Ben Johnson

,

In 2013, pro-life fight shifts to the states

Ben Johnson
Ben Johnson
Image

WASHINGTON, D.C., January 25, 2013, (LifeSiteNews.com) – The pro-life movement intends to transform the political landscape over the next four years with successful measures sweeping through statehouses across the nation, according to pro-life leaders and a prominent Republican strategist.

The last two years have witnessed more pro-life laws than any time since the advent of abortion-on-demand mandated by Roe v. Wade. In all, lawmakers enacted 83 such measures in 2011 and 43 last year.

“Over the past two years, we have had 2,500 requests for AUL [Americans United for Life] model legislation,” said Dr. Charmaine Yoest, the organization's president, at a conference the organization held at the National Press Club on Thursday.

AUL's most popular measures deal with defunding abortion providers and reinforcing conscience rights, she said.

Legislation winding its way through states from Georgia to Idaho is “dramatically changing the contours of abortion policy in this country” in the level of government that is “closest to the people.”

The new stratagem is both a practical response to and a tacit acknowledgment of the fact that the national government, for the next four years, is in enemy hands.

“We really won't see much if anything happen at the national level in the next several years, although we will try,” Dr. Yoest said.

Bill Kristol, editor of the Weekly Standard, told the group of several hundred leaders, “I wish we could look at great advances in federal legislation and executive orders and judicial appointments,” but “I think it's pretty obvious that's unlikely.”

The judicial branch, which imposed the abortion-on-demand regime on the United States, could tilt even further away from the unborn, making it an unreliable source of change.

At the Supreme Court “at best it's 5-4 against us, with Justice Kennedy and the four Democratic nominees” supporting Roe v. Wade, said Ed Whalen, president of the Ethics and Public Policy Center and a blogger at NRO.

Click "like" if you are PRO-LIFE!

Among those rumored to retire from the bench during the next four years, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is perhaps the court's most ardent supporter of abortion, having spent most of the 1970s as an ACLU attorney.

But should Justice Antonin Scalia, 76, step down, that would dramatically shift the balance of the court against life, Whalen said.

Barack Obama will also appoint the federal judiciary, from which future justices are drawn.

That does not mean the movement should have no agenda on the federal level, though, said the leaders.

Kristol encouraged participants to protect the unborn “incrementally, yet in a principled way.”

Kristol – whose father, Irving, was one of the founders of the Neoconservative movement – is not often associated with the pro-life wing of the Republican Party.

“Holding the line and winning what small victories one can is underrated, I would say generally, in politics,” he offered.

“I think in practice over the next 2, 3, 4 years a lot of realistic, incremental, modest things have to be attempted,” he suggested. “Some will work. Others won't work so well.”

Turning back the Obama administration's most radical goals – such as the HHS mandate, which he called “an unbelievable overreach” – is well within Republicans' means, he said.

The Obama administration's decision to target religious liberty irks some of Kristol's Democratic friends. One told him after speaking with officials inside the White House, “They know what they're doing. They think it's a winning fight.”

“Defending religious freedom is in a sense easier,” Kristol added. “Just as a practical political matter, it requires one to make less ambitious arguments.”

The Supreme Court's 9-0 decision upholding religious freedom in the Hosanna v. Tabor case, which was supported even by the newly appointed Elena Kagan and fellow Obama appointee Sonia Sotomayor, illustrates the limits of left-wing successes in attacking religious freedom.

Although the court upheld the Affordable Care Act – known popularly as “ObamaCare” – by a 5-4 margin, the justices did not rule on the constitutionality of the HHS mandate.

“The intellectual problems they're having will result in they're having political problems... maybe not in the very far future,” Kristol said.

Meanwhile, politicians like Rick Perry of Texas, Phil Bryant of Mississippi, and Virginia Delegate Bob Marshall have laid out ambitious pro-life goals for 2013.

“We don't need the White House for the fifth decade of fighting Roe,” Dr. Yoest said.

Support hard-hitting pro-life and pro-family journalism.

