December 19, 2011 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Twenty years ago when advocates of homosexuality were arguing for acceptance of gay sex, their opponents warned that it would lead to pedophilia and incest.  Such whistle blowers were labeled as bigots, haters and worse, and laughed into silence.

However, the warnings are coming true.  While incest may not yet be legal on the books, there is increasing pressure to legitimize it. The following video, which has gone viral on YouTube, might legitimately be seen a part of the conditioning process leading to such legitimization.  It features a high school prank where blindfolded teens are asked to guess who kissed them. Turns out it was their own father or mother.

In the video fathers can be seen passionately kissing their teen daughters on the lips, mothers with their teen sons, one even putting her son’s hand on her derriere, another making out on the floor with her son (although to be fair, one commenter on Youtube who said he was present at the pep rally said the boy tripped when he stepped back and his mother fell on top of him), all to the laughs, cheers, whoops and screams of the school staff and students.

Oh sure, there’s still an ick factor in there somewhere, but the very fact that organizers of this prank could find parents willing to make out with their children is proof enough that the taboo against incest has started to crumble.  It may be “just” a joke now, but even a few years ago such a joke would have been completely unthinkable.

Responding to the controversy over the incident, School District spokesman Tony Taschner told the Star Tribune that the same prank was pulled several years ago at Rosemount High, but, reports the paper, “the kisses were more like pecks on the cheek.” Principal John Wollersheim told the paper, “none of the students or parents involved in the kissing have complained to him.”

For a mere joke, parents are willing to sensually abuse their children? And it is abuse! 

This incident should serve as a wake up call to society. In essence the sexual revolution has been effective in removing the natural revulsion of pedophilia and incest.  Pedophilia and incest are becoming normalized, just as those who warned against the sexual revolution predicted. Remember, it was only a few months ago that we reported on a meeting involving academics from high-level institutions, including Harvard, who met in Baltimore with the aim of destigmatizing “minor-attracted persons” (i.e. pedophiles).

Even though Supreme Court Justice Scalia wrote in his dissenting decision to the 2003 US Supreme Court ruling striking down anti-sodomy laws that the decision would lead to allowance of “adult incest, you’d be wrong if you believed that the genesis of all this revolves around acceptance of homosexuality.  That was just another casualty along the road of the revolution which divorced sex from its primary meaning and purpose – procreation.

The concept that sex is first and merely for pleasure, which was immensely aided by the advent of the birth control pill, has wrought untold destruction on the world.  It launched the sexual revolution from which has come rampant pornography, adultery, divorce, promiscuity, homosexuality, sexual abuse, rape, and, more recently, the growing acceptance of pedophilia and incest.

Do you think we’re still far away from societal acceptance of incest?  Think again.

• In 2007, the German brother-sister couple Patrick Stuebing and Susan Karolewski asked the Constitutional Court to overturn the ban on incest.

• Also in 2007 a German Government publication which encouraged parents to sexually stimulate their infant children was only removed after LifeSiteNews and other media exposed it internationally.

• In 2008 the London Times ran an article by an unnamed ‘academic’ promoting incest.  The article was entitled “I had sex with my brother but I don’t feel guilty.”

• Last year in Switzerland there was a legislative proposal to legalize incest between consenting adults.

• And for years Planned Parenthood has been accused of covering up incest via their abortion ‘services’ without suffering severe consequences.

Logically, those without a moral compass formed by God have no basis for vehement objection even to incest - at least consensual contraceptive incest.  As University College London Professor Roland Littlewood put it: “The main problem is, of course, that the couple might produce unhealthy children. But if they don’t have children, then I see no reason why not, in this day and age. But then, I’m a scientist, not a moralist.”

So in the final analysis this news, as gross as it is, presents an opportunity for those who know the truth of God-given morality to speak to their friends and family about the ick factor they experience with incest.  Why is there an intuitive disgust over it when logically, from an amoral atheistic perspective, there is no real basis for such disgust?  The truth is that there is stamped on the human heart the Creator’s natural law and we must recognize it before it is too late.