Saturday November 7, 2009
Major Health Care Development - Pro-Life Stupak Amendment Vote OK'd for Today
House to Open Health Debate Today after All-Night War in Rules Committee
By Kathleen Gilbert
WASHINGTON, D.C., November 7, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Abortion negotiations stretching into Friday evening have ended in the House Rules Committee reportedly allowing a vote on Hyde-amendment language in the health care bill. The full House debate on the momentous bill is now poised to begin Saturday morning.
Democrat leadership evidently made the late concession during a Rules Committee hearing last night as part of an increasingly desperate search for enough votes to pass the health care bill. The pro-life language spearheaded by Democratic Rep. Bart Stupak, reflecting the Hyde amendment's ban on federal funding of abortions, will at long last be open to a vote on the House floor. Both parties in the debate expect the House to vote the Stupak amendment into the bill.
During the hearing, Stupak quoted House Speaker Nancy Pelosi during the 2006 campaigns, when she said, "The voice of American has a right to be heard."
"So, like every American, I wish to be heard on the sanctity of life," Stupak said.
The unexpected concession reportedly drove several pro-abortion Democrats, including Rules Committee chairman Louise Slaughter, to leave the room amid the negotiations.
There was a false start earlier in the evening, when Stupak had initially agreed to a compromise that would allow a vote on Hyde-amendment protection for the government-run public option, but not to other portions of the bill, such as taxpayer subsidies for abortion-covering insurance plans.
"There was some compromise language from different proposals that we thought would be satisfactory, our understanding was that we had an agreement. Two hours later it was not an agreement," Stupak said around 1 a.m. this morning.
Democrats hold 258 seats in the House, which means they can only afford 40 Democrats to vote against the bill and still keep a majority. However, a group of about 40 Democrats had vowed to kill the bill by voting down its procedural rule if Stupak's amendment was not granted a vote.
Pro-abortion groups immediately issued statements condemning the arrangement.
"This amendment would violate the spirit of health care reform, which is meant to guarantee quality, affordable health care coverage for all, by creating a two-tiered system that would punish women, particularly those with low and modest incomes," said Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards late last night.
On the other side, National Right to Life is strongly urging pro-life Americans to call Congress today urging support for the NRLC-backed Stupak-Pitts Amendment. In its release NRTL emphasized, "the Stupak-Pitts Amendment would prohibit coverage of elective abortion in two big new federal programs created by the bill -- the new federal health insurance plan ('public option') and the premium-subsidy program ('affordability credits')."
NRTL provides detailed guidance on contacting House Members within its online release.
American Life League has also sent out an urgent email to its members urging immediate action on the vote. Their Friday, 5 p.m. message stated, "We’ve got little more than 24 hours until the House votes on the $1.2 trillion abortion mandate called 'health care.' The vote is scheduled for 6 p.m. on Saturday night. This is it. If Nancy Pelosi gets her way tomorrow, our government will force us to pay for abortion, contraception, embryonic stem cell research, in vitro fertilization, experiments on preborn human beings, euthanasia, rationed health care and mandatory Planned Parenthood-style sex education."
Latest Headlines
- "Manhattan Declaration" Embodies U.S. Christian Pushback against Abortion, Same-Sex "Marriage"

- Hoffman Loses Final Tally of NY-23 Race; Alleges ACORN Tampering and Fraud

- Abortion Activist Judge Hamilton Confirmed with Help of Ten Republican Senators

- CDC Reverses Gardasil Vaccine Requirement for Immigrants

- Germany Faces Economic Downturn with Plummeting Birth Rate and Aging Population

- CCHD in Archdiocese of Chicago Says it is Working to Fix Problems

- Rejection of Washington DC Marriage Referendum Challenged With Legal Suit

- Obama-Supporting Homosexual Activist to Out Sexually Involved Priests Unless they Support Gay 'Marriage

- Austrian Catholic Bishops Issue Bland Response to Govt's Homosexual Partnership Bill

- Interim Report on Catholic Sex-Abuse Says "Homosexual Identity" Not a Predictor of Sex Abuse

- Commentary on Nov 20 NewsBytes

- LSN NewsBytes - US Health Care Reform

- LSN NewsBytes - Catholic Campaign for Human Development (CCHD)

- LSN NewsBytes - Life Issues, Religion, Swine Flu, US Politics, Sarah Palin, Miscellaneous

- LSN NewsBytes - Climate Change/Global Warming

- 59 Bishops Contributed Financially to Maine Bishop's Effort to Oppose Maine Same-Sex "Marriage" Law

- Pro-Abortion Lawmakers Shower Praise on Senate Bill's Phony Abortion Compromise

Most Read this Week
- Largest U.S. Homosexual Publisher Shuts Down, Closing Major Gay Newspapers
- EWTN's Arroyo Hosts Reform CCHD Reps Who Reveal Shocking Evidence Against USCCB Anti-Poverty Arm
- Italian Mayors Order Crufixes Put in Classrooms in Revolt against European Court Ruling
- Nat'l Organization for Marriage Responds to Miss California "Sex Tape" Scandal
- Obama Evades Questioning on Stupak Amendment in FOX Interview
- "Manhattan Declaration" Embodies U.S. Christian Pushback against Abortion, Same-Sex "Marriage"
- French Judge Finds Hospital Guilty of "Unreasonable Obstinacy" in Saving Newborn's Life
- EU Leaders to Choose President today in Secret "Soviet Style" Meetings
- Hoffman "Unconcedes" Battle for NY-23: Recount Provides Hope for "Miracle" Victory
- CCHD Responds to Reform Movement
MORE NEWS:
LifeSiteNews.com Home Page
Last 10 Days
Archives
Special Reports
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.








Back to Top