Friday September 19, 2008
Good News for Proposition 8: New Study Shows Polls Significantly Understate Support for True Marriage
Support for traditional marriage rises considerably when voters cast their ballots in the privacy of the voter booth
SACRAMENTO, CA, September 19, 2008 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A new study has found that polls conducted prior to elections tend to greatly underestimate voter support for true marriage amendments that are set to appear on the election ballots. The study suggests that California's Proposition 8, which will appear on November's ballot, is likely more widely supported than pollsters claim.
The study, which compared polling in 26 states, found that polls conducted prior to elections underestimated support for true marriage measures by an average of 7%. In some cases, polls undershot the true acceptance of a measure by as much as 21%. Only in Arizona did support for marriage actually drop when voters hit the booths, by 3 percentage points.
While the latest traditional marriage proposition, Proposition 8 in California, appears, according to some polls, to be out of favor with voters, the study suggests it's highly likely that Proposition 8 is not in as much peril as pollsters are claiming.
"Recent polls published by California media outlets claim that Proposition 8 to restore marriage in California as between a man and a woman, is trailing among voters. These polls, including the Field Poll released this week, suffer from the same historic problem that other polls on this subject around the country have had: they do not accurately reflect the true support for traditional marriage," said Frank Schubert, campaign manager for ProtectMarriage.com, the sponsors of the California marriage initiative who released the study.
"For example," said Schubert, "the Field Poll showed that support for Proposition 22 in 2000 was at 53% right before the election, yet over 61% of voters supported the proposition."
The recent Field Poll Schubert mentions shows a significant drop in support for Proposition 8 after the wording of the initiative was changed to say that the Proposition "eliminates (the) right of same-sex couples to marry." Marriage supporters have criticized the new wording as a deliberate attempt to put the proposition in a negative light.
But Schubert expects that, while voters may not want to appear opposed to same-sex "marriage" in the polls, they will stand by their values when the decisive moment comes.
"I can't say for sure why polls almost always understate support for traditional marriage," said Schubert, "but I believe it is because the media portrays same-sex 'marriage' as being politically correct. Supporters of traditional marriage don't want pollsters to consider them intolerant, so they mask their true feelings on the issue.
"The result is that support for traditional marriage rises considerably when voters cast their ballots in the privacy of the voter booth. It is my opinion that the same thing will happen in California when voters cast ballots on Proposition 8."
To see results of the new study comparing voter polls with actual results, and for more information on Proposition 8, visit http://www.protectmarriage.com
Latest Headlines
- BREAKING: US Congress Passes Health Care Reform Bill 220 to 215

- Stupak Amendment to Health Care Bill Passes 240 - 194 Saturday Evening

- Major Health Care Development - Pro-Life Stupak Amendment Vote OK'd for Today

- NY Times: Dems Banking on Later Squeezing Pro-Life Language Out of Bill in Committee

- USCCB Spokesman: "Definitely Not True" that Bishops Support Bill As it Stands

- TIME Got it Wrong - Prof. George Opposed Grandiose Kennedy Funeral

- USCCB Condemnation Tears Facade off "Phony" Abortion Compromise for Health Bill

- Health Care Bill Includes Monthly Abortion Premium: House Minority Leader Boehner

- TIME Article Setting Burke Against O'Malley Called "Tactical strike" on Behalf of Catholic Left

- Dirty Fighting on Abortion Funding: Word-Games and Health-Care Theatrics Boggle the Mind

- Commentary on November 6 News

- Note to LifeSiteNews Subscribers with Rogers email addresses

- New York Gov. Declares Nov. 10 Extraordinary Legislative Session for Same-Sex "Marriage"

- Washington's Pro-Family Amendment Effort Defeated - R-71 Almost Certain to Pass

- Vote Pushed Back on Canadian Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide Bill to Dec. 2

- Elderly U.K. Couple in Good Health Commit Suicide, Complain of Assisted Suicide Law

- Texas Late-Term Abortionist and Baptist Minister Admits: "Am I killing? Yes, I am"

- New Evidence Contradicts CCHD's Findings on Accused Pro-Abortion Partner

- Quebec Priest Denies Possibility of Sexual Reorientation Therapy on TV

- New Hampshire Same-Sex "Marriage" Law in Crosshairs after Maine's Law Crumbles

- Brooklyn Bishop Criticized for Recorded Message Praising Pro-Abortion Politician

- First Group of "Traditionalist" Anglicans in Britain Votes to Enter Catholic Church

Most Read this Week
- Planned Parenthood Director Resigns after Watching Ultrasound of Abortion Procedure
- Breaking: Dominican Community Apologizes for Nun Caught Acting as Abortion Escort
- Nun Defiant Following Rebuke, but Stops Abortion Escorting
- Over 200 Christendom College Students Protest Abortion at Planned Parenthood Clinic
- TIME Article Setting Burke Against O'Malley Called "Tactical strike" on Behalf of Catholics Left
- Scottish Gay Rights Activists Found Guilty of Pedophilia Sentenced to Life Imprisonment
- Newly Identified Corporate Supporters of Planned Parenthood Named
- Health Care Bill Includes Monthly Abortion Premium: House Minority Leader Boehner
- Canadian MP Launches Petition to Stop Federal Funding of Planned Parenthood
- Planned Parenthood's President Lashes Out at USCCB
MORE NEWS:
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page
Last 10 Days
Archives
Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.








Back to Top