Cheryl Sullenger

Pro-lifers demand: President Obama, investigate Illinois Planned Parenthood for a needless death

Cheryl Sullenger
By Cheryl Sullenger

CHICAGO, July 24, 2012, (Operation Rescue) — New information is surfacing about the young woman who died from a botched second-trimester abortion at a Planned Parenthood clinic in Chicago on Friday along with reports that a second Chicago area Planned Parenthood summoned an ambulance for an abortion patient on the same day, prompting continued calls for a thorough investigation.

Tonya Reaves, 24, died Friday evening after suffering massive bleeding following a Dilation and Evacuation abortion at the Loop Center Health Care Planned Parenthood. She left a one-year old son named Alvin, a grieving fiancé, and an upset family that is now demanding answers.

The Cook County Medical Examiner’s Office is telling callers Tonya’s death has been ruled accidental. The autopsy report has not yet been released. Requests for the records have been filed.

“That autopsy report will tell us more about what happened to Tonya, but we already know that complications that can cause hemorrhage, such a uterine perforation, are treatable. Tonya’s death was tragically avoidable, and Planned Parenthood must be held accountable for taking the life of this young mother,” said Troy Newman, president of Operation Rescue and Pro-Life Nation.

The Pro-Life Action League is now reporting that an ambulance was summoned to the Planned Parenthood abortion clinic in the Chicago suburb of Aurora on the same Friday that Tonya died from her abortion-related injuries. According to Ann Scheidler, no patient was transported, nevertheless, some kind of medical emergency initially existed that prompted the call for emergency assistance.

“Two women suffered serious abortion complications on Friday at Planned Parenthood’s clinics. One lived and one died. These clinics need to be investigated thoroughly by the authorities before more women are maimed or killed,” said Newman.

Planned Parenthood’s medical and legal problems extend nationwide.

(Click “like” if you want to end abortion! )

In the past 18 months, Operation Rescue has documented ten incidents of botched abortions at Planned Parenthood clinics in cities including Boston, Massachusetts, St. Paul, Minnesota, Virginia Beach, Virginia, Sioux City, Iowa, Everett, Washington, and St. Louis, Missouri.

“The ten botched abortions we have documented are just the tip of the iceberg. These are just the small fraction that pro-life activists happened to witness and document. Planned Parenthood does everything it can to conceal the truth about the actual number of serious complications at its clinics,” said Newman.

Other abuse-related problems have been exposed in recent months, including:

  • Planned Parenthood of Illinois — the same place where Tonya Reaves died — is under investigation for Medicaid fraud allegedly committed by its medical director, abortionist Caroline Hoke;
  • Criminal charges against Planned Parenthood in Kansas for illegal late-term abortions and manufacturing evidence;
  • Whistleblower suits filed by former Planned Parenthood employees in California, Texas, and Iowa alleging massive billing fraud;
  • Closure of the entire Planned Parenthood Golden Gate affiliate for financial malfeasance;
  • The widespread non-reporting of child sex abuse;
  • The participation in sex-selection abortions;
  • Congressional investigation into Planned Parenthood’s misuse of federal funds for abortions;
  • The webcam abortion pill scam in Iowa that has prompted the introduction of legislation banning the dangerous practice at the federal level and in at least seven states.
  • The documentation by Life Dynamics, Inc. that Planned Parenthood specifically targets minority communities, especially blacks, for abortion.

“When we cut through the misleading rhetoric that Planned Parenthood spins out on a daily basis, what is left is an unscrupulous and corrupt organization that will stop at nothing to sell abortions and keep government subsidies rolling into their coffers,” said Newman. “We must oppose the tax funding of Planned Parenthood at every level in order to protect the public from fraud and medical abuse.”

Meanwhile, Tonya Reaves lay dead in the morgue while her family pleads for answers.

Her twin sister, Toni, told reporters that Tonya was “just fine one day and then the next day she was gone…We are just trying to figure out what happened.”

The Chicago Sun-Times has reported that calls to the Reaves family are now being referred to a personal-injury lawyer.

Members of the black community have also expressed outrage.

“To this day, Planned Parenthood’s billion dollars a year, genocidal formula continues to kill women and children — with black women and children being disproportionately targeted for abortion. This is no accident — it’s just business — a very cruel and bloody business!” stated Day Gardner, President of National Black Pro-Life Union. “I am so sad and angry about the death of this beautiful black girl and her baby. Tonya Reaves and her child should not have died!”

“We pray that Tonya’s heartbreaking death is the proverbial straw that breaks the camel’s back as far as Planned Parenthood is concerned,” said Newman. “Enough is enough. We simply cannot wait until another young mother is killed and more tax dollars are flushed down Planned Parenthood’s abortion rat hole.”

Earlier this year, President Obama remarked on the tragic slaying of Trayvon Martin, “If I had a son, he’d look like Trayvon. And I think they are right to expect that all of us as Americans are going to take this with the seriousness it deserves, and that we’re going to get to the bottom of exactly what happened.”

“Well Mr. President, does Tonya Reaves look enough like your daughters to investigate Planned Parenthood?” asked Newman. “To do any less is to disrespect Tonya’s memory and play politics with women’s lives.”

Operation Rescue is calling on the public to contact President Obama and demand an investigation into the death of Tonya Reaves and insist that the federal funding of Planned Parenthood be immediately suspended until we “get to the bottom of exactly what happened.”

Contact President Obama:
White House Comments Line: 202-456-1111
E-Mail Page: http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/submit-questions-and-comments

This article originally appeared on the Operation Rescue website and is reprinted with permission.


Advertisement
Featured Image
A Nazi extermination camp. Pete Baklinski / LifeSiteNews
Pete Baklinski Pete Baklinski Follow Pete

Imagine the outrage if anti-Semites were crowdsourcing for gas chambers

Pete Baklinski Pete Baklinski Follow Pete
By Pete Baklinski
Image
A Nazi oven where the gassed victims were destroyed by fire. Pete Baklinski / LifeSiteNews
Image
Empty canisters of the poison used by Nazis to exterminate the prisoners. Pete Baklinski / LifeSiteNews
Image
Syringe for Manual Vacuum Aspiration abortion AbortionInstruments.com
Image
Uterine Currette AbortionInstruments.com
Image

Imagine the outrage if the Nazis had used online crowdsourcing to pay for the instruments and equipment used to eradicate Jews, gypsies, the handicapped, and other population groups — labeled “undesirable” — in their large industrialized World War II extermination facilities. 

Imagine if they posted a plea online stating: “We need to raise $85,000 to buy Zyklon B gas, to maintain the gas chambers, and to provide a full range of services to complete the ‘final solution.’”

People would be more than outraged. They would be sickened, disgusted, horrified. Humanitarian organizations would fly into high gear to do everything in their power to stop what everyone would agree was madness. Governments would issue the strongest condemnations.

Civilized persons would agree: No class of persons should ever be targeted for extermination, no matter what the reason. Everyone would tear the euphemistic language of “final solution” to shreds, knowing that it really means the hideous crime of annihilating a class of people through clinical, efficient, and state-approved methods of destruction. 

But crowdsourcing to pay for the instruments and equipment to exterminate human beings is exactly what one group in New Brunswick is doing.

Reproductive Justice NB has just finished raising more than $100,000 to lease the Morgentaler abortion facility in Fredericton, NB, which is about to close over finances. They’re now asking the public for “support and enthusiasm” to move forward with what they call “phase 2” of their goal.

“For a further $85,000 we can potentially buy all the equipment currently located at the clinic; equipment that is required to provide a full range of reproductive health services,” the group states on its Facebook page.

But what are the instruments and equipment used in a surgical abortion to destroy the pre-born child? It depends how old the child is. 

A Manual Vacuum Aspiration abortion uses a syringe-like instrument that creates suction to break apart and suck the baby up. It’s used to abort a child from 6 weeks to 12 weeks of age. Abortionist Martin Haskell has said the baby’s heart is often still beating as it’s sucked down the tube into the collection jar.

For older babies up to 16 weeks there is the Dilation and Curettage (D&C) abortion method. A Uterine Currette has one sharp side for cutting the pre-born child into pieces. The other side is used to scrape the uterus to remove the placenta. The baby’s remains are often removed by a vacuum.

For babies past 16 weeks there is the Dilation and Evacuation (D&E) abortion method, which uses forceps to crush, grasp, and pull the baby’s body apart before extraction. If the baby’s head is too large, it must be crushed before it can be removed.

For babies past 20 weeks, there is the Dilation and Extraction (D&X) abortion method. Guided by ultrasound, the abortionist uses forceps to partially deliver the baby until his or her head becomes visible. With the head often too big to pass through the cervix, the abortionist punctures the skull, sucks out the brains to collapse the skull, and delivers the dead baby.

Other equipment employed to kill the pre-born would include chemicals such as Methotrexate, Misoprostol, and saline injections. Standard office equipment would include such items as a gynecologist chair, oxygen equipment, and a heart monitor.

“It’s a bargain we don’t want to miss but we need your help,” writes the abortion group.

People should be absolutely outraged that a group is raising funds to purchase the instruments of death used to destroy a class of people called the pre-born. Citizens and human rights activists should be demanding the organizers be brought to justice. Politicians should be issuing condemnations with the most hard-hitting language.

Click "like" if you are PRO-LIFE!

Everyone should be tearing to shreds the euphemistic language of “reproductive health services,” knowing that it in part stands for the hideous crime of annihilating a class of people through clinical, efficient, and state-approved methods of destruction that include dismemberment, decapitation, and disembowelment.

There’s a saying about people not being able to perceive the error of their day. This was generally true of many in Hitler’s Germany who uncritically subscribed to his eugenics-driven ideology in which certain people were viewed as sub-human. And it’s generally true of many in Canada today who uncritically subscribe to the ideology of ‘choice’ in which the pre-born are viewed as sub-human.

It’s time for all of us to wake-up and see the youngest members of the human family are being brutally exterminated by abortion. They need our help. We must stand up for them and end this injustice.

Let us arise!


Advertisement
Featured Image
Shutterstock.com
Paul Wilson

The antidote to coercive population control

Paul Wilson
By Paul Wilson

The primary tenet of population control is simple: using contraception and abortifacients, families can “control” when their reproductive systems work and when they don’t – hence the endless cries that women “should have control over their own bodies” in the name of reproductive health.

However, in much of the world, the glittering rhetoric of fertility control gives way to the reality of control of the poorest citizens by their governments or large corporations. Governments and foreign aid organizations routinely foist contraception on women in developing countries. In many cases, any pretense of consent is steamrolled – men and women are forcibly sterilized by governments seeking to thin their citizens’ numbers.  (And this “helping women achieve their ‘ideal family size’” only goes one way – there is no government support for families that actually want more children.)

In countries where medical conditions are subpar and standards of care and oversight are low, the contraceptive chemicals population control proponents push have a plethora of nasty side effects – including permanent sterilization. So much for control over fertility; more accurately, the goal appears to be the elimination of fertility altogether.

There is a method for regulating fertility that doesn’t involve chemicals, cannot be co-opted or manipulated, and requires the mutual consent of the partners in order to work effectively. This method is Natural Family Planning (NFP).

Natural Family Planning is a method in which a woman tracks her natural indicators (such as her period, her temperature, cervical mucus, etc.) to identify when she is fertile. Having identified fertile days, couples can then choose whether or not to have sex during those days--abstaining if they wish to postpone pregnancy, or engaging in sex if pregnancy is desired.

Of course, the population control crowd, fixated on forcing the West’s vision of limitless bacchanalia through protective rubber and magical chemicals upon the rest of the world, loathes NFP. They deliberately confuse NFP with the older “rhythm method,” and cite statistics from the media’s favorite “research institute” (the Guttmacher Institute, named for a former director of Planned Parenthood) claiming that NFP has a 25% failure rate with “typical use.” Even the World Health Organization, in their several hundred page publication, “Family Planning: A Global Handbook for Providers,” admits that the basal body temperature method (a natural method) has a less than 1% failure rate—a success rate much higher than male condoms, female condoms, diaphragms, cervical caps or spermicides.

Ironically, the methods which they ignore – natural methods – grant true control over one’s fertility – helping couples both to avoid pregnancy or (horror of horrors!) to have children, with no government intervention required and no choices infringed upon.

The legitimacy of natural methods blows the cover on population controllers’ pretext to help women. Instead, it reveals their push for contraceptives and sterilizations for what they are—an attempt to control the fertility of others. 

Reprinted with permission from the Population Research Institute.


Advertisement
Featured Image
United Nations headquarters in New York Shutterstock.com
Rebecca Oas, Ph.D.

New development goals shut out abortion rights

Rebecca Oas, Ph.D.
By Rebecca Oas Ph.D.

Co-authored by Stefano Gennarini, J.D.

A two week marathon negotiation over the world’s development priorities through 2030 ended at U.N. headquarters on Saturday with abortion rights shut out once again.

When the co-chairs’ gavel finally fell Saturday afternoon to signal the adoption of a new set of development goals, delegates broke out in applause. The applause was more a sigh of relief that a final round of negotiations lasting twenty-eight hours had come to its end than a sign of approval for the new goals.

Last-minute changes and blanket assurances ushered the way for the chairman to present his version of the document delivered with an implicit “take it or leave it.”

Aside from familiar divisions between poor and wealthy countries, the proposed development agenda that delegates have mulled over for nearly two years remains unwieldy and unmarketable, with 17 goals and 169 targets on everything from ending poverty and hunger, to universal health coverage, economic development, and climate change.

Once again hotly contested social issues were responsible for keeping delegates up all night. The outcome was a compromise.

Abortion advocates were perhaps the most frustrated. They engaged in a multi-year lobbying campaign for new terminology to advance abortion rights, with little to show for their efforts. The new term “sexual and reproductive health and rights,” which has been associated with abortion on demand, as well as special new rights for individuals who identify as gay, lesbian, bisexual or transsexual (LGBT), did not get traction, even with 58 countries expressing support.

Click "like" if you are PRO-LIFE!

Despite this notable omission, countries with laws protecting unborn children were disappointed at the continued use of the term “reproductive rights,” which is not in the Rio+20 agreement from 2012 that called for the new goals. The term is seen as inappropriate in an agenda about outcomes and results rather than normative changes on sensitive subjects.

Even so, “reproductive rights” is tempered by a reference to the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development, which recognizes that abortion is a matter to be dealt with in national legislation. It generally casts abortion in a bad light and does not recognize it as a right. The new terminology that failed was an attempt to leave the 1994 agreement behind in order to reframe abortion as a human rights issue.

Sexual and reproductive health was one of a handful of subjects that held up agreement in the final hours of negotiations. The failure to get the new terminology in the goals prompted the United States and European countries to insist on having a second target about sexual and reproductive health. They also failed to include “comprehensive sexuality education” in the goals because of concerns over sex education programs that emphasize risk reduction rather than risk avoidance.

The same countries failed to delete the only reference to “the family” in the whole document. Unable to insert any direct reference to LGBT rights at the United Nations, they are concentrating their efforts on diluting or eliminating the longstanding U.N. definition of the family. They argue “the family” is a “monolithic” term that excludes other households. Delegates from Mexico, Colombia and Peru, supporters of LGBT rights, asked that the only reference to the family be “suppressed.”

The proposed goals are not the final word on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). They will be submitted to the General Assembly, whose task is to elaborate a post-2015 development agenda to replace the Millennium Development Goals next year.

Reprinted with permission from C-FAM.org.


Advertisement

Customize your experience.

Login with Facebook