Thursday June 29, 2006
UK Doctors Move From Neutral to Rejecting Assisted Suicide
By Hilary White
LONDON, June 29, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) – In a vote this week, the
British Medical Association (BMA) took a clear stand against physician
assisted suicide. 65% of the 500 doctors at the BMA's meeting in
Belfast voted against the proposal to accept assisted suicide.
This represents a significant development from previous trends. In a
narrow vote last year the BMA refused to take a position against
assisted suicide, though individuals and pro-life organizations have
said the practice is going on quietly and the courts have ruled that
disabled patients do not have the right not to be dehydrated to death.
In July 2005 the BMA was discussing whether to support then-pending
legislation in the House of Lords that would legalize assisted suicide.
Members voted narrowly not to oppose the legislation.
Lord Joffe, the author of the bill, praised the BMA’s decision to stay
out of the way of the movement that pro-life advocates say leads
inevitably to active euthanasia. He said, “The BMA’s decision to adopt
a neutral stance is an important move because the Government is really
thinking carefully about the issue.”
The bill was blocked in May, but Lord Joffe and its supporters have vowed to reintroduce it until it is passed into law.
A poll of UK doctors showed that 70 per cent were opposed to assisted
suicide. Dr Andrew Davies, from Cardiff, told the BBC that terminally
ill patients in his care had “a lot on their minds,” but for many their
main concern was the effect their illness was having on their families.
“My worry is that a right to die will become a duty to die, a duty to
unburden their families.”
Read previous LifeSiteNews.com coverage:
British Medical Association Drops Opposition to Assisted Suicide
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2005/jul/05070409.html
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.