Wednesday November 4, 2009
No British Referendum on Lisbon Treaty: Tory Leader
By Hilary White
ROME, November 4, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) - While the leader of Britain's Tory opposition party had long promised to stand against Lisbon should he form the next government, David Cameron is now saying that opposition to Lisbon after the fact is pointless. They can "no more hold a referendum on the treaty than ... a referendum on the sun rising in the morning," he said.
Cameron, who is expected to be the next Prime Minister, garnered headlines today when he said that despite what he had once called his "cast iron guarantee" of a public referendum on Lisbon, the party will seek only to "repatriate" some of Britain's powers from Brussels back to Westminster.
"The Lisbon treaty has now been ratified by every one of the 27 member states of the European Union, and our campaign for a referendum on the Lisbon treaty is therefore over. Why?" he asked. "Because it is no longer a treaty: it is being incorporated into the law of the European Union. Next week, the new posts that the Lisbon treaty creates - a president and a foreign minister - will be filled."
Pro-life campaigners against Lisbon have long warned that the European Union will become even more unaccountable with the passage of Lisbon, which grants the power to overturn national laws, including those like Ireland's pro-life constitutional guarantees, to the European Court of Justice.
But the new Tory rhetoric may not go over well with voters. Benedict Brogan wrote in the Daily Telegraph today that "those who do not live and breathe the subtleties of Westminster may have missed the small print in the 'cast-iron guarantee' the party leader offered when he promised to give voters the say on the treaty that Gordon Brown (and Tony Blair) denied them."
Judging from the Telegraph's "heaving postbag," voters are already not happy with Cameron's change of direction. "To them," Brogan writes, "it was a simple proposition: Mr Cameron said they would get a referendum, and they, trusting souls, believed him.
"They assumed that Mr Cameron meant what he said. Or at least, what they thought he had said. They did not hear the 'but' that limited the pledge to the eventuality that the Treaty had not come into force. And boy, are they angry as a result."
Latest Headlines
- Appeal Filed to Give D.C. Voters Right to Vote on Gay “Marriage” Law

- Cardinal George Denounces "New Ways Ministry" as Pseudo-Catholic Organization

- “Bogus Compassion” is Killing Children and Corrupting Society: Belgian Philosopher

- Indian Court Rules Born and Unborn Are Equal

- United Nations Urges Nicaragua to Legalize Abortion

- Irony: 19-Child Duggar Family Renting Former Home of Local Planned Parenthood Leader

- Document Reveals Inconsistencies in ND's Jenkins Claims on ND88

- New Country Music Star Born as Pro-Life Ballad Climbs the Charts

- Commentary on February 8 News

- Police Refuse to Release Federal "Threat Assessment" on Wis. Pro-Lifers

- Canadian Human Rights Commission Appeals Ruling against Hate Messages Statute

- Homosexual Activist Keith Norton Dies at 69

- Letters to the Editor

Most Read this Week
- Veterans, Former Army Legal Chief Defend “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”
- Planned Parenthood President Lands Spot on Ford Foundation Board
- Rabbis Warn against 'Disaster' of Open Homosexuality in the Military
- Football Pros Give Support to Tim Tebow Super Bowl Ad
- Clash of the Abortion Titans: Planned Parenthood Launches 'Pro-Choice' Football Ad
- Canadian Station Pulls Pro-Life Ad – Too “Graphic”
- Hijacking the Brain — How Pornography Works
- Group Exposes Media "Fraud" at March for Life
- U.S. Sisters in Crisis after Embracing “Secular Culture”: Vatican Cardinal
- NYT: Rampant Polygamy in Gay 'Marriage' May Benefit Institution
MORE NEWS:
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page
Last 10 Days
Archives
Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.








Back to Top