Donate to LifeSite's fall campaign today


Share this article

Advertisement
Featured Image
'Don’t ever say ‘yes’ to that. It’s terrible,' said Robertson.
John Jalsevac John Jalsevac Follow John

Phil Robertson: Never vote for politicians who support ‘ripping human fetuses’ from mom’s womb

John Jalsevac John Jalsevac Follow John
By John Jalsevac

Phil Robertson is known for not pulling any punches when it comes to expressing his opinions on controversial issues, and he certainly didn’t disappoint at the Outdoor Extravaganza in Louisiana earlier this month.

Speaking to a massive crowd of some 8,000 outdoors enthusiasts at the CenturyLink Center, Robertson blasted Christians for not getting active in the political sphere.

“There are about 90 to 100 million of us who claim Jesus. The problem is only half of you register to vote and out of the half of you that registers to vote, only half of that group actually goes and votes,” Robertson said, according to the ShrevePort Times.

“Therefore, when you’re looking up there and griping and complaining about what you see in Washington D.C., you might as well shut up,” he added. “The reason they’re there is we’re putting them there. If you don’t get anything else out of this, remember this — register to vote for crying out loud.”

But Robertson reserved his strongest remarks for politicians who support abortion.

“If the dude or woman is for ripping human fetuses out of their mother’s womb, don’t ever vote for that,” Robertson said bluntly. “Don’t ever say ‘yes’ to that. It’s terrible.”

Click "like" if you are PRO-LIFE!

Robertson also lamented the increasing secularization of the United States.  

“We’ve lost it folks,” he told the crowd. “We ran God out of our schools. We ran him out of the entertainment business. We ran him out of the news media. We’ve run him out of the judiciary, and we’ve run him out of Washington D.C.

“Well, what you get is what is left up there. They’re ungodly. You agree?”

Ever since A&E’s Duck Dynasty became the most popular reality show in TV history, members of the Robertson family have earned a name as unapologetic defenders of traditional Christian values.

At the Outdoor Extravaganza, Phil was accompanied by his wife, Miss Kay, and eldest son Alan, who also addressed the crowds. 

Phil’s blunt deliveries have occasionally landed him in hot water – most memorably when he addressed the topic of homosexuality in an interview with GQ magazine, earning him a short-lived suspension from his TV show by A&E.

But Robertson refused to apologize for the remarks despite intense pressure from homosexual activists and leftist groups.

“They railed against me for giving them the truth about their sins,” Robertson later said about the response to his GQ interview, pointing out that in the interview he had simply quoted Scriptural prohibitions against homosexuality and a variety of other sins.

"The news media didn't even know it was a verse," Robertson said. "They thought I was just mouthing off."

Share this article

Advertisement
Ulrich Klopfer wide
Ben Johnson Ben Johnson Follow Ben

Four Indiana abortionists could lose their licenses over reporting violations

Ben Johnson Ben Johnson Follow Ben
By Ben Johnson

The attorney general of Indiana, Greg Zoeller, has asked a state board to review the medical licenses of four abortionists, including an out-of-state abortionist who failed to report two cases of statutory rape.

The Indiana Medical Licensing Board will review the cases of Dr. Ulrich “George” Klopfer, Dr. Resad Pasic, Dr. Kathleen Glover, and Dr. Raymond Robinson.

A press release from the attorney general's office called Klopfer's “the most egregious complaint.” Klopfer, who lives in Crete, Illinois, failed to report abortions of two 13-year-olds – one at his Women’s Pavilion abortion facility in South Bend and another in his office in Gary.

All abortions must be reported to the Indiana State Department of Health, and abortions performed on minors younger than 14 must also be reported to the Indiana Department of Child Services within three days. Under state law, children under the age of 14 are incapable of consenting to sex, so any sexual relationship with them is considered likely statutory rape.

Klopfer reported the two abortions 116 days and 206 days afterwards, something he described as “an honest mistake.” Klopfer faces a misdemeanor criminal charge in both Lake and St. Joseph county in connection with those allegations.

Every single one of the 1,818 abortion reports Klopfer turned in to state authorities between July 2012 and November 2013 was false or incomplete, Zoeller says. The doctor often omitted the father's name and had a habit of listing the date of every abortion at 88 weeks gestation.

The abortionist is also charged with 13 violations of the state's informed consent law.

“The pending criminal charges brought by county prosecutors along with the sheer volume of unexplained violations...merits review by the Medical Licensing Board to determine whether disciplinary action is warranted,” Zoeller said.

The other three abortionists work at the Clinic for Women in the Indianapolis area. According to a press release from the state attorney general's office, they “are in alleged violation of similar record-keeping and advice and consent laws regarding abortion procedures,” but they face no criminal charges.

The allegations were collected and submitted by Indiana Right to Life, which combed through Klopfer's records. “Our legislators passed laws regarding consent and record keeping to ensure high standards of quality and care for Hoosier women,” Indiana Right to Life President and CEO, Mike Fichter, said. “We're disappointed that these abortion doctors apparently did not willingly comply with Indiana law. We hope the Medical Licensing Board immediately schedules hearings.”

“If found guilty, we believe the abortion doctors should be fined and their licenses to practice in Indiana should be revoked," he added.

Click "like" if you are PRO-LIFE!

His views were shared by national pro-life leaders. “We are encouraged by the filing of these Administrative Complaints today and urge the Board to revoke Ulrich Klopfer’s medical license due to the fact that he placed young girls in serious risk of continued rape and other abuse by neglecting to report,” said Troy Newman, President of Operation Rescue. “Each of these abortionist require stiff discipline in order to impress it upon others that laws are meant to be followed and that they are not above it.”

Zoeller's complaint did not mention a third abortion of a 13-year-old that Klopfer reported after the legal date. The abortion took place in Fort Wayne in February 2012, but he did not report the procedure until July. Police subsequently filed two charges of child molestation against Ronte Lequan Latham, who was then 19-year-old.

Tensions this produced with another physician in his Fort Wayne office led to the first abortion facility closure of 2014.

The epidemic of underreporting presumed statutory rape is not limited to Klopfer. Between 58 and 75 percent of abortions performed on Indiana girls under the age of 14 were not reported in accordance with the law, according to an investigation by Amanda Gray of the South Bend Tribune.

Klopfer had a history of run-ins with authorities. In 2010 and 2012, state inspectors found that he allowed the bodies of aborted babies to be stored in a refrigerator alongside medicine the office gave to women who came in for the procedure.

The board has not yet set a date to hear evidence and make a judgment about their fitness to practice. If the board objects, it could respond by issuing a reprimand, suspending a license, or revoking the abortionists' medical license and imposing fines.

The accused may continue performing abortions until the board makes a final decision. 

Advertisement
Featured Image
President Obama speaks at Planned Parenthood's national conference in 2013.
Dustin Siggins Dustin Siggins Follow Dustin

Obama remakes the nation’s courts in his image

Dustin Siggins Dustin Siggins Follow Dustin
By Dustin Siggins
Image

It has often been said that the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is President Obama's greatest achievement as president. However, that claim may soon take second place to his judicial nominees, and especially their effect on marriage in the United States.

In a new graphic, The Daily Signal notes that while President George W. Bush was able to get 50 nominees approved by this time in his second term, Obama has gotten more than 100 approved. According to The Houston Chronicle, "Democratic appointees who hear cases full time now hold a majority of seats on nine of the 13 U.S. Courts of Appeals. When Obama took office, only one of those courts had more full-time judges nominated by a Democrat."

Three of the five judges who struck down state marriage laws between February 2014 and the Supreme Court's Windsor decision in 2013 were Obama appointees, according to a CBS affiliate in the Washington, D.C. area. Likewise, the Windsor majority that overturned the Defense of Marriage Act included two Obama appointees, Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan. Obama has nominated 11 homosexual judges, the most of any president by far, says the National Law Journal.

Only one federal judge has opposed same-sex "marriage" since the Supreme Court's Windsor decision. He was appointed under the Reagan administration.

This accomplishment, aided by the elimination of Senate filibusters on judicial nominees, could affect how laws and regulations are interpreted by various courts, especially as marriage heads to a probable Supreme Court hearing on the constitutionality of state laws.

Democrats eliminated the filibuster for all judicial nominees except for Supreme Court candidates last year, saying Republicans were blocking qualified candidates for the bench. However, the filibuster was part of the reason Democrats were able to keep the number of approved Bush appointees so low.

The Supreme Court may hear multiple marriage questions in its 2015 cycle. 

Share this article

Advertisement

Customize your experience.

Login with Facebook