Friday November 6, 2009
Washington's Pro-Family Amendment Effort Defeated - R-71 Almost Certain to Pass
Microsoft, Google, Planned Parenthood, Nike, T-Mobile funded efforts to retain pro-gay domestic partnerhip law
By Peter J. Smith
OLYMPIA, Washington, November 6, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A pro-family referendum effort in Washington State to reject a domestic partnership law that gives homosexual couples all the rights and benefits of marriage without the name of "marriage" has ended in defeat. The cash-strapped effort came close, but not close enough to achieve victory at the ballot box in what has been described as a veritable "David and Goliath" contest.
The domestic partnership law had originally been passed by the state's legislature. But pro-family advocates managed to gather enough signatures to put the law to a popular vote. The ballot initative, R-71, if passed would ensure that the partnership law comes into effect.
The latest mail-in ballot results show Washington voters approving Referendum 71 by 52 percent (698,850 votes) to 48 percent (645,701), a lead that pro-family advocates concede would take nothing short of a statistical miracle to overcome.
Larry Stickney, campaign manager for Protect Marriage Washington, the umbrella group of pro-family organizations behind the Reject R-71 effort, told LifeSiteNews.com that they plan to wait it out for the rest of the afternoon (pacific time) to make fully certain of the result and then "probably at that point concede."
"We have been in a slugfest against a well-oiled political machine that had $3 million to spend, and the entire statewide media and political establishment behind them," Stickney said, "and our little rag-tad outfit stood them down pretty well and nearly beat 'em. So we feel pretty good about it."
The Approve R-71 effort received huge corporate donations and endorsements from industry giants Microsoft and Google. Washington Families Standing Together, the chief coalition working to pass the pro-domestic partnership ballot initiative, received donations from groups such as Nike, Planned Parenthood, and T-Mobile, as well as donations from liberal institutions such as the American Civil Liberties Union and the homosexualist Human Rights Campaign.
The most recent data available from Washington State's public disclosure database shows the defeated pro-family effort was heavily out-funded, and therefore heavily outgunned in its advertizing efforts. The public database shows that Approve R-71 forces mustered over $2.12 million dollars to fund their advertizing efforts, while pro-family advocates could only gather about $480,000 to reach out to voters.
Demographics, however, also played a role in the R-71 battle. All the counties east of the Cascades voted overwhelmingly to reject R-71, while the more suburban counties gathered around Puget Sound voted for the referendum.
Critical to R-71's passage was King county, where Seattle is located. Over 249,486 voters (or 67.26%) in King county approved R-71, while 121,458 (or 32.74%) voted to reject it. With R-71 passing in Washington by just 50,000 votes, King county tipped the balance decisively in favor of R-71.
"We're very, very proud of the effort," said Stickney. The Protect Marriage Washington coalition gathered thousands of volunteers and connected hundreds of pro-family leaders in conservative and Christian circles, establishing networks, mailing lists, and e-mail databases that will be critical to the next fight that will likely be over legalizing same-sex "marriage."
"We think that we can now start to compete with the big bucks folks from Seattle on a grassroots level through the use of electronic media, which we've utilized heavily."
"I think we've proved we can take it right to them and run a genuine conservative issue, dish it out, and either win or be very close to winning," said Stickney, confident that the battle for R-71 was the beginning and not the end for the Protect Marriage Washington coalition. "So we're going to continue to be a genuine Christian organization with a robust faith in God as well as our mission to change the state."
Latest Headlines
- Appeal Filed to Give D.C. Voters Right to Vote on Gay “Marriage” Law

- San Francisco Chronicle: “Open Secret” That Prop. 8 Judge is “Gay”

- Cardinal George Denounces "New Ways Ministry" as Pseudo-Catholic Organization

- Vatican: Population Growth is a Means of Overcoming Poverty, Not a Cause of It

- “Bogus Compassion” is Killing Children and Corrupting Society: Belgian Philosopher

- Indian Court Rules Born and Unborn Are Equal

- United Nations Urges Nicaragua to Legalize Abortion

- Vatican Consultant Responds to 'Completely Ignorant' IPPF Accusation

- Irony: 19-Child Duggar Family Renting Former Home of Local Planned Parenthood Leader

- Document Reveals Inconsistencies in ND's Jenkins Claims on ND88

- New Country Music Star Born as Pro-Life Ballad Climbs the Charts

- Commentary on February 8 News

- Police Refuse to Release Federal "Threat Assessment" on Wis. Pro-Lifers

- Canadian Human Rights Commission Appeals Ruling against Hate Messages Statute

- Homosexual Activist Keith Norton Dies at 69

- Letters to the Editor

Most Read this Week
- Veterans, Former Army Legal Chief Defend “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”
- Planned Parenthood President Lands Spot on Ford Foundation Board
- Rabbis Warn against 'Disaster' of Open Homosexuality in the Military
- Football Pros Give Support to Tim Tebow Super Bowl Ad
- Clash of the Abortion Titans: Planned Parenthood Launches 'Pro-Choice' Football Ad
- Canadian Station Pulls Pro-Life Ad – Too “Graphic”
- Hijacking the Brain — How Pornography Works
- Group Exposes Media "Fraud" at March for Life
- U.S. Sisters in Crisis after Embracing “Secular Culture”: Vatican Cardinal
- NYT: Rampant Polygamy in Gay 'Marriage' May Benefit Institution
MORE NEWS:
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page
Last 10 Days
Archives
Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.








Back to Top