotional reasoning for the absolute banning of pornography.
Firstly, I explained repeatedly that in Matthew 5:27-28 Our Lord explains clearly: "You have heard that it was said to them of old: Thou shalt not commit adultery. But I say to you, that whosoever shall look on a woman to lust after her, hath already committed adultery with her in his heart."
Clearly the husband/wife viewing pornography is looking at the other women/men in the film and lusting after them. So rather than an aid in healthy sexuality for the husband and wife it is mutual adultery.
Further, still from a Christian perspective, pornographic films are produced in grave sin, sin which is the cause of Christ's suffering and death which is especially remembered during Lent. What are we watching in such films is the commission of grave offenses against God and his gift of marital love and pro-creation.
But from a psychological perspective the watching of porn is also deadly. Studies have shown that the watching of pornography is addictive, and the images seen are etched almost permanently into memory. Such images pervade the imagination, especially at the most inopportune moments such as when normal sexual relations between married spouses is attempted.
Adultery in the imagination, or by watching porn, leads inevitably to infidelity either in person or virtually. Adultery usually leads to marriage breakdown and the nightmare of divorce.
How is it that Christian couples can be given such deadly advice? How is it that religious leaders can imagine such destructive suggestions can possibly lead to sexual and spiritual health?
It is because we have a vacuum of true sexual education, coupled with a plethora of lies stemming from the secular world.
Sexuality is a gift from God. It is geared to a man and a woman giving themselves to each other freely, totally, faithfully and fruitfully until death do they part. Any sexual activity outside of that, whether it be pre-marital, adulterous, by force, with self, same-sex, or contraceptive is harmful physically, psychologically and spiritually.
Spiritual leaders should have no fear in proclaiming these authentic truths. They do so not out of a 'have no fun' attitude, but out of true care and concern for those to whom they minister.
SHARE THIS STORY:
E-mail
Print
Newsvine
Digg
Reddit
Del.icio.us
Facebook
Latest Headlines
- Canadian Pro-Life Leader Gives Last Minute Information to Federal Election Voters

- Addressing the American and Canadian Voters from Abroad

- Obama Not Natural Born Citizen? Ineligible to Run For President?
- Boycott Successful: McDonald's Abandons Homosexual Activism

- After Two Weeks of 40 Days for Life - 114 Babies Saved from Abortion

- Toronto Archbishop Decries Morgentaler Order of Canada - Sets Sunday as Day of Prayer Against Abortion

- Massachusetts Bishops Vacillate on Defense of Marriage Petition Campaign
- Shock: Connecticut Supreme Court Strikes Down State Ban on Same-sex "Marriage"

- Massachusetts Bishops Vacillate on Defense of Marriage Petition Campaign
- Victoria, Australia Decriminalises Abortion: Criminalises Doctors' Consciences

- Pro-life Efforts Redouble as U.K. Embryo Bill Goes Back to House of Commons

- Mark Steyn "Not Guilty" of "Islamophobia": Human Rights Commission

- Gibbons Charged With Disobeying a Court Order

- Host Desecration Videos Back on YouTube

- Brampton Catholic High School To Host Pro-abort Liberal Leader Stephane Dion

- Exclusive Interview with "Fireproof" Co-Star Erin Bethea

- Oregon Court Orders Frozen Embryos Destroyed, Considered "Property Rights" Issue

- Canadian Archdiocese Advertising Fundraiser for Anti-Catholic Abortion/Condom Promoter

- Barbara Kay - Poland's "preemie miracle" is an embarrassing postscript to Henry Morgentaler's Order of Canada
- US Election News Highlights - October 11, 2008

- LifeSiteNews.com NewsBytes for October 11, 2008

Most Read this Week
- Canadian Artist and Catholic Novelist Michael O'Brien on Modesty in the Culture of Shamelessness
- Amazing Stories Come out of 2008 Life Chain
- Massachusetts Bishops Vacillate on Defense of Marriage Petition Campaign
- Video Catches Planned Parenthood Covering Up Statutory Rape
- Heartland Christian Church Demands Peaceful Pro-Life LifeChain Participants Leave
- Franciscan University Board Member Backs Obama, School Distances Itself
- The Palin-Biden Debate and Where Things Stand Now
- Mandatory Homosexual Indoctrination in Grade School Survives after Supreme Court Turns Down Case
- The Silver Lining of an Obama Victory
- Harper Would Have to Personally Kill an Unborn Baby to Avoid the Hidden Agenda Charge
MORE NEWS:
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page
Last 10 Days
Archives
Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.


Back to Top