Politics
Thursday May 15, 2008
See today's LifeSiteNews stories
California Supreme Court Imposes Homosexual 'Marriage' on State
LOS ANGELES, May 15, 2008 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Today the California Supreme Court imposed, through judicial fiat, so-called same-sex marriage on Californians, thus totally disregarding the sanctity of marriage and the will of the people. In 2000, Californians adopted Proposition 22 to protect marriage and maintain its definition as a union between one man and one woman, and expressly prohibiting the state from recognizing same-sex marriages.
To ensure that marriage is protected and the voice of the people is heard, a constitutional marriage amendment must be placed on the November ballot and national efforts need to be made to generate a federal constitutional marriage amendment. The decision must be removed from the hands of judicial activists and returned to the rightful hands of the people.
This seemingly undemocratic ruling has gravely concerned many prominent members of several family groups across the country. Karen England, executive director for Capitol Resource Institute, stated "The people of California decided eight years ago that marriage in our state will be defined as between one man and one woman. Four arrogant, elitist, activist judges decided that they know better than the people how marriage should be defined."
Ron Prentice, the executive director of California Family Council, warns of the contempt this ruling shows towards democracy, "This shocking decision is a wake-up call for the majority of California's citizens, whose votes have been rendered worthless by the Supreme Court's disregard for the democratic system."
The ruling not only incites fear on the ability of the government to uphold the values of the people, but if left unchanged, has severe implications on the foundation of society: the family. Stephen Bennet, Executive Director of Stephen Bennet Ministries and a former homosexual, recognizes the devastating effects that same-sex marriages have on families and especially children, “My immediate concern is for America's children -- children who will be deceived into believing this sinful activity is normal and natural: it is not."
Bennet also fears the same rulings in other parts of the U.S. could become more prevalent: “My state of Connecticut is also ready to make a ruling regarding the exact same issue. I wouldn't be surprised if Connecticut made their decision today or tomorrow. I could see the headlines: gay marriage imposed on America from Califonia to Connecticut.”
Matt Barber, CWA Policy Director for Cultural Issues, alluded to the upcoming November general election, during which the constitution could be amended to truly represent the hearts of the majority of Californians, "On a positive note, the Court's decision today will likely serve as a wake-up call to both Californians and their fellow Americans across the country. I'm certain this decision will help fuel a California marriage amendment and re-ignite debate over a federal amendment which would protect marriage as between one man and one woman."
England reiterated the importance of the November Ballot, "We now must focus our energy on passing the Protect Marriage Initiative and place traditional marriage in the state constitution. This outrageous decision will electrify voters and we are certain they will once again choose to protect traditional marriage."
ProtectMarriage.com, a coalition dedicated to defending the sanctity of marriage, has already submitted 1.1 million Californian’s signatures to the Supreme Court, an initiative that should power the proposed amendment to the ballot, which if passed, would see marriage defined once again as the union of one man and one woman.
Back to TopSHARE THIS STORY: E-mail Print Newsvine Digg Reddit Del.icio.us Facebook
Latest Headlines
- Phill Kline Fights Critical Primary Campaign to Keep Planned Parenthood Case Alive - Asks Pro-Life Movement for Help
- Catholic University of San Diego Changes Mind - Rejects Radical Non-Christian Feminist For Theology Chair
- Traditional Anglican Bishops of Canada Protest Giving Order of Canada to Abortionist Morgentaler
- McCain Takes Obama to Task on Abortion, Still Defends Embryo Destroying Research
- Is the Pro-life Movement Too Christian? - Letters to the Editor for Friday, July 18, 2008
- London Times Runs Article Promoting Incest
- San Jose Professor Fired for Answering Question about Genetics and Homosexuality
- Dutch Replace Maiden Name with "Birth Name" to Accommodate Homosexual "Marriage"
- Spanish Euthanasia Advocates Launch Legalization Campaign
- NJ Assemblyman Proposes Legislation that Could Fund Embryonic Research through Back Door
- Same-sex "Marriage" Will Not be Counted in 2010 U.S. Census
- Canadian Politicians Take Part in Toronto's Raunchy Gay Pride Parade
- Homosexual High School Clubs Increase Risk of Suicide says Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays & Gays
- LifeSiteNews.com NewsBytes for July 18, 2008
Most Read this Week
- Death Wish: The Impending Suicide of a Once Great Nation
- Virgin Mobile Solicits Youth to Strip for Charity, Posts Videos on Website
- US Pediatric Nursing Journal Toys with Infanticide
- Priest Expert Says Infanticide is 50 Years Away from Being Normalized
- Knights of Columbus Calls on All 230,000 Members to Demand Morgentaler Award be Revoked
- "Premature Sexualisation" Pushing Young Girls into Depression and Self-Harm: New Study
- Norway Trial Court Finds Missionaries Guilty for Spreading Gospel
- Success: After Public Exposure, Psychiatrist Quits Signing Off on Late Term Abortion
- San Jose Professor Fired for Answering Question about Genetics and Homosexuality
- Why Is the Pro-Life Movement So Christian, and Should it be?
MORE NEWS: 
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page Last 10 Days Archives Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any Internet re-publishing of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews that have come from other news sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.