Wednesday May 21, 2008


US Court Rules Banning Partial Birth Abortions Performed "By Accident" Are Unconstitutional
Judges tossed out for second time Virginia law criminalizing "partial birth infanticide"
By Peter J. Smith
RICHMOND, May 21, 2008 (LifeSiteNews.com) - In a ruling as frustrating as it was bizarre to pro-life advocates, judges on the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals decided Tuesday that Virginia's ban on partial birth abortion was unconstitutional in part because it criminalized doctors who committed the procedure "by accident."
The three judge panel by a vote of 2-1 tossed out for the second time the Virginia law that made it a crime for abortionists to perform what the law described as "partial birth infanticide" or Dilation and Extraction (D&X) abortions. They are also called intact Dilation and Evacuation (D&E) abortions. The law has been challenged since 2003 and has never gone into effect. In 2005 the same panel struck down the law, but the US Supreme Court later rescinded the ruling after it upheld a similar federal ban on abortion, and ordered the 4th circuit court to examine the constitutionality of the law in light of its recent decision.
Judge M. Blane Michael, a Clinton-appointee, in writing for the majority, contended the federal ban meant only to punish doctors determined at the outset to perform the prohibited abortions, not those who simply in the process of aborting an infant just made an honest mistake.
However, Judge Michael wrote that the Virginia ban would make felons out of doctors who intend to perform the standard D&E procedure (where the infant is dismembered inside the womb) "but who nonetheless accidentally deliver the fetus to an anatomical landmark and who must perform a deliberate act that causes fetal demise in order to complete removal."
The law defines the anatomical landmarks as the point where "the infant's entire head" or "trunk past the navel" is "outside the body of the mother."
The majority said that the Virginia ban would discourage abortionists from performing the standard D&E method common to 2nd trimester abortions, because doctors would be liable to net themselves a felony conviction carrying a 10 year sentence if they accidently performed an intact D&E or "partial birth infanticide."
"The Virginia Act is therefore unconstitutional because it imposes an undue burden on a woman's right to obtain an abortion," concluded Judge Michael. Judge Diana Gribbon Motz, also appointed by President Clinton, joined him in his opinion.
Pro-abortion advocates heaped praise on the decision and said the court was right to strike down "such an extreme ban."
"The only way for doctors to obey this law would be to stop performing the most common second trimester abortion methods," said Stephanie Toti, staff attorney at the Center for Reproductive Rights in a press release.
"After reading the majority's opinion, one is struck by the extensive efforts the opinion makes to conceive of a remote hypothetical factual circumstance that might exemplify its thesis that the Virginia Act prohibits more than is prohibited by the Federal Act, which the Supreme Court upheld in Gonzales v. Carhart," said dissenting Judge Niemeyer. Unlike Judges Michael and Glotz, Niemeyer was appointed by President George H.W. Bush.
"The majority's selective use of statutory language and its rationalizations," he continued, "represent nothing less than a strong judicial will to overturn what the Virginia Legislature has enacted for the benefit of Virginia's citizens and what, in materially undistinguishable terms, the Supreme Court has upheld as constitutional."
The final decision in this case, Richmond Medical Center v. Herring, may come down to the Supreme Court, where Justice Anthony Kennedy will likely have the final say. Kennedy's ruling in Gonzales v. Carhart allowed the federal ban on partial-birth abortion, because other abortion methods were available that did not restrict a woman's access to abortion.
Read the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals Ruling:
http://pacer.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinion.pdf/031821A.P.pdf
SHARE THIS STORY:
E-mail
Print
Newsvine
Digg
Reddit
Del.icio.us
Facebook
Latest Headlines
- Legislators Seek Abortion-on-Demand for Every State in Mexico

- Video Catches Planned Parenthood Covering Up Statutory Rape

- Kenyan Cardinal Blasts Attempt to Legalise Abortion

- Franciscan University Board Member Backs Obama, School Distances Itself

- Democratic Platform Promises, Republican Platform Rejects More Abortion Overseas

- San Francisco Catholic Charities Ends Relationship with the US' "Gayest Adoption Agency"

- US Government Cuts Off Supplies to Marie Stopes International

- Pope Commends Knights of Columbus for their Pro-Life Work

- The 16th International Week of Prayer and Fasting

- Billy Graham to Turn 90: Public Invited to Send Personal Stories, Birthday Wishes

- Catholic Magazine Calls For Defeat And Removal Of Prime Minister Harper

Most Read this Week
- Extreme Pro-Abortion Feminist Heather Mallick Scheduled to Speak at Catholic St. Mary's University
- Sarah Palin Speaks on Abortion, Contraception, Homosexuality
- Martin Sheen Stars in Ad Opposing Assisted Suicide in Washington State
- Abortion Patient of George Tiller Feared for Life: 'They're Liable to Kill Me'
- Bella Star Eduardo Saves Five Unborn Babies' Lives
- CBC Apologises for "Porn Star" Attack on Palin
- Russia: 64% of Pregnancies End in Abortion
- Catholic Magazine Calls For Defeat And Removal Of Prime Minister Harper
- Eduardo Verastegui Talks about Obama, Saving Babies Outside L.A. Abortion Clinic
- Swedish Man Awarded $24,170 Compensation after Filming Himself Having Sex with 14 Year-Old
MORE NEWS:
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page
Last 10 Days
Archives
Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.


Back to Top