LifeSiteNews.com Life, Family and Culture News

Email: "US Court Stands by Military’s Decision to Curb Homosexuality within Ranks"

Your Email:

Your Name:

Send To Email:

Subject:

Message:
BY LifeSiteNews.com BOSTON, June 10, 2008 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit ruled Monday that the military’s "Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell" policy on homosexual behavior does not violate the U.S. Constitution.  The policy prevents people with homosexual inclinations from serving in the U.S. military, and was deemed constitutional because it is based upon important considerations of military life.A friend-of-the-court brief was filed by the National Legal Foundation and funded by the Alliance Defense Fund, and members of both organizations argued in court to protect the "Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell" policy."When lawmakers have to decide between a military that can most effectively defend our nation and one that becomes a forum for social experimentation, the choice is clear:  our nation’s security comes first," said ADF-allied attorney and NLF President Steven W. Fitschen.  "The military has certain obvious dynamics that make the inclusion of people who openly engage in homosexual behavior impractical.  That is the rationale behind the policy, and the court was correct to uphold its constitutionality."In its ruling, the court dismissed the constitutional challenges to the policy and acknowledged that it must defer to Congress’ intent in drafting it.  The policy, part of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994, states that "military life is fundamentally different from civilian life" and "success in combat requires military units that are characterized by high morale, good order and discipline, and unit cohesion.""As Colin Powell explained to Congress, it is very difficult to put those who are attracted to members of the same sex in the same bedrooms, barracks, showers, and latrines with those who are not.  It is an environment where people simply don’t have a choice of where they live or who they associate with," said Fitschen.The court noted that arguments that the policy violates the free speech rights of those who participate in homosexual behavior are without merit:  "Ultimately, the Act is justified on a content-neutral, non-speech basis; specifically, maintaining the military’s effectiveness as a fighting force."The full text of the 1st Circuit’s ruling in Cook v. Gates is available at www.telladf.org/UserDocs/GatesOpinion.pdf.  A copy of the ADF-funded brief submitted to the court by the National Legal Foundation is available at www.telladf.org/UserDocs/GatesAmicus.pdf.See related LifeSiteNews.com articles:Appeals Court Reinstates Case Against Air Force For Dismissing Lesbian Nursehttp://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2008/may/08052302.html http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/us-court-stands-by-militarys-decision-to-curb-homosexuality-within-ranks/

Please enter the word you see in the image below: