LifeSiteNews.com Life, Family and Culture News

Email: "US Supreme Court Ruling Seen as Blow to Religious Freedom"

Your Email:

Your Name:

Send To Email:

Subject:

Message:
BY LifeSiteNews.com Washington, DC, Feb. 25 (CWNews.com/LifeSitenews.com) - The US Supreme Court expanded on the current judicial precedents on the separation of church and state on Wednesday, by ruling that states can withhold scholarships and grants from students who study theology.  The court decided 7-2 that the state of Washington had acted properly in revoking a taxpayer-funded scholarship from a college student who majoring in religious studies. “Training someone to lead a congregation is an essentially religious endeavor,” Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist wrote for the court majority. “Indeed, majoring in devotional theology is akin to a religious calling as well as an academic pursuit.”  The ruling is being seen as a step back for the Supreme Court, which recently had been loosening the definition of separation. It could also impact President George W. Bush’s plan to allow faith-based organizations to compete in federal social service programs on an equal level with secular groups without compromising on their religious identity. It is also seen as a blow to school voucher programs. Two years ago, the Supreme Court allowed parents to use taxpayer-funded vouchers to send their children to private schools, even religious ones. However, the court’s new ruling means that such voucher programs likely will not spread to states with Blaine amendment laws.  About 36 states have so-called Blaine amendments, laws dating from the 19th century imposed under anti-Catholic pressure to prevent taxpayer funds from being spent on religious education. The dissenting justices were Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas.  “Let there be no doubt: This case is about discrimination against a religious minority,” Scalia wrote in the minority opinion. “In an era when the court is so quick to come to the aid of other disfavored groups, its indifference in this case, which involves a form of discrimination to which the Constitution actually speaks, is exceptional.” He added, “The indignity of being singled out for special burdens on the basis of one’s calling is so profound that the concrete harm produced can never be dismissed as insubstantial.” http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/us-supreme-court-ruling-seen-as-blow-to-religious-freedom/

Please enter the word you see in the image below: