Thursday July 13, 2006

NY Supreme Court Says State Does Not Recognize Canadian Same-sex “Marriages”

By John Jalsevac

Nassau County Supreme Court LONG ISLAND, NY, July 13, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) – The New York State Supreme Court has denied a homosexual couple spousal benefits, despite their being “married” in Canada two years ago, the New York Times reports.

The case was brought forward by Duke. L. Funderburke, who was attempting to obtain medical benefits reserved for married couples from the Uniondale Union Free School District, for his homosexual partner, Bradley Davis.

NY Supreme Court Justice Edward W. McCarthy, however, referred back to last week’s decision by New York’s Appellate Court as the basis for his refusing to extend such benefits to the homosexual couple. 

At the time appellate Justice Robert S. Smith demurred from following the treacherous road of judicial activism, stating for the Court, "We hold that the New York Constitution does not compel recognition of marriages between members of the same sex. Whether such marriages should be recognized is a question to be addressed by the legislature."

Funderburke’s lawyer, however, Alphonso David, argued that the Appellate Court’s decision only forbids same-sex “marriages” from being performed in the state, and does not forbid such “marriages” performed elsewhere to be recognized by the state.

“This decision misapprehended the Court of Appeals decision,” argued David, according to the NY Times. “Our position has always been that same-sex couples cannot get married in New York, and that’s why out of state marriages should be respected.”

Justice McCarthy, however, disagreed, writing "Under current New York law, plaintiff and his partner are not considered spouses and therefore spousal insurance benefits are unavailable to them."

This is not the first time that homosexual couples “married” in Canada have attempted to use their Canadian “marriage” as leverage to force the issue in their own state or country. Two women in Britain presented arguments earlier this year to a U.K. high court that the U.K should recognize their Canadian same-sex “marriage.” In a similar case, three homosexual Israeli couples that were “married” in Canada are now attempting to force the Israeli government to recognize their unions as legitimate marriages. 

See related LifeSiteNews.com coverage:

Homosexual Couples “Married” in Canada Push Home Countries for Recognition
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2006/jun/06060501.html

New York's Highest Court Rules 4-2 In Favor Of Traditional Marriage
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2006/jul/06070601.html

URL: http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2006/jul/06071301.html

Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.