Tuesday March 25, 2008


Deep Sedation is Often "Slow Euthanasia"
By Alex Schadenberg of the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition
Editor's note: The following commentary from Alex Schadenberg comes in response to a study in the Netherlands which found that 1,800 people - 7.1 percent of all deaths in the Netherlands in 2005 - were drugged into so-called continuous deep sedation shortly before dying. This compares with 5.6 percent of cases in 2001. At the same time, the use of euthanasia fell from 2.6 percent of all deaths to 1.7 percent, representing a decrease of 1,200 cases.
The question of the use of deep sedation in the Netherlands as the alternative form of euthanasia is an important question.
In the case of deep sedation, a person is usually sedated and then fluids and food are withdrawn, resulting in an intentional death by dehydration or "slow euthanasia."
Intentionally killing someone by injection (or as Dignitas Clinic in Switzerland now does, with a plastic bag and helium) usually takes several minutes and usually not more than one hour.
To intentionally kill someone by dehydration usually takes 10 - 14 days.
The problem with the moral assessment of deep sedation is that not all acts of deep sedation are related to decisions to intentionally kill the person. Sometimes a person is very near to death and experiencing intractable pain. The person is sedated and dies within a few days. This is not euthanasia, but in fact good palliative care.
Deep sedation can also be used in other cases when someone is not near to death but also experiencing intractable pain. These people can be sedated for several days. Fluids and food, however, should be continued, and after the short period of time the person comes out of the sedated state. These people are sometimes relaxed from their time of sedation and can be effectively treated for pain and symptom management without re-sedating them.
The point is: deep sedation can be used as a form of "slow euthanasia" or it can be effectively used as a form of good palliative care.
We must point out that when deep sedation is used as a form of euthanasia, this is an abuse of medical ethics. Such sedation is often an imposed death, whereby the family is not informed that the reason for the deep sedation is to cause the death of their family member.
Like all acts of euthanasia, deep sedation can be abused and is a direct threat to the lives of the most vulnerable people in our society who are not given the care and respect that is due a human person.
SHARE THIS STORY:
E-mail
Print
Newsvine
Digg
Reddit
Del.icio.us
Facebook
Latest Headlines
- Smashing Defeat for Pro-Abortion Forces in Brazil

- Largest Canadian March for Life Ever - 8,000 Attend Massive Rally on Parliament Hill

- Homosexualist Activist Links "Corrective Rape" of Lesbians to Ex-Gay Movement

- Western Australia Rejects Clone and Kill Bill

- U.K. Amendment Protecting Freedom of Speech on Homosexuality Removed…Then Kept In

- North Carolina Appeals Court Upholds Joint Custody for Separated Lesbian Couple

- Michigan Supreme Court Rules Governments, Universities Can't Give Homosexuals Health Benefits

- World Health Assembly to Endorse Pro-Abortion Conference

Most Read this Week
- Sacrilegious Display Continues Disturbing Pattern of Hate at Rockford Abortuary
- Lesbian Break-in and Riot During College Speech on "Born-Gay Hoax" Forces Cancellation
- McGuinty's Plan to Scrap Lord's Prayer Backfires as Groundswell Grows in Opposition
- Pro-Abortion Speaker at Notorious Pro-homosexual Parish Cancelled
- Darwin, Hitler, and the Culture of Death
- CAUGHT ON VIDEO: Wisconsin U Student Senator Vandalizing Pro-Life Display of Crosses
- CAUGHT ON VIDEO: Wisconsin U Student Senator Vandalizing Pro-Life Display of Crosses
- Grand Theft Culture: The Entertainment Industry Goes for the Jugular
- Abortion Kills Your Sex Life Says UK Doctor in Times Column
- Furious Britons Give Brown and Labour Worst Electoral Pummelling in Forty Years
MORE NEWS:
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page
Last 10 Days
Archives
Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any Internet re-publishing of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews that have come from other news sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.


Back to Top